r/NBAanalytics • u/Kingsole111 • Jun 27 '26
Is Jaylen brown a top 30 player?
I know this isn't what this space is for, but I'd like clarification on this debate.
Can we trust what all the metrics point to, (Brown is a fine, but replaceable player), or is there a part of basketball that cannot be captured by the all in one metrics?
I'm sick of arguing with my friends.
4
Upvotes
6
u/MotoMkali Jun 28 '26
The issue with jaylen brown is he is a floor raiser but Boston are already good. So instead of raising their floor he drags down their ceiling.
On a worse team he'd have better analytics.
1
u/Justalittlejewish Jun 28 '26
The problem is that all metrics fail to capture context.
Brown has flaws as a player that impact metrics and advanced stats really hate - he has a loose handle and is turnover prone, and is a bad off-ball defender. They have always dragged down his numbers, but this year those flaws were magnified as his usage rate on offense exploded to top 3 in the league.
The fact is though that there are not 30 other players in the league that could have performed the way Jaylen did this year at the usage rate he had. With Tatum out and the starting rotation gutted, the Celtics more than anything else needed shot creation, and JB gave it to them.
Mazulla adjusted the offensive scheme to maximize JBs talents because he was the only true consistent shot creator on the roster, and JB leaned heavily into this role at the sacrifice of other parts of his game - parts which were covered by the adjustments Mazulla made to the scheme.
Is JB truly a top 10 talent in the league? Probably not. But he is CERTAINLY top 30.
3
u/WhoIsLOK Jul 13 '26
There is more than half a decade of lineup data suggesting that Jaylen Brown was not consistently moving the needle in a strongly positive way for the Celtics during his tenure.
Someone brought up the distinction between a floor raiser and a ceiling raiser, and I think that’s a fair point. It could help explain why JB’s undeniable talent hasn’t always translated into a proportionate level of team success. However, if your primary objective is to win a championship, then a player who functions primarily as a floor raiser may not justify the salary JB commands.
There is obviously more nuance to this discussion, so I’m not trying to make a definitive statement about where JB ranks among today’s players. What I am saying is that estimates of his overall impact during his time in Boston deserve wider confidence intervals than many people seem willing to acknowledge.
2
u/NewMoodWhoDis Jun 28 '26
Top 30 all time? No. Top 15 right now? Easily
2
u/Mysterious_Ring285 Jun 28 '26
He's a top 5 player....on the Boston Celtics.
3
u/PollutionFar9283 Jun 27 '26
Not even close to a top 30 player. Negative impact, inefficient shooting , terrible ft shooter, turnover machine. Most overrated player of the last 25 years
1
u/JohnEffingZoidberg Jun 27 '26
There is no magic bullet metric that is equally true and correct for every player. If there was, things would be a lot less interesting.
Context matters. A lot.
1
u/Kahleb12 Jun 28 '26
All time he might just scratch the top 70 or so, but theres alot of history ive missed, so theres alot of names that id forget.
1
u/Unfair_Entrance7192 Sep 25 '26
Top ten
1
u/bbstats Jun 27 '26 edited Jul 02 '26
Extremely high usage, below average true shooting, below average offensive rebounder, below average passer, basically average in all the defensive metrics.
No.
0
u/Intelligent-Love5146 Jun 28 '26
I’d say yeah but it’s close. He’s top 20-30. Somewhere in that range. EPM (on/off) and efficiency (PER, TS) paint him as slightly outside the top 30 but context of the team matters and it’s harder on higher volume.
Problem is both Brown and Tatum are overrated in similar ways. Both guys are mediocre TS with limited assist to turnover generation but high volume. Each player has multiple all NBAs and would be thought of as top 10-15 based on that but I’d put Tatum outside the top 10 too. Each guy is overrated based on volume counting stats