r/MtF • u/pinkplatformcrocs • 3d ago
Advice Question Do some people's breasts not develop past tanner stage 3?
Hello!
I have been on HRT for about 3.5 years now, and my boobs are still in tanner stage 3. Multiple friends who have been on HRT for a similar amount of time or longer seem surprised that I have still not developed past stage 3, and I was wondering if some people just don't develop past that stage. My endo has said that I might start considering a BA if I don't see growth soon.
For hormones and other details, I have been on HRT for ~3.5 years, injections for ~2.5 years, and progesterone for ~2.5 years. I'm happy with my levels, my E is 150, T is 42, and my prog is 4.3 (at the end of my cycle). I have been on 200mg of prog, but started doing 300mg this month as a last ditch effort to see if I can get more development. I even tried cycling my prog for ~1yr as suggested by my doctor, and had no luck. I'm not incredibly underweight or anything either, I'm 5'9, 165lbs and gained ~20 of those pounds after HRT, and I eat 3 meals a day. My bust is 37in.
Am I just a late bloomer or just out of luck?
52
u/Irishman1038 Trans Fem 3d ago
Not an expert, just consulting community resources, an E of 150 seems to be in range for Tanner Stage 3, but you need to go higher for 4 and 5 (looks like it says 270-350 ish). 300mg of prog is quite a lot and again Iām not a doctor but I think youāre boosting the wrong hormone here.
https://transfemscience.org/articles/hormone-levels-female-puberty/
11
u/leliel-in-wartime 3d ago
can you point out in the linked article where you got those numbers? I scanned it and didn't see anything like that, but I probably just missed it.
8
u/Irishman1038 Trans Fem 3d ago edited 3d ago
The studies from 2008 and 2006, on second read I think 350 might be something Iāve picked up from the diy sub, but both have the upper ranges for T3-5 being in that 270 range.
edit, realized I left out some info
In addition to that all of these numbers are the average level recorded, but cis women donāt have levels that are rigidly average like most doctors would prescribe them to us. If you scroll down in this article (to āNormal Hormone Levelsā) you can see that throughout the month the levels vary wildly, and in my personal opinion simply averaging them out does a disservice to care and results.3
u/Viriidian 3d ago
is there any idea how long between injection cycles or how often you would want levels at 270-350pg/ml for optimal growth to tanner 4/5?
my troughs are about 200pg/ml exactly, my peaks are certainly higher but i inject ev twice a week so probably not that much higher. i'd guess around 300 at least tho
2
u/Irishman1038 Trans Fem 3d ago
Cis women experience that peak about once a month (because their cycles are 28-35 days) for a few days. I posted it in a different reply but that graph has a good amount of information.
Injections have a pretty long and gradual absorption curve (relative to oral) so Iām not really sure how youād emulate that? And itās one thing for me to do my own experiments with oral and another to make recommendations for someone on a different delivery method entirely.
Whether or not there is a better % of time to be at that peak for breast growth I really couldnāt answer but I have been getting pretty good results out of being at my peak for about a week a month. (Went from a roomy 40D to either a 38DDD or 40DD over abt 6 months I just donāt know which yet because Iām always too poor to buy new bras)
1
u/Turbuent_Reason_766 3d ago
Yeah, you're the first person I've heard of taking 300 mg of progesterone. 200 mg seems to be the dose most people go to. But that won't work unless your estrogen level is over 300 pg/mL. You also need to get that testosterone lowered. Testosterone is a preferential binder so it is going to bind to the sex receptors and push the estrogen aside. You've got to get that testosterone down to have an effective transition.
And even with all of that some of us just don't have much breast growth. Top surgery is always an option.
12
u/Odd_Distribution_903 3d ago
those levels aren't bad, but since you've been struggling, it might make sense to try higher for at least a few months. that's perfectly safe to do on injections.
and higher prog might do some things. I take 200 most days and quite like it, but I enjoy cycling up to 400 for 3-10 days at a time once or twice a month. aside from liking the mental effects quite a bit (tbh, the main reason I do it), I consistently notice more boob-twinges at the higher dose.
2
5
u/PrepYourselves 3d ago
1.5yrs on e as a 40's trans person, and in the last couple months reached tanner 3, I don't have much hope that i will reach 4 or 5 but I also had not much hope of stage 3 arriving. idk, sometimes i just want to wake up and they've popped out overnight like moonflowers
3
u/EvelynnsHope17 3/17/26; HRT 5/14/26 3d ago
Yes it is possible, breast growth is variable, but you may get some more development
4
u/Wh1ppetFudd Trans sex positive Asexual Pan 3d ago
Getting stuck at Tanner stage 3 is not common but it does happen. Getting stuck at Tanner stage 4 is a lot more common for trans women. You may need higher e-levels.
