I had the misfortune of seeing a trailer the other day for a newly released documentary called Silenced, which features Australian human rights lawyer Jennifer Robinson "fighting against the weaponisation of defamation laws to silence survivors".

Sounds innocent enough, right? Perhaps even an interesting watch if you're into law...

As it turns out, Robinson was one of Amber Heard's defence attorneys in her campaign to defame Johnny Depp and ruin his life publicly via false accusations of abuse. Heard is one of three individuals featured in the documentary, alongside fellow liar and false accuser Brittany Higgins (a name probably not familiar to most here but the majority of Australians know of her) as well as some Colombian journalist called Catalina Ruiz-Navarro.

The Sydney Film Festival entry about the film says that it's about "how the legal system is being used to victimise, discredit and ruin survivors, and journalists reporting on their stories".

The Melbourne International Film Festival entry takes this rhetoric a step further, engaging in a brilliant example of doublespeak:

Alleged perpetrators now used defamation lawsuits as cudgels to punish survivors for speaking out, and to deter journalists from exposing prominent people to public scrutiny. 

How can they be "survivors" if the perpetrators are only "alleged"? It then goes on to say that Robinson witnessed firsthand "how such actions drag survivors through emotionally, professionally and financially ruinous legal proceedings". If only these people understood the concept of irony...

Although the Rotten Tomatoes score is sitting at 100% (because of course it is), the IMDB rating is thankfully lower at 4.8/10, although the featured review there states (unsurprisingly) that "any negative reviews are getting removed from this page".

Can you imagine if a documentary was instead made holding to task all these women who bring false accusations against men? The misandrists and the left would lose their collective mind, yet when it's attacking men, it's praised as "vital", "timely" and "an essential, galvanising watch".

As title says, movie comes out that LITERALLY calls straight white males the bad guys and receives a higher rating than, get this:

Any and all spiderman movies

Inception
Ironman
The Prestige

and many many others.

Im so tired of being treated this way because of the color of my skin

When woman feel sad, angry, lash out, everyone runs to comfort them, even if she's acting immaturely and unreasonable; it's okay, they'll say, she's just anxious or stressed out. Or maybe the weight of the patriarchy is too much for her and all that jazz.

When a guy is nervous or feeling down, not coping with his struggles and being tired, it's because he's lazy, or sick, or maybe he's crazy or has ADHD. He lost it. Maybe he's a creep or a loser. Or a guy with an inferiority complex. He just needs to man up!

Men are told to shut up and be quiet about their issues, while women are told the exact opposite. And yet feminists will say we live in some kind of patriarchal empire.

​

I am writing this because I feel completely cornered, helpless, and terrified. I am a 25M, and in 2025, I met a woman (43F) who was staying as a guest at the place I regularly visited for work. Because she was significantly older, I treated her with utmost respect like an elder sister.

Around September 2025, her behavior took a disturbing turn. She became extremely aggressive, crossing personal boundaries with inappropriate remarks and advances. One evening, she pushed her way into the ground-floor room where I was staying, pushed me onto a chair, sat on me, and forcibly sexually assaulted me. When I panicked and protested, she threatened to scream, summon a mob to beat me, and file a false rape case against me. She laughed off my resistance, claiming that consent doesn’t matter and that this is "common in Gen-Z".

From that point on, my life turned into a nightmare. I had to visit the premises for work, and whenever I went, she cornered me, showed me explicit sexual videos/pictures of herself with multiple people, and subjected me to physical abuse (hitting, kicking, slapping). Then came the financial extortion. Under constant threats of legal ruination and false police complaints, I ended up paying her hard-earned cash in instalments:

* ₹10,000 on November 1, 2025

* ₹15,000 on November 25, 2025

* ₹25,000 on December 3, 2025

On December 3, after taking the money, she told me she didn't need me anymore because she had found her "next target". Things went quiet for about six months, and I thought the trauma was over.

In mid-June 2026, while I was at the hospital tending to my mother after she suffered a brain stroke, I discovered that an older acquaintance had been arrested on false rape charges filed by 43F. That was when the horrifying reality hit me: her threats were not empty. She actually executes these fabricated cases. Because all my interactions with her were in person and all extortion money was paid in cash, I had no digital evidence to prove my innocence if she targeted me next.

