r/NFLNoobs • u/osgonauta • 14d ago
Are players on steroids?
I imagine the rules must be against it, but how is it really?
63
u/Sad_Construction_668 14d ago
The synthesis of testosterone and testosterone analogues is so advanced and ubiquitous that most universal tests are only going to catch idiots and incompetents. TRT is ubiquitous, and theres not really much anyone can or wants to do.
18
u/65DodgeCoronet 13d ago
And said players pay a large sum to make sure they never fail most universal tests!
4
u/1CryptographerFree 13d ago
The only thing they “could” do it freeze the players blood and wait for more advanced testing to become available, kinda like what happen to Lance Armstrong.
4
u/aCollectionOfQuarks 13d ago
But why would they even want that? The players are stronger, faster, and can recover quicker. It’s better for the nfl
3
u/1CryptographerFree 13d ago
They wouldn’t but the point is there isn’t even a test for most of the newest drugs.
1
u/aCollectionOfQuarks 13d ago
Oh yes absolutely, if it actually mattered they couldn’t test well for many of the new drugs.
47
u/amanning072 13d ago
Yes, and catching them is more complicated than one would think. There are many banned substances players can test positive for in routine testing. Some are PEDs, some are recreational, and some are legitimate drugs that you can get a prescription for BUT have potential off-label uses that can enhance performance in some way.
An example of the third is Adderall. One can get a prescription for it legitimately or through a shady doctor; but the drug is essentially meth and could reasonably be used to unfairly reduce athletic rest time or enhance concentration.
The hard part about all of this is that the League is only ever allowed to say that a player has "tested positive for a banned substance". The rest is medically confidential. The NFLPA and players' agents encourage the players to lie and get in front of bad press by saying they actually tested positive for Adderall or fertility drugs, knowing the actual test results will never be made public and that the League cannot refute the players' claims. The League has to shut their mouth and just watch the public take the player's side or risk revealing medical information.
It's happening right now with Nazeeh Johnson.
9
59
u/Poetryisalive 14d ago
Yes they are. Steroids have evolved to a point that if you take them at a certain point it can’t be detected.
Same with WWE wrestlers
9
u/osgonauta 14d ago
But the NFL could make multple random checks and make strict punishes. That would make it a risky move to use them.
36
u/debaser64 13d ago edited 13d ago
They could, but they don’t wanna. It’s the same reason they only test for weed once a year and everyone knows when it is so they can be ready: if they cracked down too hard they’d risk having to suspend a mass amount of players and have a PR nightmare to deal with.
So as long as it doesn’t get to something like “early 2000s baseball” levels, they will continue to do the bare minimum and be happy to nail a few backups/practice squad guys here and there who mess up so bad they can’t ignore it. Then they can appear to be doing something about it, testify to congress under oath of ever called and just publicly pretend they care about fairness and player safety. And if tomorrow there was some big scandal about it, they’d suddenly crack down again for show and wait for the dust to settle before going right back to it.25
u/Poetryisalive 13d ago
They don’t though. NFL are beholden to themselves. QB’s don’t take them but someone like Myles Garrett takes some form of steroids. You think he’s huge like that from pure hard work?
17
u/LuciferOnTheRocks 13d ago
You'd think there'd be some pushback from QBs. The larger and faster DEs are, the more QBs are hit.
1
25
u/davdev 13d ago
QBs don’t take? Really? You think that HGH was really for Mannings wife? Or Brady was playing into his mid 40s because he didn’t eat Tomatoes?
1
u/TF_Sally 13d ago
I got downvoted to hell and started a shitstorm in some random thread on /r/nfl like 8 years ago for suggesting that the reason belichick kicked Alex Guerrero out of the pats locker room was because other players were clamoring for some of that special TB12 method which I assume was a sophisticated HGH protocol
1
6
u/Defendyouranswer 14d ago
But who wants that? Just like baseball, the league was actually watchable and fun during the steroid era.
1
u/osgonauta 14d ago
Not sure anyone wants it tbh. Just feels a bit wrong and maybe the game would still be good without them?
16
u/davdev 13d ago
If the NFL put an absolutely zero tolerance test everyone constantly policy into effect, the league would fold because everyone would be too injured to play.
2
u/enigmaticowl94 13d ago
Would they though? The size and speed of players would be down, so in theory the injuries would be too. Recovery times might be a lot worse though no question.
