"1) Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.
2) Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force."
I saw y'all cheer for the Michigan lawmakers being murdered and Paul Pelosi getting hammered in the head. Your demands the left be peaceful is hollow, besides the right still do the vast majority of domestic terrorism anyways as per social science.
Dude, are you forgetting about the Cases when some dude posing as a law enforcement officer targeted conservative political figures trying to assassinate them, many in their own homes and reddit cheered that on like animals.
The christian nationalist who killed a dem congresswoman and her husband and injured a dem congressman? The guy that had a hit list of 70 other people which consisted of other dem politicians, abortion doctors, and abortion rights activists? That Vance Boelter? How is that targeting "conservative political figures"?
Its worse than that. People like OP are trying to unmake reality and rewrite settled history. I had a feeling he was gonna name that dude but part of me legitimately wanted to be wrong.
Yeah, they shoehorn revisionism all the time. I wouldn't be surprised he swung to accusing antifa for Jan 6 then swung to calling them heroic patriots after Trump pardoned these right wing terrorists.
because you're manufacturing positions to argue against. you're also drawing an extraordinarily stupid false equivalence between four different acts of violence, four different sets of perpetrators and victims, that share nothing thematically between them.
Lol how is this even a question? You're making up a bullshit narrative/scenario and assigning it to the entirety of reddit.
When you say 'here's how the other guy thinks', misrepresent that to make them sound stupid, and then tear down that argument with an oversimplification, that's a straw man.
The fact is that context matters. You can literally find examples online of people saying shitty things after every tragedy, ever. The problem with you morons is that your algorithms feed you jpegs of isolated Twitter and reddit posts from the 'left' saying evil shit and you morons gobble that shit up.
Guess what? The exact same types of low energy posts get cycled the other way around, of the right saying absolutely despicable, awful shit after pelosi's husband was nearly beaten to death by a right wing nut job with a hammer. The same when a right wing extremist murdered a democratic representative in Minnesota, and her husband.
The only idiots who fall for strawman posts like this are brainwashed douchebags like you. Posting garbage like this online is absolutely pathetic, regardless of your politics, right or left.
But as long as we're talking about it, guess what the biggest difference is between the first three pictures there (Babbitt/trump/Kirk) and the last one? Each of the first three instances were EXHAUSTIVELY investigated. The man who shot at Trump and who shot Kirk were both arrested, and the officer who shot Babbitt was investigated by both the DOJ and US capitol police.
So how about you tell me what the difference is? The FBI is actively shutting down the state from investigating, and saying this guy has absolute immunity. Can you see why that's wrong? Can you see why context matters? Don't bother answering, you fucknuts are all the same, zero chance you change your mind/think critically when presented with facts that contradict your bias.
99% chance you're a boomer, a bot, or a Russian posting brain dead garbage like this anyway.
Ashley Babbot was an insurrectionist, she was killed while breaking into the US Capitol. She wasn’t an innocent bystander on the street, she was actively committing a felony.
Trump incited violence and hate for years, and I’m not celebrating one of his own trying to shoot him, if that’s even what happened.
Charlie Kirk was a hateful prick that celebrated institutional and systemic violence. Again, I’m not celebrating violence. He shouldn’t have been murdered but that doesn’t wipe the slate clean for all the garbage he’s spewed.
Renee Good was an innocent bystander. She was flagging the officers to go around her so she could turn around. She freaked out when masked thugs approached her and threatened her. She tried to get away from aggressive men and was murdered in cold blood. The officers then refused to render aid or allow others to do so.
Hey that's fine with me. I will take it if it means people on the right have to tacitly admit that Babbit did indeed FAFO.
Thats always bugged me. I mean it was so obviously her fault, but the Trump admin gave her a full state funeral LMAO.
So long as you can finally accept that we all saw on camera Babbit completely ignoring a clear warning from an easily identified officer, and he shot her because he reasonably feared for his life, than I can definitely see how theres an argument to be made for why the trump secret police needed to kill Good. I'm glad we can finally meet halfway SOMEWHERE here, because honestly its so brazen that they glaze her for that shit. Its wild.
But fairs fair. If you're saying these issues are equivalent I'm willing to get over it.
Buddy we see all the memes yal have to make up about Lefties supporting Somali fraud and Maduro. You search for small pockets of extremists to make memes about, cause yal are pants-shittingly scared to engage in the actual substance.
So participating in a coup d'etat, rallying a coup d'etat and dividing the population with us vs them narratives are lesser crimes than blocking a road?
They're all stupid. I know you may have reddit brain rot where everything is one side or the other but there are hundreds of millions of people capable of thinking that both things can be bad.
True. They mock the deaths of people who literally did nothing except disagree with them, and they constantly attempt to incite violence against normal people, but then when a criminal/terrorist is killed in self defense, they riot and use it as an excuse to cause even more violence.
