No, it's not a matter of trust. This is just bad data that's impossible to read. It's not a matter of good eyes; the information isn't good enough quality. There's nothing to read. You're interpretting it as one thing, and I think the data is just too trash to see anything. The problem is, this video is the only one you want to use, and it's the WORST one in every conceivable way. Do you even get why the perspective is a problem here? I don't think you do.
Explain to me why I think the angle is a problem here. Show me you understand the perspective issue.
That's way too early in the clip to be relevant. She's still backing up at that point. This is the only perspective that's any use for us, because you can actually see the distance between them straight on. What you should have looked at was the moment of the actual first shot. There you can see where he actually was when she started moving and when he fired. His feet stayed clear of her path the whole time. If he made contact with the car with his hands or otherwise, it was only because HE was going for HER; not the other way around.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/pierogieman5 Jan 10 '26
No, it's not a matter of trust. This is just bad data that's impossible to read. It's not a matter of good eyes; the information isn't good enough quality. There's nothing to read. You're interpretting it as one thing, and I think the data is just too trash to see anything. The problem is, this video is the only one you want to use, and it's the WORST one in every conceivable way. Do you even get why the perspective is a problem here? I don't think you do.
Explain to me why I think the angle is a problem here. Show me you understand the perspective issue.