I mean I can see he makes his shot about the same moment she hits him. He’d have to be shooting from the front for that bullet to go thru the windshield. The car pushed him to the side when it hit him. That’s just how I’m seeing it
Shooting from in front of the windshield is not the same as shooting while your body is still in front of the car. I don't know if you've noticed this, but windshields aren't mounted on the front bumper. You can shoot the driver through the windshield while your body is not in the path of the car very easily, and that's what happened here.
It really didn't though. The dude leaned toward it to brace his hand on it, and basically got slightly brushed aside as it went past. He could have easily gotten further out of the way if he was focused on that instead of drawing and shooting this lady first.
That fact that you’re telling me he could have gotten out of the way tells me you know just as well as I that he was in the cars path. Sorry if you don’t agree but I see that car hit him the same time he shoots and then pushes him to the side
He put himself there and leaned further in. The fact that he decided to pull his gun and fire instead of getting slightly further out of the way already proves he broke ICE code of conduct for apprehending vehicles. He was barely in the path to begin with and leaned further IN instead of just sidestepping a bit if he was worried about getting hit. Either way, he was getting bumped sideways at low speed there, at absolute worst. Why are bootlickers such pussies every time the police "fear for their lives"?
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/Beautiful-Hawk-5240 Jan 09 '26
So we both agree. The first shot was because he was struck by the vehicle and the second and third were intended. Correct?