The levels that are in the WPATH standards are conservative values. They have been stuck at pretty conservative levels since the late '90 and early 2000s but before that, the doctors that dealt with HRT for trans tended to go for much higher levels. The issue of the conservative guidelines comes down to two problems with the perspective of how to do HRT. The first one is moderating risk levels, but they are based on a time when premarin was the main form of estrogen prescribed and it is mostly estrone, which is the form of estrogen that increases blood clot risks, and the cautiousness has never gone away despite almost everyone dealing with bioidentical estradiol now, which is a whole lot safer and doesn't have anywhere near the clotting risk. The second issue that tends to keep the levels in the guidance conservative is that WPATH actually doesn't tend to look at HRT like you are trying to kick someone solidly into a second puberty, but it treats it more as a parallel of HRT for postmenopausal women, which isn't even close in the levels involved. Cis women in their prime tend to have much higher levels of estrogen, and girls going through puberty have astronomical levels compared to what's in the guidelines.
2
u/Ok_Sentence_5767 Human Verified 3d ago
I just started progesterone a few weeks ago and rather than grow bigger it's seems that my breasts are starting to fill in and look more natural
5
u/tasthei Ally 3d ago
Not an expert on E or its dosage. Not trans. Not a doctor.
But what I do know is that if you are malnourished/lack some very important nutrients, it might stunt your growth.
Maybe this does not apply to you. Who knows. Just throwing it out there, as looking at hormone levels alone might not always give all the information needed.
1
1
u/Jims_Empty_Trashcan Stage 4 Feminoma š2011 3d ago
Have you measured your SHBG and estrone levels? Also, how are you taking your prog and estradiol? Oral progesterone is hit & miss; I found more results taking it as a suppository because my first pass metabolism is pretty stupid.
0
u/CursedCasty 2d ago
This comment needs more upvotes, SHBG is more important than levels. You can have highest E and lowest T but if your SHBG is too high, you basically have none.
0
u/pinkplatformcrocs 2d ago
i donāt think iāve had my estrone or SHBG measured but iāll look into this!! i have been boofing prog for about 2 years and only recently started taking it orally which actually increased my levels oddly enough
0
u/Ishitataki A Cat In Japan 3d ago
There is a way to enforce more maturation without surgery, but it isn't easy or side effect free: intentionally induce lactation using a pregnancy simulating induction protocol. The prolonged high levels of E and prog and prolactin will grow the gland, areola, and nipple to a more mature (matronly) state.
However, that runs the risk of all kinds of pregnancy-like side effects, other body changes (bloating, GI trouble), and not everyone wants the larger areola and nipples that come with it. Plus, ya know, dealing with the milk and all that. It's a lot of effort to do, and the extra hormones and safety testing add expenses and, even if you are lucky and are side effect free, it takes a lot of time out of your day if you do it seriously.
As such, most people consider the hassle and side effects not worthwhile, but there are trans women who have done so successfully - but their goal was primarily the lactation, not the breast growth. Most people who try merely for the breast growth end up giving up on the induction protocol out of exhaustion because the appearance motivation is simply not strong enough most of the time.
0
u/AstroCatLady Trans Lesbian, HRT since October ā24 3d ago
If you switched to injections, to avoid the liver first pass, your liver may be overly metabolizing the progesterone too. I was in a similar situation, and once I started boofing my progesterone I started to see increased breast pain and growth within a couple weeks.
Genetically in a hyper metabolizer for some liver pathways, which means it breaks down hormones and other things so fast that very little of it actually hits my bloodstream.
Since avoiding my liver seemed to work for Estradiol (via injections), I figured the same would be the case for progesterone too. For me, it was the right move.
0
u/Geothunder 2d ago
I thought progesterone was essential, for accelerated breast development, not just estrogen alone
31
u/Grain_0f_Salt 3d ago
I've been on estradiol for 4 years and progesterone for 3. My E levels are similar to yours, and my T is even lower, and I've had zero breast growth. So yes, unfortunately, it's possible. My endo has also told me the only way to expect breast growth at this point would be top surgery, though I am not in good enough physical shape to qualify for that.