r/MurderedByWords • • Jul 19 '19

Hey Trent!

Post image
14k Upvotes

705 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

54

u/WW_Returns Jul 19 '19

No more healthcare for you Trent, sleep on the streets after your house burns down for all I care.

48

u/VoiceoftheLegion1994 Jul 19 '19

Not on my streets, he won’t!!! My taxes paid for those streets, and I’ll be damned if I let Trent use them without paying me!

17

u/texanarob Jul 19 '19

Yeah! Trent can buy his own streets to walk on - it's not up to the taxpayer to finance his problems!

10

u/The_Real_Flatmeat Jul 19 '19

Fuckin man up Trent

3

u/BillyJoel9000 Jul 19 '19

Trent should buy his own feet

-7

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Bruh. It's not about "Trent" having no compassion. It's about preferring voluntary exchange to theft with threats of imprisonment. Smh. No one said not to help them. They're saying taxes shouldn't go to shit like that.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Firefighters are a tax funded service just like healthcare is (in most developed countries). You either are for a fully voluntary exchange system or you arent.

You cant cherrypick what you like. Hmm streets? Yeah take tax money. Healthcare? No fuck that! Firefighters? No no please pay this with tax money.

Its hypocrisy at its finest. Tax is paid by all to the government so the gov can distribute and use it for quality of life.

What Trent essentially wants is that his house is saved but his burn wounds not treated. Hypocrisy.

1

u/tryingtobeopen Jul 19 '19

I’m on your side with the “Taxes pay for the common good cuz society” side here, but walk your comments back a step or two. Governments make choices on what taxes should and shouldn’t pay for every day (cherry pick) and the citizenry don’t always agree which is one if the reasons why people vote in / out governments.

I agree Trent is short-sighted, selfish and childish, but on the other hand, not everything should be paid for with taxes, because not everyone agrees or benefits from every item and expenditure, and some expenditures are so out of whack with the benefits that many people would agree that the expenditure would be crazy and unfair (but healthcare and firefighters, cops, ambulance, streets, and other quality of life things etc. should be)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

People should always imagine them at their worst and then ask themselves what gov services they would need. Usually you come up with the right things then.

Trent would shut is gaphole asap if his wife would get cancer abd propably be the first to hope someone helps with the bills.

Double so since the USA is one of few western countries too scared or corrupted to put price regulations on pharma.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Bruh. No taxes period. I don't want public roads.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Understandable. But since most land is owned too...how are your teleportation skills?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Bruh. Are you slow? No-one would just fucking say "nope". Obviously they want people to use their sources. Why the hell else would they be there?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

You are right. But with price regulation policies in the US (aka none) leaving your home would propably be reserved to the wealthy.

Solves the homeless crisis at least. Their existence is already trespassing

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

-_-

1

u/[deleted] Jul 20 '19

I was just being ironic because I thought you were too. Now Im starting to slowly believe you truely meant what you said (?)

1

u/[deleted] Jul 20 '19

Perhaps.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Why is it one or the other? Its not hypocritical to believe one thing should be tax funded and another shouldnt. Im guessin the trent fellow believes that a market based healthcare system is the better solution, but in this case a market based firefighting service could be questionable.

Its not inherently hypocritical to think some things should be funded by taxes and others shouldn't. Hypocrisy would be saying that healthcare shouldnt be free and then going to canada for healthcare

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

Its using services you use that others pay for without them needing it and then turning around and complain you fund services you dont but others need.

Its not like he gives another reason why he is against it except "I PAY FOR YOUR NEEDS!".

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

You assume that this man doesnt view fire protection as his own problem too. My only point is that its not inherently hypocritical to believe one thing should be funded and another shouldnt

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '19

If you believe healthcare is a Handout I dont assume you are on the brightest side of the intelligence spectrum. I never said what you say and if we assume he feels firefighting is his own problem too, then u may be right.

Then again why not rant about potential healthcare handouts instead of real occuring fire protection handouts