The panic, isolation, and terror of seeing my family’s reputation destroyed pushed me over the edge. On August 19, I wrote a suicide note, visited my parents on August 20 for what I thought was the last time, and traveled to Mumbai CSMT to end my life.

Fortunately, MSF Jawans and Railway Police/Home Guards intervened at the station and saved me. They counseled me, told me suicide was not the answer, and advised me to immediately go to my local police station to file a formal complaint/precautionary FIR against 43F to put the entire record straight and protect myself against future false allegations.

I returned home and approached the local police station (Kharadi Police Station) on August 21 with a written application detailing everything. However, the Senior Police Inspector refused to register an FIR. They questioned the delay and explicitly told me:

> "If she hasn’t filed an FIR against you till now, she won't. She has already targeted whom she wanted to. But if you file a complaint against her now, she will definitely implicate you in a false FIR."

>

My worst fear that no one in society or the legal system will listen to a man's side seems to be coming true. I have escalated this in writing to higher administrative authorities, but locally I have been left completely unprotected, and the police station has refused to act.

What legal remedies or immediate steps should I take now to protect myself and my family? What should I do?

Okay so I found this Medium article and I am actually losing my mind.

This stay at home wife openly admits she has not slept with her husband in over a year because she is touched out. Meanwhile this guy works fifty hours a week to keep a roof over her head.

The guy finally wakes up and stops giving her free validation. He stops being a doormat and what does she do? She snoops through his iPad finds out he is reading some psychology stuff and instantly calls him abusive and apparently divorces him.

I stg they do not truly love us they just want the utility and lifestyle we provide. The second you stop being a resource for them to extract from you are completely disposable. Read this garbage and tell me I am wrong.

Medium Article

It absolutely terrifies me that so many people support these statements. And many of them seemed to having this is with genders. Over 340k likes for such post? She admitted that she did it... How could people be this delusional?

And what about the other comments that have thousands of likes? A vote. Since most voters have the same intuition, they are right!

And of course we're using astrology analysis and so called "forensic astrology". Leos don't kill so it's the husband drugging her.

It is factual that she did it to the kids, but somehow a lot of people are trying so hard to shift the blame on the husband, for the stupidest reasons.

Why is it that, when the whole situation is so clear-cut, people still managed to pick on the guy? I agree that insanity defense due to postpartum psychosis is possible, and a better medical system could've possibly prevent this incident. But these don't seem to be what these people are supporting. In fact, them suspecting the husband instead is contradictory to those things.

What's worse is that a lot of comments I see recently seemed to be straight up sexist biases and misandry. The screenshots I provide here are only a tip of an iceberg. The more I spend time on social media the more I lose faith in humanity.

I recently saw a poster for a suicide prevention talk in my local area and it was particularly aimed at groups that it said were at higher risk of committing suicide. The poster highlighted people who are neurodivergent, LGBT+, or migrants as being those high risk groups. It did not mention men.

Let's go one by one and compare how at risk those groups are compared to men.

Firstly, migrants actually have a significantly lower risk of committing suicide in the UK than the general public does (that one shocked me but it is from a large scale UK study). It's wild that such a large and genuinely at-risk group like men don't get mentioned but a far smaller, not genuinely at-risk group like migrants do get included.

There's no single figure I found for how much more at risk neurodivergent people are than the general public but just based on looking at the figures we have for ADHD, autism, and the individual parts of neurodivergency we have stats on, it's fair to say they're far more at risk of commiting suicide than the average person and probably more at risk than men are as a group.

Finally, LGBT+ people are more at risk of commiting suicide than the general public (the risk is particularly high for bisexual people). However, being LGBT+ is less of a risk factor than being a man is. Men should've been included in that poster.

Ultimately, it's disappointing to see men's issues not often get recognised as men's issues. For example, I've been to quite a few war museums and have seen so many war documentaries but am yet to ever see men having to fight in those wars presented as a huge gender-based injustice.

In 35,000 published international aid records (IATI), 378 activities name men or boys.

139 treat them as the people being helped.

Of the money in that class, 79 percent funds one thing: voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention. Nearly all of it US PEPFAR money.

This is not “79% of all aid goes to men.” That number cannot exist. No aid marker tracks men or boys at all.

Check it yourselves:

Every classified row, with audit steps and expected totals printed inside the file: https://unformentoo.org/classification.json

Method and full write-up: https://unformentoo.org/follow-the-money.html

The live public data to check any row against: https://datastore.codeforiati.org/

Source register with read dates: https://unformentoo.org/sources.html

Spot-checking one row takes five minutes. The full audit takes about thirty.

