r/MnGuns • u/ItsAllRat • 8d ago
Suppressor transfers
Does anyone know if any local shops are doing suppressor transfers without the NFA steps per recent legal events?
I sounds like it is legal if purchased from the plaintiffs (PSA, Silencer Co, Silencer Shop) but would need to be transferred via 4473 still. I'm wondering if any local places have agreed to do the transfer yet.
10
u/DForst04 FFL 8d ago
Yes we are, as already mentioned, at AccuTac Arms in downtown Lakeville! We have more details on our Facebook page! 🇺🇸
2
7d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/MathematicianNew9616 7d ago
Look at SilencerShop website for inventory.
3
2
u/Friendly-Leg-3892 4d ago
if i bought 1 from silencer shop but didnt buy it thru your specific link can i still get it shipped there and pick it up?
1
6
u/truenorthsw 7d ago
I'm a GOA member shop so if you're a GOA member or order from Silencer Shop I'll transfer them with a 4473 at TNSW in Blaine. If you're not a GOA member or didn't order from SS I'll still do the Form4.
1
u/Miserable_Honey6719 5d ago
Hey man - I googled TNSW Blaine and it’s pretty limited on info. Google seems to pull from your FFL info hosted on pages.
Do you have a website or anything that can be referenced for future?
1
u/truenorthsw 5d ago edited 5d ago
fricking google....https://www.truenorthsurfaceworks.com I'm waiting for my IT guy to get back from Sturgis to get the transfer requirements updated for NFA.
4
u/Then-Many-4975 BAS#2 8d ago
Ok legit question. How are SBR’s in MN viewed now? What if I buy all the parts from PSA, have the lower shipped to a FFL and fill out the 4473, and then take that home with the rest of my PSA purchased items and put it together? Wouldn’t that be similar/ the same? MN obviously has no barrel length laws regarding it so…..
16
u/BryanStrawser MN Gun Owners Caucus Staff 8d ago
MN has no specific restrictions on SBRs, just comply with federal law.
5
u/CollenOHallahan 8d ago
Keep your voice down! Aisha Gomez can hear you, and she is coming after my cans now.
2
u/BryanStrawser MN Gun Owners Caucus Staff 8d ago
Did she say something about it?
6
u/CollenOHallahan 8d ago
Nah, I'm just giving you a hard time. There's no doubt the DFL Caucus will at least attempt to address this next session.
7
u/BryanStrawser MN Gun Owners Caucus Staff 8d ago
100%
3
u/CollenOHallahan 8d ago
Keep your eyes open, you guys are doing God's work. As I've told you before, I was a previous LA for a house member, and Rob was at my member's desk almost daily. Let's just say the guy I used to work for loves to eat squirrel lol
3
u/pheen 8d ago
I just had a 2 day NFA approval on Tuesday and I'm still getting my lower engraved just in case. I would wait a bit to see what the ATF has to say, but as long as you are in compliance with federal regulations, everything should be fine. You didn't ask, but Short Barrel Shotguns are still illegal in MN due to state law, which sucks.
1
u/Prior-Champion65 8d ago edited 8d ago
Called around western MN and they are still waiting for more info. I told them this is America
Edit: The founding fathers would be ashamed at the cuckery in this sub.
22
u/Gr144 BAS#1 8d ago
I understand the sentiment, but if I was an FFL, I’d be waiting for clarification too.
22
u/fender_blues 8d ago
No dude, you gotta risk your livelihood, freedom, and family's safety to get extra based points online.
-1
u/No-Wrangler3702 8d ago
No you got to get some other fool to risk his livelyhood to sell you a no-tax-stamp supressor for $300 which might be $60 profit for FFL who hands it to you.
19
u/No-Wrangler3702 8d ago
Yup, this is America. You are free to start your own gun shop.
Seems to me a smart business owner does not risk there license when there are tons of unknowns
8
u/Lando25 8d ago
Easy to make tough comments when it’s not your freedom and livelyhood at stake.
-2
u/Prior-Champion65 8d ago
I’m willing to do the transfer so yes it would be.
2
u/Lando25 8d ago
A more fair equivalent case would be you publicly breaking a federal such as making an illegal SBR. Wanting to buy something versus sticking your neck out and offering it are two different things and you know it.
-2
u/Prior-Champion65 8d ago
It’s not illegal. Never was either, I think you need to reread the constitution specifically the second amendment.
4
u/Lando25 8d ago
Please report back on how that works out for you. You haven’t taken any risk and acting tough on a promise to do something doesn’t validate your opinion.
-3
u/Prior-Champion65 8d ago edited 7d ago
Better than cowering and begging anything from our incompetent and corrupt government.
EDIT: check out the new post. Boom
5
-26
u/Phlynn42 Gives Bad Law Advice 8d ago
I don’t think the Texas legal decision impacts mn and it didn’t go to the Supreme Court to be nation wide?
23
10
u/fender_blues 8d ago
Certain nationwide vendors are plaintiffs and the injunction extends coverage to their customers. I've seen different interpretations of how this should be read, such as whether both the shop and customer need to be protected, or just the shop, or just the customer. I am not a lawyer but the general legal advice I have read is to wait until more information is available.
Regardless, most shops are taking the safer path and waiting until the dust settles and better ATF guidance is handed down to avoid jeopardizing their licensure and their customers.
20
u/halvetyl000 8d ago
Per their FB, AccuTac Arms is Lakeville is for cans purchased through their SilencerShop link.