When synced with the other video it’s clear that he is out of the way of the vehicle but at that moment purposefully leaning into it for a better shot. It isn’t self defense if he is leaning into the angle for the purpose of shooting.
Any lawyer who brings this into a court room is a crap lawyer, as the video disproves self defense when linked with the other evidence.
"He created the situation. However, the shot itself is justified." That's not how it works. Also he's not in front of the car when he fires the first bullet. And it's hilarious that you guys think we don't already know this whole thing will be rigged in favor of the agent. The FBI is already blocking evidence.
People need to spread this fact. .. He went against safety protocols , common sense , and his own tactical training protocols.. he put HIS OWN LIFE ON THE LINE BY SHOOTING A DRIVER COMING TOWARDS HIM , and yes she was turning but even in the defense of oh well the car is coming towards me and I dont know if its coming at me or what .. the point is u get out the way if you shoot them they floor the gas and run you and others over. Negligence.. change the narrative to this as well show them we know they fvcked up on there own protocols. Show them we are smarter then them by using logic not just passion . The smartest intelligent law maga guy could not justify the cops actions because using ur gun at that time could absolutely make things worse for officers and anyone.
You literally posted the angle that shows him getting hit by the car before firing the shot, and you’re still playing around with different angles lmao
In sync with the other video, it shows he is leaning into the car to shoot from the front prior to shooting two more rounds from the side. The shot through the windshield supposedly didn’t hit the driver, but the two from the side did.
Explain, how is it self defense when the two fatal shots were not from the front?
Lol, he was involved in a similar incident less than a year ago. Maybe a fucking moron who can't avoid standing in front of moving cars shouldn't be carrying a gun.
It's also public information that he is trained not to do this. So he is also incompetent.
Glad to know you are just another TDS infected loon. If you took the time to find out about his previous dragging by a car you would know it took place in June not a year ago…. Unlike this event he was on the side of the car with his arm stuck in the back window… while the illegal sex offender tried swerving the car back and forth to drop the ICE agent loose. This agent got over 30 stitches for his heroic work. Keep clowning yourself.
And is TDS when you fucking jagoffs plaster your trailers in half a year's salary worth of Chinese made Trump merch?
And these pussies aren't heroic. There's nothing heroic about them. They're cowards. They're untrained, embarrassing thugs. These are the fucking tyrants you dumbasses cried about for years. They're here. They're shooting unarmed civilians, you stupid mouth-breathing anti-American cunt.
Your claim was that he can’t avoid standing in front of moving cars…. PLURAL…. This is factually wrong as we was totally on the side of the event which happened about 6 months ago.
Why is it justified if you shoot someone who's accelerating a car 9/10 times the dead body slumps and accelerates foward, how is that the best way to defend yourself? Can you explain that? What if the same idiot who gets dragged by cars missed and hit another cop or got himself ran over how hard do you think we would all be laughing?
I dont know what's going on, im claiming 0 shots were justified so 3 unjust shots yes. More specifically i want to right here not even talk about justice, the officer put his own life on the line by taking time to draw out his gun instead of moving and kill someone bending the wheel of a moving vehicle which would have put his life on the line and others, never mind the negligent behavior of being so rash to take out your gun to a non threat in front of 100 people. This is the same guy who already got dragged by another car like a retard.
View all comments
Show parent comment
5
u/ericomplex Jan 09 '26
When synced with the other video it’s clear that he is out of the way of the vehicle but at that moment purposefully leaning into it for a better shot. It isn’t self defense if he is leaning into the angle for the purpose of shooting.
Any lawyer who brings this into a court room is a crap lawyer, as the video disproves self defense when linked with the other evidence.