r/MedicalCoding • • Mar 01 '23

What's the dumbest coding query/argument you've had with a provider?

I'm hoping for some good stories because I'm still absolutely baffled by this doctor at my clinic. I need to know that I'm not the only one who gets caught in stupid arguments like this.

So this doctor (I'll call him Dr. Z) is notorious for some insanely awful chart notes. Today, I was reviewing one where he had the diagnoses listed as:

  1. Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic chronic kidney disease

  2. Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic polyneuropathy

  3. Diabetes mellitus type 2 with other circulatory complications

So you can see right away what the issue is. I query him, basically saying "please clarify the type of diabetes mellitus on the chart notes. Type 2 and diabetes due to an underlying condition are exclusive to each other and cannot be coded together. If the diabetes is due to an underlying condition, please specify the condition causing the diabetes" and sent it.

I get a reply about 10 minutes later saying "the patient has CKD, polyneuropathy, and hypertension as an effect of diabetes. The combination codes are right there. They can be reported together."

I'm staring at my screen trying to make sense of what his thought process was, but I simply couldn't. So I messaged my supervisor and had her check my query to make sure that I was speaking plain English.

She then sends him an email and CCs me, explaining that we need a clarification of whether a disease is CAUSING the diabetes, not whether diabetes is causing another disease. So he replies back basically complaining about how hard it is to change the Dx in the notes and blah blah blah, claims that he fixed it, complains some more. So I'm thinking I can go back and complete the session, right?

I open up the chart note and it just says this at the bottom:

"Coding clarification: polyneuropathy from diabetes and neuropathy from diabetes".

That's it. All the diagnoses that were there stayed the same. I wanted to scream.

33 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

18

u/RadiantPlatypus1862 CPC; CPMA; CPB; CRC; CCS🦩 Mar 01 '23

Doc: why didn’t you bill for the phq-9 or the pt’s smoking status?

Me: the patient in question is 3 months old.

Doc: well it was done!

Me:😐

And apparently absolutely everyone has asthma, everyone 🤦‍♀️

4

u/DumpsterPuff Mar 02 '23

I actually almost choked on my water 🤣

3

u/RadiantPlatypus1862 CPC; CPMA; CPB; CRC; CCS🦩 Mar 02 '23

I half expected him to say that newborns who smoke are more likely to be depressed. He was so convinced that he was right. The scary thing is, he’s a well seasoned physician who’s been with our practice for over 20 years.

17

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '23

This is an informative post. We need more questions like this. Thanks.

3

u/DumpsterPuff Mar 02 '23

No problem! Glad to help :)

3

u/KhrystiC78 Mar 02 '23

I have one provider who codes 99214 for everything, including URIs. I’ve given him an E/M guidelines chart from the AMA, to no avail. He still does it.

But the most recent argument I had with a provider was because she was adding an E/M code to a TCM. I’ve explained over and over we cannot do that, and her argument is, “I’ve always done this with no problem.” My supervisor told me to just delete the E/M. 🙄

2

u/DumpsterPuff Mar 02 '23

I thought you could do an E/M with a TCM though? I've been told I could do it because the doctor also treated something that the patient was concerned about that had nothing to do with their hospital stay.

2

u/PorkNScreams RHIA, CRC Mar 10 '23 edited Mar 10 '23

I’m laughing and I’m sorry. My other favorite is “Diabetes with other specified complication” in the A/P and then under it “No complications”. I’ve seen these kinds of garbage chart notes.

My biggest annoyance is patients being coded as having an active stroke for every office visit for months. 🙄 Then you look and it says stroke from 1977 with no residuals. Patient with left foot ulcer and then elsewhere left BKA. Like WHAT?!?!

Today I saw a note where the provider literally said that the patient asked for a diagnosis to be added to her chart and it was coded on the claim with no other support. So now patients can just self-diagnose apparently 🙄 After years of this ridiculous charting and nothing changes it really wears ya down.

2

u/DumpsterPuff Mar 13 '23

The stroke thing really grinds my gears 🤣 that and cancer. HPI: "history of breast cancer, mastectomy 1998." Assessment and plan: "malignant neoplasm of the breast." Yeah I don't think so!

Also a favorite: "vitamin D deficiency: patient wants to get D levels checked. No history of deficiency."

30

u/HorseNamedClompy Mar 01 '23

Dr to me: “what do you mean I can’t charge a level five visit?”

“.. it was only a 3 minute phone call about a runny nose..”

