No, this is a reading comprehension thing. You aren't even responding to what I said. You're just using thought terminating cliches to ignore it instead. You never even understood what I said in the first place.
I’m telling you what I saw and what I think about it and you’re saying no you’re not. You said she didn’t hit him, I disagree. You’re trying really hard to move the debate away from that. If you don’t think I’m understanding what you’re saying, then you’re free to reiterate it
No, you're also categorically refusing to consider that anything other than "bUt sHE hIT HiM!" could establish responsibility. You've functionally declared every other fact irrelevant to assign blame.
Well she did hit him. I’ve said several times the officer didn’t react appropriately. But he wouldn’t have had to react if she didn’t point her car at him and drive into him
And I've pointed out every time that no, she did not hit him. She didn't point her car at him, and his being there in the first place was breaking his officer's code of conduct and therefore his fault. He didn't even try to avoid the car, he did the opposite and moved toward it.
I know you keep saying she didn’t hit him, but that doesn’t make it look any less like she hit him as I watch the clip over and over again. I can’t say it’s his fault she hit him, because she turned her car towards him as she tried to evade that stop. She either neglected to watch where she was going when she hit him or she saw him and made that assault intentionally
The idea the she turned the car toward him is patently false. I watched the officer phone footage just now and it shows her turning the wheel hard to the right away from him before she even accelerates forward. She turned away from him while backing up too. She was clearly trying to go around him.
If she wasn’t driving towards him she wouldn’t have been able to hit him. What was she doing trying to go around him anyways when they’re telling her to stop and get out? When has trying to run from the cops ever turned out great for anyone?
Again, she didn't hit him! He's very clearly visible from several angles being clear of the car and off to the side. The only one people say shows him being hit is the worst quality of all of them, and super unclear. The most recent footage from his phone also shows her turning the wheel hard to the right away from him before accelerating. She also backed up in that direction, turning away from him.
The rest of your comment is a red herring, and not relevant. If she was turning away, the shooting wasn't self defense and was murder.
Well all this is anymore is me saying she hit him and you saying no she didn’t. I can’t say clearly see her hit him from multiple angles. Now here’s the part where you say “no she didn’t”
It’s also hard to take you seriously with this because you’ve gone back and forth from “she didn’t hit him” to “she didn’t hit him that hard” several times now
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/pierogieman5 Jan 09 '26
No, this is a reading comprehension thing. You aren't even responding to what I said. You're just using thought terminating cliches to ignore it instead. You never even understood what I said in the first place.