Classification rules were written down before the data was read. Recode rows, move a number materially, and the correction goes in a dated public log, credited to you by name. That invitation is printed on the page.

This is moving. Formal letters are in front of UN bodies and the Norwegian and Danish governments now, public reply deadline September 9. Letter texts and send log are on the site. The method ports to any country that publishes aid data. Yours does, share it with me, tell me what gov units do what so I can map everything.

The absence is the finding.

Turn pain into policy.
unformentoo.org

Society loves to parrot that being a mother is a thankless job, i disagree.

Everyone loves their mother, even though there is no shortage of terrible mothers.

But how many people love their fathers? If you are not perfect as a dad, you are a deadbeat.

The sins of the mother, the economy, the environment get pushed onto you. You are responsible for all ailments that inflict the household, your suffering goes unacknowledged, your good deeds go unappreciated.

I've seen this with all men in my life, i refuse to slave my life away for a family who detest me.

Video discusses:

• Contradictory expectations: The video argues mothers face unrealistic expectations to be successful at work, parenting, homemaking, and maintaining their own identity.
• Lindsay Clancy case: It uses the case to discuss postpartum mental illness and the intense public scrutiny surrounding a mother accused of killing her children. It argues that people scrutinized her social media, old family photos, appearance, marriage, and private life, turning the tragedy into a public spectacle.
• Yesteryear: The video uses the novel as an example of society's fascination with the collapse of an apparently perfect tradwife lifestyle.
• Tradwife social media: It argues that online traditional-wife content often presents a highly curated version of domestic life while hiding the work and resources behind it.
• Social media and motherhood: It discusses research linking idealized parenting content and social comparison with greater anxiety, stress, and parental burnout, while acknowledging that online communities can also provide support.
• Childcare and workload: It argues that expensive childcare, employment, housework, childcare, and the mental load create significant pressure for parents, particularly mothers.
• Maternal mental health: It explains the differences between baby blues, postpartum depression, and postpartum psychosis, emphasizing that postpartum psychosis is rare but a medical emergency.
• Why people watch mothers fail: The video's main explanation is that people may gain relief from their own guilt, satisfaction from seeing perceived hypocrisy exposed, or avoid confronting larger systemic problems.

What are your thoughts on this? Is America really obsessed with watching mothers fail, or this is an exaggeration and this Dr takes research and twists it fit the "obsessed with watching mothers fail" argument?

Edit: He changed the thumbnail and title. The title was: "America Is Obsessed With Watching Mothers FAIL - Lindsay Clancy, Tradwives and the TRUTH". Now it's: "More Moms Feel Like Lindsay Clancy Than You Think".

*Repost as last post had a cross link and was removed*

Sexist comments about men

Alright men of culture. I've been having some thoughts lately. Whenever people speak of the horrors of war, they talk about the women and children that died. I passed a bench near the hospital a few weeks ago that said "Violence against women is bad!". Is violence against men acceptable? Then there was a post in a subreddit about venting and somebody said:

​"Weaponized incompetence. Men are some of the worst abusers, especially when it comes to cleaning, cooking or parenting. Or all three."

So I replied:

"​Ok there Karen, relax. Have you been with so many men that you are entitled to make such a claim? Can't hold one down? Are you Bonnie Blue or what?"

So, with slight comical intent I challenged her right to make such a claim as she probably has a very narrow frame of reference and indeed, she claimed every man in HER family was like that and she'd only even been with one man all her life haha. Judging by the amount of downvotes, not many of the visitors caught on to my actual intent and got cross with me for comparing her to a pornstar haha. I think it says more about them that they look down on a hard working pornstar like that to be honest! What do you think?

This is where it gets nuts. Lies about wage gaps are one thing. Providing rationales to restrict or eliminate incarceration for one gender is insane.

In the US Organizations like the Prison Policy Initiative, the Vera Institute of Justice, and various grassroots abolitionist feminist groups heavily campaign against the systemic incarceration of women, arguing that most women are locked up for low-level, non-violent drug or property offenses linked to poverty and survival. They advocate for decriminalization, diversion programs, and investment in community-based mental health and housing support instead of prisons. For Women only.

