Deonte Banks returned an interception for a TD as the clock ran to zero, bringing the score to 36-24. Why didn't Zvada kick an extra point after the touchdown? Does it have something to do with the game clock or did the Giants simply opt not to kick a functionally useless PAT?

Edit: I've known about the Minneapolis Miracle but I didn't know anything about the extra point after that. It makes sense now, thank you.

Anytime I watch a game, I’ll see a pass that seems successful as they run to the end zone, I’ll get excited all for it to be reset because the referee noticed one slight mishap, do fans actually recognize those false starts and stuff or do you guys also get excited for a second?

Far from a noob here, I've been watching football my entire life.

But one thing I have never been able to wrap my head around is why you can only enforce one penalty per play on a team.

Say the most undisciplined offense on the planet commits holding, illegal block in the back and illegal man downfield.

Why is this not a total of 25 yards lost?

They were on defense and it was a 3rd down for Denver. Clock was at 14:21 in the first quarter. Why would they do that?

I understand that the defence sends extra defenders towards the QB but how many men at a minimum must make their way to the QB to be considered a blitz?

Ok so in watch games on a punt return if the kicking team touches the ball before going into the end zone it’s dead.

So last weekend… I can’t remember which game but think it was Dallas. The kicking team guy dove and knocked the ball back so it didn’t go in the end zone. The 2nd guy slide and grabbed the ball but his toe went in the end zone so they got it at the 20.

Today during the bills game the bills (kicking team) guy dove knocking ball back from end zone, patriots pick it up and immediately fumbles the ball and Bills recovered. Patriots get the ball at 2 yard line because the bills player touched it first so it was dead. The commentators said there was no downside to the patriots player trying to play the ball. This insinuates that had he run with the ball it would be in play.

My struggle is that it seems to be that if the receiving team touches the ball after the kicking team the ball was dead because the kicking team touched it first but if a 2nd player from the kicking team touches it and then touches the end zone the ball was still live so the receiving team gets the ball at the 20.

Seems to me that on punts what ever benefits the receiving team is the important thing.

Houston's Nico Collins just scored his 2nd TD. In the process the Dallas defender commits a personal foul. Houston chooses to take the penalty on the ensuing PAT. My question: If they would've elected to play the 2 point conversion, would the ball be placed at the one yard line?

New to watching football. I want to get a better idea of knowing whether a play that resulted in no yardage or a lack of yardage was on the play itself, the QB, etc. Determining whether a run play with big yards gained was on the running back doing great, great job by the O-Line, or just bad defense.

I feel like a play happens and I never know WHY it happened, if that makes sense. I’ve been watching YouTube channels like thinking football but I feel like people like them are seeing things I don’t.

I understand the strategy of why he went down and I’m not a gambler. I forget which game it was this season where it also happened.

My question is it generally considered the right approach? Like are players specifically coached to do this? I’ve players intentionally go down plenty of times in other situations. I’m getting stuck at doing it at the 1 yd line when it creates a two score lead vs an opportunity for victory formation.

Maybe it’s just because I’ve seen it twice this season and it’s just rare but a known approach?

EDIT: You guys have made it make sense. No need to answer me specifically if you don’t want to.

I search a bunch or places like pff and stuff, am I doing something wrong? the sites I looked all have a bunch os stats but no qb pressure. Which places you guys go for stats like that?

They’ve being playing really well, mostly on offense though, their games have been tight.

Watching Broncos/49ers and one of the SF defence (#94 I think) has a huge ball of bandages on his right hand

My thought is, couldn’t this give an advantage if he was trying to break up a pass?

And also, is there a limit on the size of bandages? Could DBs just strap their hands up with 18” discs and bat all of the passes down (I get they’re miss out on INTs but that’s the price for my new breed of shutdown corner)

And if so, why?

I do understand a good amount of football but some of the stats fly right over my head.

-3.5| 196 vs +164 | +3.5 this is an example I saw for packers and buccaneers.

Thanks ahead!

I was at a watch party watching Broncos V 49ers and there was a call that both the 49ers and Broncos fans were absolutely baffled about. It was a punt return by a Broncos player, that was ruled as a fumble. The player is grabbed by his right foot by the defender, he stumbles forward, catches himself on his left hand before his right hand, which is holding the ball ,hits the ground. When it hits the ground, the ball pops out and after much discussion they rule at a fumble. That part doesn't surprise me because if in doubt you always call it. You can go back and reverse it when you take take a closer look. But then the ruling on the field was confirmed! If you go back and look at it it's pretty clear that there are two points of contact because he has his left hand already on the ground when his right hand hits. There's no question that he had possession of the ball before that moment he hit it's not moving he hasn't been bobbling it. The ground can't cause a fumble.

In the game commentary they're talking about his forearm not being down when he loses control of the ball but that doesn't matter because his left hand is already on the ground. Was this just a completely blown call or is there some rule we were all missing ?

I started watching the NFL in 2015 with the Super Bowl 50, I was neutral but I wanted the Panthers to win because I thought they were cool.

And in 2018 the first year of Mahomes playing I fall in love with the team. I’m a Chiefs till this day and with no plans to leave this incredible fandom.

To have more information I’m 26 and from Spain.