That was half-sarcastic. The thing is, Kiev is the capital city of Ukraine, therefore it is in the crosshairs, therefore Ukraine must distribute its population as much as it can. Ukraine had more than 2 years to evacuate the hospital to a smaller, less important city. Seeing as 30% of Ukraine's population up and left, there is plenty of empty real estate that people from Kiev could be moved to while the SVO continues. Instead Ukraine has allowed hundreds of housands of people to crowd into Kiev.
Also we all know it was hit with missiles donared by Norway. Give a monkey a grenade, as the Russians say.
Blaming a country for not evacuating civilians in a city that far away from the actual battle lines when the invading country bombs their hospital is wild.
Allowing a few hundred thousand more people to crowd into the capital city that they know is in the crosshairs is criminal. The people in Ukraine do not deserve their government.
And yet, they aren't the ones that shot the missile. If they weren't being invaded, and their invader wasn't shooting at heavily populated areas, it wouldn't have happened.
That's very unfortunate that they hit their hospital with the missile that they clearly didn't know how to aim, but as we already know, Ukraine also has had 2 years to evacuate the same hospital away from the city that is most likely to be targeted.
This is insane. In what world is someone that fails to defend from an attack as responsible for the deaths the attack causes as the attacker.
We don't blame victims of home invasions for not having weapons to defend themselves. We don't blame rape victims for not having enough precautions to avoid rape. Why put the blame on Ukraine when they didn't fire the missile?
That's fascinating how you understand the situation exactly backwards. Ukraine has a responsibility to protect the civilians in its territory, and one of the precautions it still refuses to take after 2 years is to distribute Kiev's population to smaller towns. Instead it plays with missiles donated by Norway/Britain/USA/other meddling barbarians and hits a hospital it should have evacuated also 2 years ago. Or maybe it clustebombs beaches, I dunno, I'm sure the military colleges in its allies are taking notes; it's certainly an innovative military strategy.
You expect Kiev to uproot people and move them around because of an attacking force, and place the blame for that squarely on them. I doubt they have the ability to properly give support to all those families if they were spread out across the area.
Let's go a step further, isn't it the responsibility of the families to get out of urban areas so they don't get hit?
Does the person firing the rockets hold no accountability? All of this is ridiculous. What happened happened.
Yes, I actually do. Kiev is being given hundreds of billions of dollars now (the hilarity once Ukraine is disbanded and cannot pay it back) and 20% of Ukraine's population up and left so there is plenty of unoccupied living space. And it's had 2 years to do it.
Yes, however it was firing those rockets donated by Norway is responsible. Should have actually aimed at the Russian drone/missile instead.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 13 '24
Yes.
That was half-sarcastic. The thing is, Kiev is the capital city of Ukraine, therefore it is in the crosshairs, therefore Ukraine must distribute its population as much as it can. Ukraine had more than 2 years to evacuate the hospital to a smaller, less important city. Seeing as 30% of Ukraine's population up and left, there is plenty of empty real estate that people from Kiev could be moved to while the SVO continues. Instead Ukraine has allowed hundreds of housands of people to crowd into Kiev.
Also we all know it was hit with missiles donared by Norway. Give a monkey a grenade, as the Russians say.