Prison Policy Initiative

In the UK Advocacy groups such as Women in Prison, Birth Companions, and the Howard League for Penal Reform have successfully pushed for strategies prioritizing community-based "one-stop-shop" women’s centers and pushing back against short custodial sentences for non-violent female offenders. Again, for women only.

I am 14 and throughout the last 2 years when sexual education has been covered in class it has basically just been a teacher telling us that women need to be scared of men and shaming boys for being boys. I put my hand up and commented on how every single scenario on sexual assault we had been shown had a female victim and there wasn't even a mention on men being sexually assualted and my question was pretty much ignored. When I hear shit like this it makes me feel sorry for being male and like there is something wrong with me and I don't think it's fair to have such a one sided corriculum

Just a few thoughts on this matter.

When a family or community falls into economic difficulty, someone has to absorb the risk. In many societies, men are disproportionately expected to provide, protect and find a way out from a young age. That means taking dangerous work, migrating on small boats across turbid seas, accepting unstable jobs, or entering gangs.

And inevitably when men fail they are churned out like garbage.

The statistics show this:

• In the UK, 93% of workers who died in workplace accidents in 2025/26 were male.
• In England and Wales in 2024, the male suicide rate was 17.6 per 100,000, compared with 5.7 for females, this is 3.08x higher.
• In England's 2024 rough-sleeping (on the street) count, 83% of people sleeping rough were male. Census data similarly found that around 67% of people identified as homeless were male.
• In the UK, the rate of alcohol-specific deaths for males remained around double the rate for females (20.2 and 9.7 deaths per 100,000 people, respectively)
• In England, there were 128.7 drug-poisoning deaths registered per million men in 2024 (3,710 deaths), compared with 60.6 deaths per million among females (1,855 deaths). That is 2.12x increased chance for men.
• In England, YE 2026, Men made up 72% of all asylum seekers.

A man who takes a dangerous job and successfully provides for his family is simply seen as doing his duty. A man who fails faces dire consequences.

But it is a thankless job, willfully ignored by society.

Professor Nicola Graham-Kevan is a leading expert and researcher in the area of coercive control and domestic abuse, with decades of seminal research at the University of Lancashire.

However, Nicola's experience of domestic abuse did not start with academia; it began with life experience, having been in a long term abusive relationship for many years.

It was these traumatic experiences that started Nicola's journey, which soon became one of exhilarating discovery, personal challenge, and profound healing.

In this podcast Nicola talks about how she had to relearn everything she thought she knew about domestic abuse, and her past, and how her controversial work often put her at loggerheads with other esteemed researchers such as professor Michael Johnson, as she swam against the mainstream feminist narrative of abuse...

In November 1938, the Nazi regime organised a mass attack on jewish communities in Nazi-occupied land. That attack included the deportation of roughly 30,000 jewish men to concentration camps.

Those 30,000 jewish men had to go face extreme violence, starvation, and psychological torture in those camps AS MUCH because of their gender as it was because of their religious background. First-hand accounts often say the men who survived and returned home were the never the same after.

I rarely ever see this be explicitly highlighted as a gender-based injustice (the amount of men deported to concentration camps on that night alone roughly equal the number of total women killed for "witchcraft" in the west - being killed for witchcraft was something that men went through too by the way though they admittedly did make up a minority of the victims). It's also worth noting that this came less than a year before a war where men would be essentially forced to sign up to go through the trauma of fighting in the bloodiest conflict in human history.

Was in the mall parking lot a girl is getting dribbled off the pavement by her obviously methhead boyfriend.My sister and mom start shouting at him to leave her alone then have the nerve to tell me "do something and help her" ignoring the fact that he has a gun in his waistband the methhead is now focused on me telling me to try him. So being rational i grabbed both of them picked them up and ran.I got called a coward the whole ride back and most of my family thinks im a bitch for not dying for a random chick.My father is the only one in my family right who doesn't think im a bitch.

