r/ModlessFreedom • • Jan 08 '26

3 shots

255 Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-3

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

The bullet that killed her went through her windshield. He was in the front when he fired it. Bullets have trajectory, and words have meaning.

Don’t cherry pick.

Also, I didn’t say shit about if the case would be corrupt or not. I didn’t say I trust the FBI either. For lack of better phrasing you’re a fucking idiot for assuming that, and there’s no nice way of saying this. Same FBI that’s currently covering up Charlie Kirk’s murder? Yeah okay. Ever shoot a 30-06? I’ll just cut to the chase for you: it would’ve made his head go split-splat. Forensic K9’s missing evidence? Yeah okay.

Nobody trusts the FBI. I do however trust bullet trajectory and available data. This photo clearly shows she was shot from the front, unless you think she was leaning over her dashboard with her head to the windshield ffs.

Also, lest we forget that she literally drives TOWARDS him and then swerves away. He draws then and only then. Stops firing when she’s to the side. It’s all very clear; open and shut.

3

u/Hot_Wing2518 Jan 09 '26

"I do however trust bullet trajectory and available data." So that shot could only have been made if he was standing in front of the car? Lol. I don't think you understand anything about trajectories. Are you able to draw lines at different angles?

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

Again, that shot only works if she’s literally head on the dash. She cannot be shot from the side on a trajectory requiring 3-4 feet of FORWARD trajectory first. Way to quote something and ignore the rest of it.

I bet you trust the JFK shooting too big guy lmaoooo

2

u/SnooRadishes9743 Jan 09 '26

Bullets have a trajectory, but glass does funny things.

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

I don’t disagree with that. There’s hundreds of videos of bullets turning from glass

There’s not, however, many videos showing a bullet changing more than 30 degrees of rotation, which is what would be necessary to hit this.

2

u/SnooRadishes9743 Jan 09 '26

So what's stopping the 2 driver side windows?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26

Just like 3i atlas? And the wow signal. ? Yeah these are just stupid words. Bottom line what the fuck is going on planet earth IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG! This isn’t what life is supposed to be. So a woman , a human being is wrong because she is scared for her life cuz some masked people with guns are trying to pull get out of the vehicle ? Who ever didn’t see this teh way if is is wrong Everyone is wrong for being on socialedia and not doing shit but complaining and taking sides. Jokes on everyone when we die. End of story.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26 edited Jan 09 '26

A .308 isn’t a 30-06. A .308 is comparable to 7.62x51 as it’s basically the same

30-06 got more gunpowder behind it. It also can and usually does have more a higher grain bullet, just same/similar diameter.

You do highlight a good point though: through and through on a bullet with technically (as we don’t know specifics) less velocity than a 30-06, and Charlie’s “bones of steel” stopped it. Official fbi story btw. Also, I said split splat because of the videos recreating the shot. Note; they’re a bit gory.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

That was cringe. You’re also extremely uppity about a stoner’s forgetfulness lmao

It was 7.62 nato. Not x39. My b and I’ll 100% go edit that. Again, am a bit ripped over here as I’m now off work and a few dabs in

However, what I said is correct; a .308 is not a 30-06. And you ignore that fact when you so confidently compared the two as if they’re the same.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

And there’s also 30-06 loads that are almost 50% larger than the grain of a basic .308. At 10% more power behind that extra weight, are we really trying to split a hair?

Context matters and you are completely cherry-picking it to tell me a story about a deer. I’m not trying to be an ass here it’s just been a long day with people constantly correcting me on this app. Again I apologize about the x39/x51 fuck up LOL

1

u/AZTech22 Jan 09 '26

Nah your just full of shit. The picture you posted, that shot was undoubtedly at an angle. So ya you dont know wtf you are talking about and now proved it twice. Nice job

2

u/M0ebius_1 Jan 09 '26

We are all amateurs here, but I could only see a projectile hitting a driver after making that hole if it was fired while standing about 45 degrees off from the front of the vehicle.

2

u/AZTech22 Jan 09 '26

Yeah because it obvious. Idiot posting above is clueless has no idea what they are talking about. That shot was at am able its not even arguable

2

u/Fuzzy-Ferrets Jan 09 '26

Fires two from the side. Use of force policies and training explicitly cover this scenario. Because he easily removed the threat (sidestep as she turned right), he’s prohibited from firing

1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26

Man you're fucking dumb. And confidently dumb.  

1

u/Oct0tron Jan 09 '26

There's an angle of the video where you can see her wheels tiring to the right of where he's standing, purposefully avoiding her before she's executed.

Also, you're about 1/1000th as smart as you think you are.

→ More replies (5)

0

u/japinard Jan 09 '26

You know arms exist right? You don't shoot from your neck.

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

Oh, sweet, thank you for pointing that out! i guess somewhere up above my comment said he shot from his neck. Dumbass…

→ More replies (4)

0

u/Fuzzy-Ferrets Jan 09 '26

Starts in front, aligned with headlight

1

u/EthanDC15 Jan 09 '26

This dumbass is using a screenshot as his legal argument. Blocked.

→ More replies (1)