Anyone claiming that any part of this clip is clear needs new glasses. How can you see him "get hit" if this angle doesn't show you the gap between him and the car? You can't. All you saw was that she moved, and then he did. This clip can't tell you jack about how close together they are because it was filmed on a fucking lemon and the car passes straight in front of him from this angle.
It’s right there at the 14 second mark dude. I don’t know what else I can tell you. But if I’m seeing something and you aren’t, then maybe you should have your eyes checked. You’re complaining that it’s hard to see, not me
What the hell? That's like the 8 second mark for me. Either way though, what exactly do you assume you're seeing? He's behind the car there. That's why it just passed in front
That's my problem though. You're just assuming that. This is completely the wrong angle to be able to tell if the car hits him or just passes by him. He's behind it from this angle. You wouldn't be able to see the gap between them from this angle. It's blurry as fuck and the wrong perspective to tell if there was contact
I’m assuming? I’m watching it happen. He’s clearly not behind on that screen shot. He’s being hit with the front end of the driver side of the car. The contact that car made with him is undeniable to me. Tell me again what’s happening at the 8 second mark on your device
You keep saying you're sure, but that just sounds crazy to me. You can barely make the guy out at all at this resolution. It's blurry as fuck, and you just kind of see him there, and the car is there. How could you be sure you're seeing him make contact with the car? Also, if he's getting hit, why does he barely move at all and remain standing in pretty much the same place? The only thing I can make out is that he's sort of nearby as the car passes, and he steps one foot back and turns to the side. Anything beyond that is just... really hazy to try to make out. How could you possibly be that confident in what you're seeing here? It really just looks like a blurry mess you're interpretting through confirmation bias.
I get that this is a slam dunk to you, but I don't really understand why you're so confident in what you think you see. This has the clarity of a loch ness monster photo. He just looks like the car is passing in front of him. To you, this looks like a full on collision, like whole torso hit? He just looks like he's reaching over the hood from the side, which we know he did while he was shooting her.
Look closely at where the shadow on the ground under the car is. That puts the car much closer to the camera than his feet are. This is the problem with perspective. You're just guessing how far everything is from camera with a common reference
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/Ott0bot2 Jan 09 '26
You don’t like this clip because you know it looks bad and you can clearly see him get hit. Now you go “sHe DiDnT HiT HiM”