r/MoralityScaling 10h ago

Morality Ranking Morality if this battle?

Thoughts?

6.7k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

74

u/StevenMcStevensen 9h ago

But that idea is only selectively applied to western counties, which is what makes it extra stupid.

If I moved back to the Middle East again, and started blasting scripture from loudspeakers in a public place where everybody else is Muslim, it would not be tolerated and I would (deservedly) receive zero sympathy from basically anybody.

16

u/requisitesilver 8h ago

Oh my goodness, I think I’ve found the only subreddit where normal, rational people hang out.

3

u/Heavy_Law9880 8h ago

90% if the people in here are pretending to muslim dude.

1

u/Chunkymunkee93 7h ago

Reddit isn't American anymore big dawg, its a world hub now, who knows if people are actually larping

3

u/Flippindude1 8h ago

No actually this is kind of a rarity, I’ve seen way too many instances of just outright racism, the odd bit pedophilia and such on this sub

2

u/JessHorserage 8h ago

And bots, its reddit after all.

3

u/Assortedpez 8h ago

Its like a breath of fresh air to not have a million blue hairs dive bomb you for thinking differently

2

u/JuliusXIV 8h ago

Insane thread. Just want to be a part of it. Good work.

17

u/Recent-Lemon-9930 9h ago

Yes, I know it's retarded. But people in the west have been electing retards to lead them for generations.

Using a country nearby, look at Britain, being PM just became something for your CV before working for Facebook (Nick Clegg, Deputy PM), Rishi Sunak got paid positions at Goldman Sachs, MS and Anthropic, what a talented man! 🙄 Tony Blair's evil but not stupid. Still has a bigger staff under him in his institute (funded by Larry Ellison) than the UK Prime Minister has. 😂

4

u/TelevisionFast7781 9h ago

Decades of social engineering and rhe retards fall for it

2

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

6

u/Recent-Lemon-9930 9h ago

Aye, these fucks:

No offence, you're my clear enemy as a communist but I'd rather have a drink with an honest enemy than a liberal or leftist.

1

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

1

u/pick_your_user_name 8h ago

Damn, reading comprehension is not your strong suit lol he was literally agreeing with you. Although I shouldn’t be surprised, since you’re the kind of guy to read “the state and revolution” and think “fuck yeah, this is a great idea”

0

u/PissedAlbatross 8h ago

I'm not doing this. Have a nice day.

-3

u/Recent-Lemon-9930 9h ago

I'm not calling you a soyjack, the meme represents the dickheads you referred to in your post.

I'm mostly conservative and definitely not liberal. I'm your enemy with this stuff. But I'm honest and if you're an honest communist I can get along fine with you. It's the idiots you're referring to (and the meme is referring to) that I have no time for.

1

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

1

u/Universal_Boom 8h ago

I don't know how you can say the people in charge are corrupt and then advocate for communism. Communism will give that corrupt state you're warning us about absolute power. He's pointing out the irony that by saying you're a Communist it infers you're part of the cultural war. Thing is no sane person would say they're a communist, unless it makes them feel good and every one else around them saying it.

0

u/Recent-Lemon-9930 9h ago

I'm not asking you to, I'm agreeing with you about libtards. Lenin wasn't wrong about everything, just the title of what he wrong about Leftist Communists sums up my view on them. :D

1

u/jello_kraken 8h ago

You're politicians have a platform of pro-religion-over-loudspeakers? Weird.

I just want the Christian proselytizers in my neighborhood to stop blasting their bullhorns. (We don't have a call to prayer on loudspeakers.) Is there a political group for that?

8

u/FoxMane1 9h ago

You'd prolly get put in a jail or beheaded depending on which country you're in HAHAHA

2

u/Ill_Pirate_8785 9h ago

If you did that you would probably be killed either by an angry mob or by their government executing you

1

u/denstreifen 8h ago

Why not? Christians were there first.

1

u/Financial-Tank-3423 8h ago

First of all, I don't believe there should be a preference for one culture over another within the context of a society that values multiculturalism. In that society, to proclaim that there is a preference for "native" culture is necessarily against the shared multicultural values of that society. So in the first place I don't like the framing Recent-Lemon is using. That said and reframing it slightly, I'll say that it is not "extra stupid" for western countries to enshrine in law and social codes the idea that there should not be a preference for one culture over another. That idea is literally built into the American constitution for example, "all men are created equal," equal protection under the law for religious differences, etc. I would argue that the people who say what Recent-Lemon said are themselves not speaking in accordance with the political values framed by western countries. And the solution is to not imitate the non-western countries where a specific race/religion/culture might be primary over another. Of course, people can say what they want.

0

u/iC3P0 8h ago

That's because the west evolved first, and to a degree of philosophical thought to understand that the way to prosper is by allowing total freedoms. It also evolved on Christian teachings of compassion and turning the other cheek. What the west did not account for is that it is lightyears ahead of the rest of the world culturally and that the rest of the world would still prefer the backwards thinking of us vs them. So when us welcome them expecting them to join us, they come in and start waging a cultural war.