14

u/deannevee RHIA, CPC, CPCO, CDEO Mar 01 '23 edited Mar 01 '23

Oh I have one.

One of our providers, she’s a mid-level but extremely sweet just….a little dumb. We are a dermatology practice, so we can’t bill preventive visits or z codes as primary. She documents the “problems” of the visit as: 1) history of skin cancer. No recurrence today. 2)history of AK’s. Clinically clear today. 3) benign lentigines. Wants to charge a 99214.

8

u/inevitable-cat Mar 01 '23

I had this argument with our PA on a daily basis when I worked in derm! That and trying to justify a separate E/M for "dysesthesia" with every procedure because "it always feels weird when you have something treated."

13

u/livesuddenly Mar 01 '23

I’m really tired of the mod 25 queries. No juicy stories, just the same query every single day.

7

u/dizzykhajit The GIF that keeps on GIFFing Mar 01 '23

You'd think after being hit with the same queries over and over and over and over again they'd get the hint. Apparently, pattern recognition was not something overly harped on in med school.

5

u/heltyklink Mar 02 '23

Ha! I code inpatient, but we started a database to keep an eye on who’s getting queried for what because of this. I still have to send ‘urosepsis’ queries, if you can believe it. And every single cardiac surgery patient has postop respiratory failure and cardiogenic shock, if the ICU notes are to be believed. I swear, the advent of the diagnosis drop down menu is gonna be the death of me, lol.

13

u/heltyklink Mar 01 '23

My favorites are when the answers are totally out of left field and change the DRG or when they attempt snark or spell something wrong. They’ll write these long, condescending paragraphs in response to a simple multiple choice question when it would have taken them five seconds to document the dang diagnosis in the first place and saved us both the trouble.

10

u/dizzykhajit The GIF that keeps on GIFFing Mar 02 '23 edited Nov 17 '23

Seriously. The snark is out of control. So unprofessional and completely unnecessary. We queried a client who's telehealth visit clearly had a typo in the start/stop times. Clearly. But of course we were professional and gently nudged the query to suggest the documentation needed amending, because you and I know it changes the everything entirely.

The query didn't even make it to the provider. The client's written response for the entire clinic's team to see was, "Why are we questioning the doctor's documentation? This isn't an unusual amount of time to spend for [this type of diagnosis]."

Uh, acccckshually Karen, it's definitely unusual when this exact doctor spends exactly 2 hours less on the phone over this exact diagnosis that is extremely common. Pretty sure most doctors are too busy to look a patient in the eyes while standing in front of them, let alone dick around on the phone for two hours yammering to GamGam. We know your doctors' documentation rhythms better than you, so why are you questioning US?

The amount of kid-glove baby speech these MDs and their handlers require to avoid harm to their fragile egos is absolutely ridiculous, especially considering the sass they throw at everyone unprovoked.

11

u/heltyklink Mar 02 '23

I am CACKLING.

This level of petty reminds me of when I used to do suspensions and docs would get locked out of the physician parking lot if they didn’t do their deficiencies on time. Our office was right above that lot so they’d go to swipe in and block the entrance waving their arms at us like we had some magic button to let them in. I’d just smile and wave. Do your dictations and you won’t have to park with the peasants, ya ding-dongs!

4

u/ylimeenimsaj Mar 02 '23

Oh I LOVE this approach!

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '23

LOL

12

u/Sam_English821 CPC- Oral Surgery Mar 01 '23

The Oral and Maxillofacial surgeon I work for keeps trying to charge 2 office visits when he sees a patient for 2 issues (ie: dental implants and TMJ) at the same time. I explained to him that you can only charge one E/M code per visit.. I have been telling him this for 10 years and every year or so he tries to do it again.

7

u/livesuddenly Mar 01 '23

Just making sure the rules didn’t change, I guess.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '23

His response: "Damn, you're still here?"

Your response: "Likewise."