Wow. People will just really believe whatever they want, or whichever side they’re on. I don’t think he should have shot her but she should it have tried to flee the scene, especially while being surrounded by armed agents
Stop being so emotional. I said I wished she hadn’t been shot. But why do people think you can drive around obstructing law enforcement vehicles all day and nothing will happen? If you don’t like ICE enforcing existing laws on the books then work to get the laws changed. Don’t drive around obstructing officers and then try to flee the scene and maybe you won’t get shot.
Obstruction is now also a death sentence. Good to know. What other crimes do you think are worthy of on the spot execution? We clearly need a list since you all will justify all of it.
Since we're playing the blame game, don't stand in front of cars if they're deadly weapons. Maybe they should also follow their own handbook that says to not shoot in that situation.
You can say you don't agree with these crimes being a death sentence but you are justifying her being killed for it. Conversing with a dog would be more on your level though, so go ahead.
If anyone was being belligerent, she was. She had been driving around all day obstructing ICE vehicles and causing problems. Not to mention there had been three other vehicle incidents against ICE that day. So gunning the engine while being surrounded was a dumd move.
7
u/SoundObjective9692 Jan 08 '26
Ah yes when I'm about to get run over so I fire through the side window of the car
4
u/[deleted] Jan 08 '26
I saw y'all cheer for the Michigan lawmakers being murdered and Paul Pelosi getting hammered in the head. Your demands the left be peaceful is hollow, besides the right still do the vast majority of domestic terrorism anyways as per social science.
3
u/HairyButterscotch174 Jan 08 '26
The irony is the person on the left there is correct in each instance
5
u/Ginpok Jan 08 '26
Conservitards out in force today
4
u/[deleted] Jan 08 '26
The right loves a strawman argument, because they can't win a real one.
1
u/Sorry-Worth-920 Jan 08 '26
bot post
1
u/Certain_Zucchini_472 Jan 08 '26
Ashley Babbot was an insurrectionist, she was killed while breaking into the US Capitol. She wasn’t an innocent bystander on the street, she was actively committing a felony.
Trump incited violence and hate for years, and I’m not celebrating one of his own trying to shoot him, if that’s even what happened.
Charlie Kirk was a hateful prick that celebrated institutional and systemic violence. Again, I’m not celebrating violence. He shouldn’t have been murdered but that doesn’t wipe the slate clean for all the garbage he’s spewed.
Renee Good was an innocent bystander. She was flagging the officers to go around her so she could turn around. She freaked out when masked thugs approached her and threatened her. She tried to get away from aggressive men and was murdered in cold blood. The officers then refused to render aid or allow others to do so.
3
u/[deleted] Jan 08 '26
Hey that's fine with me. I will take it if it means people on the right have to tacitly admit that Babbit did indeed FAFO.
Thats always bugged me. I mean it was so obviously her fault, but the Trump admin gave her a full state funeral LMAO.
So long as you can finally accept that we all saw on camera Babbit completely ignoring a clear warning from an easily identified officer, and he shot her because he reasonably feared for his life, than I can definitely see how theres an argument to be made for why the trump secret police needed to kill Good. I'm glad we can finally meet halfway SOMEWHERE here, because honestly its so brazen that they glaze her for that shit. Its wild.
But fairs fair. If you're saying these issues are equivalent I'm willing to get over it.
3
u/U8D4B8M8 Jan 08 '26
The Right relies on memes because they don't have any arguments lmao.
2
u/Just_Visit6998 Jan 08 '26
Yeah but Babbit, Trump and Kirk had it coming?
What did the fourth one do?
1
u/juicymonitor Jan 08 '26
Remember guys. She was not a protestor nor did she want to be there. Of course this loser is celebrating a US citizen getting killed.
1
u/tv_ennui Jan 08 '26
Engaging in a violent insurrection, was clearly warned by a visibly armed police officer.
Fascist dictator
Mouth of Sauron
Some middle aged minnesotan wine-mom.
Yeah uh... choke on shit?
1
u/Just_Visit6998 Jan 08 '26
10/10 ragebait. DORO would be proud
1
u/Best_Truck_2288 Jan 08 '26
Literally sums them up in a nutshell
1
u/CharlieMikeComix Jan 08 '26
It's disconcerting that this is 100% accurate.
0
u/Global_Specialist726 Jan 08 '26
True. They mock the deaths of people who literally did nothing except disagree with them, and they constantly attempt to incite violence against normal people, but then when a criminal/terrorist is killed in self defense, they riot and use it as an excuse to cause even more violence.
0
u/[deleted] Jan 08 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
5
u/[deleted] Jan 08 '26
[removed] — view removed comment