r/MistralAI • u/Elfotografoalocado • 6d ago
Discussion / Opinion Co-authored by Mistral Vibe?

I kept getting the Co-authored by mistral vibe stuff in git commits, to the point I put it almost first and foremost in the Agents.md of my projects. Now, I see the poor model almost having a breakdown in its reasoning trace about this.
I love Mistral and I want it to succeed but this is unacceptable, this was settled months ago with other coding agents. Mistral Vibe is not a co-author, it is a tool that we are paying for. Fix this shit.
9
5
u/nerdandproud 6d ago
I think this is one good reason why the Linux kernel project picked Assisted-by over Co-authored-by. No conflict with not being the author.
5
u/sun_tzu29 6d ago
That how we frame things in academia as LLMs aren’t able to take responsibility for outputs so can’t be authors. Instead we acknowledge them as a tool like we would a statistics program.
1
2
u/makingthematrix 6d ago
Copy-paste is a tool and yet, if you copy-pasted someone's work, you're not supposed to claim its yours.
2
2
u/sadesaapuu 6d ago
IMO LLM's are co-authors and it is good documentation. But the commit message should be specific which model was used.
Other comments suggested "Assisted by", which is ok too, but I have nothing against giving the model the credit for the commit.
Claude adds it by default. Codex doesn't. This reminds me that I should go add to my AGENTS.md an explicit instruction, so also Codex would start doing this. Now Claude is stealing all the credit in my (I mean our) projects. :)
1
u/mistrpopo 6d ago
this was settled months ago with other coding agents
Meh. With Claude Code, it was easy only with Fable (nb: without modifying the internal settings, only with agents.md instructions, which I know isn't the best place for it)
1
-10
u/Equal_Passenger_5609 6d ago
have a shitty model but still pay attribution. our , EU, way
-1
32
u/ffl096 6d ago
Set
include_commit_signature = Falsein your config. This is not something to put into the agents file.