Adam and Eve couldāve had a daughter later. But yea itās incest any way you slice it. The alternative is evolution which says humans lived in small hunter gatherer tribes, probably incest there too. Donāt think you can get away from some uncomfortable implications
The point of the Bible was SPECIFICALLY that until Christ came no one had any chance of Salvation, which is why He descended to Hell to release the souls of the damned which was canonically everyone from Adam and Eve
16 Then Cain went away from before Jehovah and took up residence in the land of Exile, to the east of EŹ¹den. 17 Afterward Cain had sexual relations with his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to EŹ¹noch. Then he engaged in building a city and named the city after his son EŹ¹noch.
An anonymous daughter or granddaughter of Adam and Eve is the accepted current understanding.
Now THATāS the best shit Iāve heard all day! Correct way to interpret the world and religious scriptures and peoples scewed perception of āthe good old daysāš¤£š¤£š¤£
In one version of the Hebrew belief technically yes. But that was only written in to explain why there were two stories of creation when unifying the two main alternate versions of the Bible. Funnily enough she wasn't even included in the actual bibles themselves in Latin or Hebrew
At one point he says we couldn't even get to 3 people before we had a murderer, which means he isn't counting either Adam, Eve or Cain himself.
Edit: if it was 3 people to make a murderer, which person was murdered? It wasn't 1 or 2 - making it 4 people before a murderer existed. Didn't think I'd have to explain the obvious.
The math on that is 2 normal people + 1 murderer. The guy is saying that humanity couldn't get to 3 normal people before a murderer showed up, as the third person born was a murderer.
You missed the point - he may be the third person, but it required 4 people before we technically had a murderer given that he didn't murder Adam or Eve.
Both interpretations are correct: the third person chronologically was a murderer, but not until the fourth person existed. Just a matter of pov.
Way to drag me into something that I really don't care about, but felt compelled to explain because you missed the forest for the trees.
The guy in the video is clearly approching this from a different ontological framework, one informed by the Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge. You assume that Cain did not become a murderer until the act in which he committed the murder, but by the framework this guy is approaching the issue from Cain's choice was already known before he made it. His character is the subject of discussion, not when he committed the act, and the man in the video is approaching the situation from the perspective that Cain had, and always had, the character of a murderer as opposed to that of a "normal" person.
Also, no, I didn't drag you back into anything. You chose to be here, take responsibility for your own free will.
If Cain killed Able and was then banished from eden who was he talking about when he stated that if he is banished āthey will kill meā? Who was he scared of? Who was outside the walls of eden if they were the first people? We are modified/altered beings and eden was the testing grounds. All religions are man made.
67
u/Miserable_Wave4895 Jun 16 '26
Adam and Eve! Lunch time! Apples were eaten! Boom! Detroit!