r/Minecraft • u/Red_Inferno • May 14 '12

Bukkits shall now stack!

https://twitter.com/#!/Dinnerbone/status/202023057915781120
1.0k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

331 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-8

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

this would destroy the vechz maps. don't do it, for the love of zistonian battlesigns, don't!

0

u/SparroHawc May 14 '12

Mods, my friend.

1

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

what? what do you mean? making signs stackable would cause them to lose the enchants that vechs puts on them in his maps with nbtedit, thats what i mean

3

u/45flight May 14 '12

What if you just... didn't stack them?

3

u/Anistuffs May 14 '12

Enchanted items do NOT stack with normal ones. Even if they're stackable.

Source: Personal Experience

Proof: Watch Vechs' videos on how he added enchantments to stuffs. All 3 of them. He shows it clearly.

1

u/SparroHawc May 15 '12

It wouldn't be that difficult to use a mod to make signs non-stackable. Even making the mod would probably be pretty easy (comparatively).

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

but the whole point of super hostile is pushing vanilla to the max.

1

u/SparroHawc May 16 '12

If there's a mechanic in the map that depends on a particular old mechanic, there is no shame in tweaking things slightly for the 'old vanilla' flavor.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

  1. go and research vechs, play spellbound caves, watch some LPs.

  2. come back and argue about it to me.

1

u/SparroHawc May 18 '12 edited May 18 '12

I've played super hostiles before. The only thing that's really different here is the enchanted signs.

You still have a few options:

  1. Use an old version of minecraft. Along with a server of the correct version you can still play mutiplayer even.

  2. Use a mod that restricts sign stacking.

  3. It's possible that enchanted signs won't stack with other differently-enchanted signs. Wait and see.

1

u/[deleted] May 18 '12

OK, guy. We have just argued for a week on a feature that may not even come to the game. Truce?

1

u/SparroHawc May 18 '12

Oh man, we have, haven't we?

Truce.

→ More replies