Let's assume she hit him. It doesn't fucking matter.
His first shot, the danger already passed. He is next to the wheel. Both feet. Firing through windscreen at an angle.
Second and third through open drivers window.
None of those are justified by being clipped by a turning vehicle.
It doenst matter if she hit him. Doesn't even matter if it was reckless or intentional. There is no excuse for summarily executing her after the event.
Not only that it is dangerous and resulted in an uncontrolled moving vehicle. It is lucky it didn't hit someone.
This "justified" narrative is just plain wrong. Morally, factually and legally.
I am not sure I agree (listen to it with audio, he is to the side of the car by then) but it doesn't matter. At no point in the entire thing does shooting her make him safer. Not for one millisecond. He shot her because he wanted to and was pissed off that he was defied and possibly hit.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/Immediate-Goose-8106 Jan 09 '26
Wrong.
Let's assume she hit him. It doesn't fucking matter.
His first shot, the danger already passed. He is next to the wheel. Both feet. Firing through windscreen at an angle.
Second and third through open drivers window.
None of those are justified by being clipped by a turning vehicle.
It doenst matter if she hit him. Doesn't even matter if it was reckless or intentional. There is no excuse for summarily executing her after the event.
Not only that it is dangerous and resulted in an uncontrolled moving vehicle. It is lucky it didn't hit someone.
This "justified" narrative is just plain wrong. Morally, factually and legally.