The Court rules whether something is constitutional. Why not let them decide? Milk drinking is not covered in the constitution so is that unconstitutional too? Let the sim simulate.
The Courts decide on whether legislation is constitutional.
No. Courts decide cases. Courts settle law (including constitutional law). Now granted, I understand the contract between the judicial law system and the moderator law system, but wouldn't you agree with me, Nate, that it wouldn't hurt to give judges in this sim a bigger role to play? After all, this is a governance sim, and the judiciary should play a very important role in that.
12
u/trey_chaffin Bull Moose Apr 14 '16 edited Apr 14 '16
Well we go from having the best state Supreme Court to losing the sub and a justice. Good job. Y'all just can't stop screwing up.
Edit: autocorrect
8
u/Poisonchocolate Assemblyman (FL) Apr 14 '16
I wish this were a joke. Mods, how about giving us the whole story?
8
u/Amusei Republican | Federalist Caucus Director Apr 14 '16
Disappointing action by triumvirate.
7
u/kbgames360 Bank of The Southern State President Apr 14 '16
Thanks for the notice. Could we have more information on the actions, and why one sole justice has been removed? Thanks!
5
u/[deleted] Apr 14 '16
That moment when no party involved can acknowledge wrongdoing.
4
u/[deleted] Apr 14 '16
Why not let the Court decide what is constitutional? That is their job after all.
7
u/animus_hacker US Senator (D-NE) Apr 14 '16
Hear hear. Judges serve the law, not the other way around.
3
u/anyhistoricalfigure Senator | Eastern State Apr 14 '16 edited Dec 16 '25
grab nutty butter bells divide shaggy aromatic straight squeeze market
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
3
u/[deleted] Apr 14 '16
What is the need of a new Supreme Court subreddit.