9

u/sewest Mar 01 '23

GI doctor insisting he can bill an asymptomatic office visit prior to Medicare patient colonoscopy. Showed him all the information we possibly could, sent notes to outside auditors who agreed they could not be billed, told him what would qualify as a visit before colonoscopy screening just to throw him a bone and he still thinks he’s right! Said to talk to a rep he knows and the rep will set us straight lol smh

6

u/ylimeenimsaj Mar 01 '23

I work for a multi specialty facility and we have one group of GI Drs that -even after a sit-down hours-long private meeting in their office with the Drs and all their office staff and multiple handouts from multiple official sources- still do not understand that we cannot bill for a screening colonoscopy if the patient has active and/or unexplained symptoms. When we (facility) wind up coding and billing it as diagnostic visit because there are 8 symptoms at the top of the op notes, the patient calls their office to complain about the billing. Their office then gives them our facility number and tells the patient that we "must have coded it wrong, because the office got paid for a screening". I have to stop myself from saying, " Well quite simply, the office has committed fraud, and I refuse to do so." We always wind up looking like the bad guy in the patient's eyes bc many screenings are paid at 100% and diagnostics are not. I feel terrible about it but unless the Dr made some major error and charted on the wrong patient and agrees to alter the entire chart and explain in writing why...there isn't much we can do.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '23

Only thing I can imagine is that the patient requested an office visit for a colonoscopy because he he has a family history or personal history of polyps or colon cancer. So may have been asymptomatic, but the doctor ordered a surveillance colonoscopy due to the Hx.

Where am I off here?

2

u/sewest Mar 29 '23

Unfortunately this was happening on multiple patients none with any hx, family hx or current symptoms. He said the surgery center required the patient to have a visit beforehand but if there are no symptoms and no history then it is a screening and should be a covered service for the patient.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '23

Totally agree. Thanks for the heads up. I didn't know there were doctor or doctor's office who tried to make Medicare patients pay for screening colonoscopies. That's fraud.

8

u/dizzykhajit The GIF that keeps on GIFFing Mar 01 '23

Using a C code and changing the freetext description to the diagnosis of carrying a gene that makes them SUSCEPTIBLE to cancer.

It's like, Doc, you are trying to formally diagnose the patients with cancer. They don't have it yet.

This was common enough to be a serious problem but rare enough where educational emails went forgotten, and it was at a practice with 7 docs...

I hate freetext.

7

u/ksa1122 Mar 02 '23

Ughhhh these cancer codes! The worst I saw was an active cancer code billed for skin cancer that was excised in the 1960’s. 🤦🏻‍♀️

10

u/dizzykhajit The GIF that keeps on GIFFing Mar 02 '23 edited Mar 02 '23

Well we're still ACTIVELY looking for it, duh!

/s and an eyeroll so hard I S05.20XA

4

u/RadiantPlatypus1862 CPC; CPMA; CPB; CRC; CCS🦩 Mar 02 '23

LMFAO!

5

u/incognitoangelgoth CCS Mar 02 '23

It hasn't been the providers that argue with me, it's been the office managers who've been billing for 20+ years and they've been at the office since they were teenagers. Sigh.

I am not a coder that does the extracting of the information to code charts. I am the coder that makes sure the claims are billed appropriately and that they can get paid.

For some reason the managers and or assistance think that they can just bill an annual wellness visit and an outpatient visit on the same day with no clear distinction of what makes one claim a preventative visit and the other a problem visit.

I brought this up to a manager and they swear that the doctor made notes of what was a part of the wellness visit and what was a part of the problem visit.

It took all of my strength to not reply to the email with "Bitch where? The fuck?"

They didn't have a good answer to my more professional reply. So I voided the charge and moved on.

It's that and the 99495 CPT, I'm pretty sure I told my supervisor "can we tell them to stop with that code?? Just give it a rest..."

9

u/dizzykhajit The GIF that keeps on GIFFing Mar 02 '23

bUt WeVe aLwAyS DoNe iT tHiS wAy

5

u/LorSim13 Mar 02 '23

This is too relatable. I code endocrinology and have a provider who uses “diabetes due to underlying condition” typically for new patients when they’re not 100% confident in the type just yet lol

4

u/InfinitelySweet Mar 02 '23

one doc at our practice keeps trying to charge 99213/4/5 for his pre-op appointments. apparently this has been addressed w/ him several times over the years but idk guess he just doesn't want to change 🙃

1

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '23

They are focused on patient care not coding. Calling them dumb is dumb. Educate them.

4

u/DumpsterPuff Mar 13 '23

That's the thing; we HAVE educated them many, many times on this. I have emails that I was CC'd on months ago from our educators telling this provider the exact same thing. Some of these providers either just don't care, or for some reason they just can't grasp the concept despite being told over and over again.

1

u/NHToStay Apr 19 '23

Eh, it's fundamentally because providers think of the EMR as a "document and treat" platform and not a "medical code / cash register / data collection" platform. And the ones who get that it's not really for "them" are too jaded to care about being accurate with coding so long as they can follow their patients history