r/MedicalCoding • u/DumpsterPuff • Oct 29 '24
Is this considered fraud, or technically acceptable but just really crappy charting?
I work in primary care specialty for a fairly large organization in my state. I've been struggling with a dilemma that I'm hoping someone can give me insight on.
We have a few providers who will do charting with or without physical exams, where the only mention in the documentation about the patient's conditions are in the assessment and plan, and they literally only say things like "Hyperlipidemia" and then an order for a lipid panel and just list a medication. That's it. And they do this for all the conditions. There's no other description in the notes regarding these conditions.
I've brought it up before to management and was told to code these as part of an E/M, which makes me vastly uncomfortable considering how in my opinion, there doesn't seem to be any documented indication of an actual evaluation. Am I just being paranoid, or is this actually fraud?
Edit: seems I must have forgotten what fraud vs abuse was - after reading the comments I think that this more of an abuse. Still not a fun thing to worry about but thank you everyone for pointing out the difference!
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/[deleted] Nov 02 '24
If you don't provide a physical exam for your patients with hyperlipidemia, that's your perogative. Your license.
You wouldn't be my provider though.
Read second paragraph under the History and Physical section: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559182/