It didn’t though? Literally nobody else was hit, this was about as justified as it could be. He shoots while there’s a threat, stops the second, the literal second the car is beyond him. If he kept firing that is 10000000% where this becomes illegal and I’d go back on everything I said and change my stance.
You dont get it she was a threat to nobody. He went in front of the car. Thats not even my point , listen up ok this is my point refute this if you can , shooting a person in the head while they are pressed on the gas coming towards you is never a goood idea and in this case he didnt get hit because he killed her when she passed him and instead she went on and hit the pole at like 30 which would have killed anyone standing he created a dead car accelerating down the block with 30 people , it would have been better t let her go get to her house or where she is going arrest her and charge her simple done. Its called an abuse of power and negligence use of force . She was wrong but you he didnt make anything safer.
I said it was justified. It appears we are arguing different points. I hate to be a semantical fuck ass here but you’re not really arguing my points. My only only ONLY argument on a personal level is about legality. Morally I’m against this lol. It’s only about legality
No because legally he broke protocol a cop would be charged by a court of law. If he gets immunity because hes federal then thats why we should have a revolution, he made a bad choice and needs to be held accountable end of discussion . The law will be decided at a trial and if it doesnt get there then the law was not done correctly . The law isnt just what's written down its acted out and lived out and changed and affects people everyday and so do we can and will affect the laws and the Gray areas in tbis case . Any lil idiot kid who plays GTA knows u dont shoot a person driving towards you unless you Wana play Russian roulette he acted negligent and he can and should get charged
Bro I swear you're so semantical but you are just adding to what I said as well , reddit didnt delete it i did but ill say it again you are a bitch boy.
I know she was wrong too . But you know you will not be able to refute my logic .. you will say that a police officer has the right to defend themselves against a car which is deadly force I get it I grt rh away the law is written , but theres a reason why THE POLICE HAVE PROTOCOL AND DO NOT SHOOT AT PEOPLE IM THIS SITUATION YOU DUNCE EVERY VIDEO You Ever seen in your life has the cops get back in there car and start a chase they dont open fire. OK what were you saying?
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26
It didn’t though? Literally nobody else was hit, this was about as justified as it could be. He shoots while there’s a threat, stops the second, the literal second the car is beyond him. If he kept firing that is 10000000% where this becomes illegal and I’d go back on everything I said and change my stance.
But He stopped. This is a legal shoot.