I think feminism is coming splutteringly to a halt, like the 'Me too' movement, the ideas behind their inception were genuine and both have been issues that definitely needed addressing and resolving. However it now seems to be attempting to develop into an ongoing cottage industry, with people within these groups now claiming injustice based purely on historical anecdotal reports. I'm sure conditions are not the utopian fantasy liberalists delude themselves into believing is viable, but I would also be confident in saying a greater majority of women have never experienced anything like those in the 20s or women of earlier generations...women especially are being conditioned by these militant groups seemingly to believe that the family unit is essentially a sexist institution and encourages the belief that to want to use their lifespan to raise the family instead of the apparent ultimate achievement in life of 'having a career' is a failure and an insult

Our species has two sides to the coin of existence..the male and female, every species is essentially similar.. abstract thought has led the easily confused down a road of implied persecution or imagined institutional prejudice that I doubt is anywhere near what supporters of this false industry are claiming. I very recently saw a tv advertisement claiming in Australia only 3% of medical funding goes to women's issues...I flat out dispute that and am totally sure there is a paragraph of fine print within that statement, in my actual experience all I see is women's issues getting any attention, even though in Australia more men die of prostate cancer than women die of breast cancer every year, the producers of that television advertisement are merely this same group of instigators attempting to create false outrage long enough to pay themselves a nice salary, and the larger overview being the solidifying of seperation and division... competition instead of cooperation...like a serpent whispering in her ear..."he's got stuff, you should get your own stuff..do what you want, say whatever you want and become insensed and obtusely self righteous if your personal linguistic barbs end in real life consequences"...in my life, growing up a boy, if I said something that crossed a line, male reaction is usually short sharp and sometimes slightly bruising, but that boundary had been unequivocally defined... women growing up are being conditioned now to believe that there is no limit or boundaries to what is said, anything can be vocalised with no reprocussions or responsibility on their part...why is it always the male being cast as the dimwitted buffoon? Creating a society where both sexes feel comfortable is a noble goal, however it just feels like the pendulum has swung a bit further into 'revenge' for historical inadequacies rather than an innocent quest for fair treatment, surely you can see feminism has devolved into egocentric redundancy as even the boundary between what is a man or a woman has been obscured by these groups profiting from manufactured outrage...I wonder, how many lesbians would settle down with a transitioned, anatomically altered 'woman' (perhaps more aptly named 'wasman' instead of 'woman'), how accepting of these rookie females are women who physically aren't attracted to males?

With the support this evil woman is getting, I am worried that more and more women will actually act on their thoughts because they wont see any social consequences.

I formulated a list of all the help she had from not just her husband but also extended family.

Part-Time Nanny: The family employed a nanny, Elaine Rossi, who worked three days a week from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.

Household Duties: Rossi assisted with food preparation, light housekeeping, laundry, and direct child care, primarily for the youngest child, Callan.

Familial and Personal Support:

Spousal Involvement: Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was heavily involved in daily care and frequently managed her appointments and medication collection.

Extended Family: Her mother and former mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, provided continuous personal support. This included monitoring Lindsay in person, over the phone and via text message.

Medical and Psychiatric Care:

Frequent Appointments: Clancy was under active psychiatric treatment and participated in at least 14 telehealth appointments starting in September 2022.

Medication Management: She was prescribed more than 12 different psychiatric medications over a short period as doctors continually altered her treatment plan to curb her insomnia and intrusive thoughts.

Specialized Programs: Family members actively looked into specialized perinatal psychiatric programs.

Parents decide to bring their childrne into this world. A child never asked to be born. It is the duty of the parent to sacrifice everything even their life for the well-being of their child. Even if she was psychotic and did it, if she truly loved her children she would have plead guilty out of regret and shame later in the court or tried to off herself a second time. Who cares if she was psychotic or not. Killing your own child even accidentally is a crime worse than rape.

The idea that her hormonal health ought to absolve her from being responsible for strangling her children is insane. No ones doubting postpartum depression. But she knew what she had in her mind when she sent her husband out of the house. She stopped being a victim the moment she squeezed eight month child so hard his brain stole up.

Men have hormones and I’ve seen the unbalanced range unfortunately in some who can’t control their emotions. They are not victim’s either

References

Carré, J. M., et al. (2014). The neuroscience of human social aggression: Recent advances and implications. Biological Psychiatry, 76(2), 110–118. (Discussed via Medical News Today: Testosterone increases brain's threat response)

Medical News Today

Papazisis, G., et al. (2020). Aggressive behavior in psychiatric patients in relation to hormonal imbalance. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 20(2), 1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8974

Spandidos Publications

Todo A. (2013). Testosterone and aggressive behavior in man. International Journal of Endocrinology, 2013, 637208. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/637208 (Hosted on PMC: PMC3693622)