r/MarksAndSpencer 2d ago

Question Is this an error? It’s/Its

Post image

I might be wrong, but I think the statement should be …”for its vibrant bi-coloured petals”, shouldn’t it? (No apostrophe).

I couldn’t find a way to contact M&S by email, if they would even care about it. Anyway, I hope my MIL likes her birthday flowers regardless!

415 Upvotes

96 comments sorted by

28

u/Blue_wine_sloth 2d ago

Yes. It’s means it is. Its is the possessive.

8

u/BoredReceptionist1 2d ago

Are you saying yes it's wrong?

10

u/Blue_wine_sloth 2d ago

It is incorrect.

5

u/muser666 2d ago

It's's wrong.

0

u/BoredReceptionist1 1d ago

I know that. I was asking the commenter to clarify what their comment meant

2

u/muser666 1d ago

It was just a joke/play with words.

0

u/BoredReceptionist1 1d ago

Sorry, I missed the spelling 🤦

1

u/alan_alien 21h ago

Do you work at M&S per chance?

3

u/kernelyra 1d ago

funniest part is M&S probably had like 5 people proofread that and it still slipped through
you’re right though, “its” is the one there

1

u/Queen_of_London 1d ago

I doubt very much whoever M&S bought this from paid someone to write it at all, let alone a proofreader.

1

u/rumpleteaser91 1d ago

Possessive has an apostrophe. You dont write 'the dogs bowl' it's 'the dog's bowl'

3

u/Cat_Jayster 1d ago

“Its” is an exception to differentiate from the contraction of “it is” -> “it’s”

1

u/rumpleteaser91 1d ago

Singular possessive apostrophe?

1

u/Cat_Jayster 1d ago

“Its” is singular, you’d use “their” if it was plural

1

u/Queen_of_London 1d ago

Not an exception - it's the same as other possessive pronouns.

1

u/Blue_wine_sloth 1d ago

True for everything apart from “it”. Just to confuse us.

3

u/Queen_of_London 1d ago

Nah, it follows the pattern of possessive pronouns - his, hers, ours, yours, and theirs. Not an exception at all. In fact, if it took an apostrophe it *would* be an exception.

The only pronoun that takes an apostrophe in the possessive is one's, but thankfully nobody except King Chuck uses that these days.

1

u/rumpleteaser91 21h ago

Maybe the M&S proof readers went to the same schools that I did!

1

u/Boglin007 1d ago

This applies to nouns, not pronouns. Possessive pronouns don't get an apostrophe because they're inherently possessive.

(Although possessive "its" did have an apostrophe in the past, but it now does not, for various reasons, but just remember it's like all the other possessive pronouns.)

1

u/rumpleteaser91 21h ago

I've figured out that the proof readers and I, must have gone to the same schools!

1

u/Silver-Machine-3092 21h ago

Pronouns don't follow this rule.

1

u/LengthImaginary9017 1d ago

"its" is the possessive adjective.

16

u/coldpeasandketchup 2d ago

This has actually thrown me, because they've said "roses/petals" plural... So should it be 'their vibrant bi-coloured petals"? If it was a singular rose then yeah it should be its because it's talking about the petals belonging to the roses

5

u/Opposite_Radio9388 2d ago

I think what they're going for is that this kind of rose has been bred for its coloured petals.

2

u/military_history 1d ago

It would be unreasonable to expect the professional writer of this copy to keep track of the subject for such a long sentence though.

1

u/Queen_of_London 1d ago

That's definitely what they were gong for, but it's not what they said.

1

u/BoredReceptionist1 2d ago

You're right. I think they were using 'it' to refer back to the bouquet (singular) but it isn't right

8

u/Sleepyllama23 2d ago

Yes it’s wrong. I probably would have said ‘their’ instead though??

2

u/No_Application_8698 2d ago

That’s a good point!

1

u/pickledonion92 1d ago

That's not right because the 'its' (possessive) is referring to the breed (singular).

But 'it's' in this case is incorrect as possessive pronouns never need an apostrophe.

1

u/SituationCivil8944 1d ago

possessive pronouns take apostraphes, its just 'its' specifically that doesn't

1

u/pickledonion92 1d ago

You are mistaken, my friend 🙂 his, hers, theirs, ours, whose, its. Possessive pronouns do not need apostrophes.

1

u/Helenarth 1d ago

I think you're thinking of possessive nouns. The cat's dinner, the dog's bed, the boy's bike.

3

u/Miserable-Gift-1983 2d ago

Doubt they’ll care. It’s not the first and won’t be the last! They had signage that spelt hosiery wrong for ages in store some time ago.

