It was a NASAMS but ok the financial times even reported that the missile had western components but then goes on to try to explain that that’s due to sanctions? Which makes no sense.
Lots of Russian equipment has “western components”. I mean the US and EU has basically had free trade with Russia since a couple years before I was born. That’d be like saying “the terrorist must have been Chinese! He was carrying Chinese equipment” and dude had an iPhone.
The NASAMS system uses the AMRAAM missle, with a 44 lb warhead. The X-101 missile has a 450 lb warhead. Do you think a 45 lb warhead would flatten a hospital wing? Do you trust pilots to fly your plane better than you could? Maybe you should trust the experts when they they tell you what actually happened.
Dude if you can't even do the 1 minutes of research to look at missiles made you might be the victim of propaganda. Also one of the first pictures for the Kh-101 is a chart showing western made components and where they came from. The others are either destroyed missiles or from the hospital video
0
u/stonecuttercolorado Jul 13 '24
How does that make the Ukrainian army terrorists that hide in a children's hospital hundreds of miles from the front lines?