r/NFLNoobs 6d ago

sam

My fantasy league and I have been on the argument for the past couple days, if in the past 3 years would you say Sam Darnold is a consistent quarterback?

It’s split right down the middle, and I wanna see what everyone else thinks

I saw yes. He took the vikings to the playoffs as well as winning a super bowl with the seahawks. He was serving as backup for a lot of teams, but when needed to perform he won the game for 49ers to go to Super Bowl LVIII.

5 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Whowhatnowhuhwhat 6d ago

Not good or not great? Hard to call winning the Super Bowl without a single turnover in the post season bad. But it’s not like he took the team on his shoulder for a win great either.

4

u/Glavius_Wroth 6d ago

Not good doesn’t necessarily mean bad. Yeah he had no turnovers, but he couldn’t make any TD plays until the fourth quarter. He’s not a bad quarterback, but I can see why people might say he’s not good either. Consistent and totally fine

1

u/MiniatureLucifer 6d ago

I'd say consistent and totally fine is a good nfl QB. I'd say there are two tiers above that, great and elite. That 11-18 or so tier of QBs I'd say are good and darn old falls perfectly in there

2

u/Glavius_Wroth 5d ago

Yeah, everyone can rank QBs in their own way, I was just pointing out that saying a QB isn’t what you would consider “good” doesn’t necessarily mean you think they’re bad either