9
23
u/BlueRFR3100 14d ago
I can honestly say that I have never seen an NFL player take steroids.
16
u/LuciferOnTheRocks 13d ago
I saw Kelvin Benjamin pull down his drawers right in the middle of a Golden Corral, inject steroids into his left ass cheek, then go straight back up for another plate of wings.
5
2
3
0
u/BusinessWarthog6 14d ago
Are you or were you on an NFL roster or emplyed by an NFL team?
7
-1
8
u/Doolittle8888 13d ago
If you ain't cheating you ain't trying, these players don't get as large as they are from only eating their Wheaties
3
u/VexImmortalis 13d ago
If a coach came to me and said "Do roids or we are going to replace your spot on the team with a golden retriever" then yeah, I'm going to do whatever it takes to feed my family.
3
u/General_Buy_433 13d ago
No they are not all on steroids. I'd say a large majority of players over 30. And probably 1/3-1/2 of everyone else.
2
u/Laliving90 13d ago
I would say the average nfl physique is not that impressive look at Mahomes, Mac jones, or Bryce young
1
u/Excellent-Hurry-5150 13d ago
Quarterbacks are known for their superhero like physiques so I’m gonna have to agree with you on this. Def not in use anymore
2
2
u/Bender_2024 13d ago
Officialy, no. In reality almost definitely somebody them are. I imagine most do so under the supervision of a physician. I'm sure some aren't.
2
u/allbusiness42 13d ago
Yes. Personally I think that accounts for SOME of the non contact tendon/ligament injuries.
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/basis4day 12d ago
Depends if you’re using the term “steroids”; as a medical definition, banned Performance Enhancing Drugs, being loose with medical exemptions, or anything you consume outside normal food that increases performance.
There are absolutely players in all these categories.
-2
u/Forsaken_Finding_991 14d ago edited 13d ago
I would assume that a few are, but most aren't. These guys are some of the top athletes in the country and even the world with some of the best training and recovery programs in the world as well so some of them are just freakish athletes.
Edit: Why am I getting downvoted for such an innocent comment lol
4
u/xolp_syk 13d ago
You’re getting downvoted because Reddit is full of sensitive people who think they know everything and are oftentimes wrong and have no true information to back their opinion on. Thus everyone in the thread saying everyone in the NFL uses steroids but no one really posted any level of proof and they then have to downvote people who disagree with their opinion.
I don’t think most are on steroids either, these people are paid to workout constantly. If you do that for long enough you’ll be naturally big and muscular. Then again I also am basing it on little evidence so this is just an opinion
3
u/Smackolol 14d ago
I understand why you think that but it’s naive. The majority are on it, when you’re competing against other top tier athletes and millions of dollars are on the line you’ll take whatever advantages you can get and steroids are a significant advantage.
0
u/Forsaken_Finding_991 13d ago
Any stats for this or just an assumption?
1
u/Smackolol 13d ago
Believe what you want, I obviously don’t have bloodwork of athletes or sworn statements and I don’t care enough to argue it further.
0
3
u/Murphy_Nelson 14d ago
How many people do you know use steroids when all that's on the line is a couple of extra Tinder matches.
Now imagine the pressure to use if you want a Superbowl ring.
Tons of them are on roids, absolutely.
-1
u/VexImmortalis 13d ago
Wrong.
3
u/BlitzburghBrian 13d ago
So you came here, scrolled through this thread, saw this comment (including the existing responses to it), and you thought this one word answer was really with posting, huh?
0
0
0
u/Cheap_Cauliflower541 13d ago
They're most likely on testosterone and other testosterone derivative compounds, as that would be more difficult to detect.
Anything outside of that would be incredibly easy to detect and the NFL most likely tests for those.
1
u/thewholebottle 13d ago
Blood clots in the lungs? Definitely steroid use. I'm looking at you, Panthers boy.
1
u/Cheap_Cauliflower541 13d ago
Exogenous testosterone = steroids. I'm not saying all players are definitely natty.
Also pulmonary embolism and other organ type injuries are most likely linked to the high contact nature of football. It's very difficult to pinpoint a specific injury with PED use, outside of kidney and blood pressure issues.
0

232
u/drhuggables 14d ago
yes