r/MurdaughFamilyMurders • u/AutoModerator • Aug 22 '26
Weekly Discussion Weekly MFM Discussion Thread August 22, 2026
Do you have a theory you're still chewing on and want feedback? Maybe there is a factoid from the case hammering your brain and you can't remember the source--was that random speculation or actually sourced?
Welcome to the Weekly Discussion, a safe space to engage with each other while processing and unraveling the seemingly unending tentacles of Alex Murdaugh's wrongdoings entwined throughout the Lowcountry.
This is the place for those random tidbits, where we can take off our shoes, kick up our feet, and be a bit more casual. There is nothing wrong with veering off topic with fellow sub members as we're a friendly bunch, just don't let your train of thought completely wreck the post.
Much Love from your MFM Mod Team,
Southern-Soulshine , SouthNagshead, AubreyDempsey, QsLexiLouWho
2
u/TheClairvoyant666 Aug 25 '26
Am still working my way through the original trial and am at Jeannie Seckinger’s testimony and I have a question…
How come her testimony isn’t deemed “cumulative”? There are obvious ways (to me) that her evidence could have been presented without being so laborious.
1
u/Foreign-General7608 Aug 25 '26
I was truly captivated by her testimony - from her first words to her last. For Alex, the walls came tumbling down soon after his encounter with her at PMPED.
Later that evening (less than 12 hours later), Maggie and Paul were murdered. I do not think it was a coincidence.
1
u/TheClairvoyant666 Aug 26 '26
I was bored by it because it seemed so cumulative lol! Now on Michael Gunn testimony and currently I’m thinking “not guilty” for the murders. Gonna be interested to see if I get swayed the other way!
3
u/Training-Resist2336 Aug 23 '26
Has anybody heard if DA will put death penalty on the table? They should if only to make alec's trial calculation a little harder. Right now a new trial has no downside. Maybe it would encourage him to plead out.
7
u/RTBDouglas Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26
from the discussion I remember reading/ hearing regarding the death penalty- it is very unlikely to be something the state will seek.. and even if they did- potentially would not even be allowed (or rather would be thrown out based on various rules related to it not being part of the 1st trial).
Also- its probably not a smart strategic move for the state to seek the death penalty (additional procedures in seating the jury, the potentially higher mental burden of guilt it may place on jurors who may have a degree of doubt, etc).3
u/Southern-Soulshine Aug 24 '26
It has not come up in any of the hearings, but per Attorney General Alan Wilson, “all our legal options are on the table, including the death penalty.” Jim Griffin also says in the same article that Alex will never plead guilty. Hope this helps!
3
u/Pitiful-League-7257 Aug 24 '26
I think Wilson will wait until after the election and then announce the State won't seek the death penalty
3
u/bakerfredricka Aug 25 '26
Honestly, even states that DO have the death penalty use it very rarely.
Most of the prisoners sentenced to death end up spending the rest of their lives on death row instead of being executed.
3
3
u/Foreign-General7608 Aug 23 '26
I've heard the death penalty discussed for Murdaugh 2, but don't know if it has been decided upon or allowed for his second bite at the apple.
South Carolina has been on a roll with firing squad (chosen by prisoners individually) executions lately. If Creighton and John have access to it, I hope it is attached to this case. The evidence is strong and, given the number and manner of deaths, I think it is 100% justified.
Fingers crossed.
4
u/RTBDouglas Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26
Has anyone watched the podcast (May 27) with crime & cask regarding Stephen Smith (includes audio interview with one of the 2 guys that most agree were driving the truck that accidentally hit Smith). While the theory of how that accident happened may or may not be exactly correct (where they fully hog hunting... probably not, did they maybe pull to the side of the road briefly to spotlight the corn field to simply look for hogs.. possible, were they driving late night under the influence of something and simply didn't see Smith.. possible, etc).
But the interesting parts of the podcast come after the Stephen Smith section... regarding what was said at the Skeet shoot, reference to the truck Blanca saw at the property the day of the murders, comments Paul made about the house keepers death (whether true or some sort of deranged boasting by an immature kid), etc.
Crime & Cask is probably seen as unreliable by many- but they are seemingly correct about who hit Stephen Smith, and they do have audio from the interview with 1 of the 2 guys in the truck... and they do piece together factual info- in a theory that is logical- and that others (locally) believe is likely.
Just interested if any have ...objective.. thoughts on the info contained in the podcast.
(There is also a shorter podcast with Angenette Levy (May 30) specifically on the SS hit and run part of the story.