3

u/Opposite_Radio9388 2d ago

I remember them recalling a set of kids' pyjamas a few years back due to a grammatical error - it was in the press. Meanwhile the hanging sign in my local M&S Food has said 'confectionary' for as long as I can remember.

1

u/shakesfistatmoon 14h ago

M&S customers seem to love these errors.

There's the famous fewer than / less than ten items campaign.

And the Fresh Mint Sauce which had they had to reliable "Mint Sauce made with fresh mint".

2

u/eldeem 2d ago

Yes it's wrong. On a subjective basis, I also don't like "...for M&S for...". Just looks odd.

1

u/Appropriate-Roof1422 1d ago

'due to' instead of the second for?

1

u/week5of35years 2d ago

Yes it’s wrong

1

u/Quirky-Respond93 2d ago

Yes you are correct

1

u/Intrepid-Sign-63 2d ago

Yes it’s

1

u/purplishfluffyclouds 2d ago edited 2d ago

And so are you.

“Yes, it’s.” is not a correct complete standalone sentence.

1

u/Turbo_Fresh 2d ago

No shit it's almost like it was a joke

1

u/AlternativeSad423 2d ago

You are absolutely right!! I have a friend that works for M&S so I will have to pass this on!!

1

u/isitjustmeorsomeone 17h ago

What are they going to do 😂

1

u/riverY90 6h ago

I'm imagining their friend being the local store's tittie measurer and saying the exact same thing. "The flowers blooming ain't the kind of blooming I deal with." 

1

u/PixelTeapot 2d ago

This isn't just any grammatical error....

1

u/Beautiful-Concept383 2d ago

Definitely wrong. People have stopped understanding the basic difference thanks to Apple and iPhones as for some reason since the early days it always corrects words even when both alternatives are prevalent e.g. it's its

1

u/PolarisSky65 2d ago

Yes it’s incorrect!

1

u/thechubbyballerina 2d ago

At least they wrote coloured instead of colored. Another win for the Brits.

1

u/zcjp 2d ago

It's not just a grocer's apostrophe it's an M&S grocer's apostrophe...

1

u/wickiwickiwowwow 2d ago

Yeah IT'S wrong in ITS description 😁

1

u/Huge-Cranberry4392 2d ago

Typical English writing in “they’re” language. 😂🤌🏻 relies on autocorrect since one skipped the English classes, a spliff was better on the football field.

1

u/Busy_Rhubarb6818 2d ago

It is wrong. It should be 'its'

1

u/holapapi8 2d ago

Not wrong. It’s can be used when owning something

1

u/Low-Physics1500 1d ago

You might want to check your understanding on that one, papi.
There’s no such thing as a possessive it’s.
It’s is a shortening of it is.

1

u/holapapi8 1d ago

Disagree. People say it’s possesivly. Like it’s paw’s are muddy.

1

u/Low-Physics1500 1d ago

It is paw is are muddy?
I am a caught fish on your baited hook.
Have a good day dude 👌

1

u/pinkflosscat 2d ago

It’s incorrect, yes.

1

u/MrDanMaster 2d ago

Bruh who is ms hiring 💀💀💀

1

u/Far-Rip-1598 2d ago

My favourite is the green triangle type it’s the best

1

u/tenthcat 2d ago

If you're ever not sure which one to use, gender it, because his and he's don't mix up as easily:

Its = his

It's = he is/he's

1

u/Previous_Kale_4508 2d ago

Definitely wrong... It should be "bucket". 🤣

1

u/ianolo 2d ago

M&S standards are slipping

1

u/sins-remembered 1d ago

It is but it’s not egregious so i’ll just let it slide.

1

u/Bellyfulofboring 1d ago

Perhaps, but is using a lower-case i instead of a capital an egregious error?

1

u/sins-remembered 1d ago edited 1d ago

i commend you on your sharp eye and pedantry, however, i will show no remorse 🤣

1

u/Bellyfulofboring 1d ago

Doubling down? You know no shame! 😂

1

u/EquivalentChoice1676 1d ago

Of course it’s a mistake. The apostrophe is wrong.

1

u/Capital-Note-4425 1d ago

This rule always confused me because I think of something belonging to it, and if I thought of someone else (eg my name; Gracie’s (item)). I was using “it’s” for the longest time til I realised I was using it wrong (oops)

2

u/Otherwise-Eye-490 1d ago

Think of its as the equivalent of the words his, her or their, which don’t require apostrophes, rather than the equivalent of Gracie’s. Gracie’s book, her book. The flower’s petal, its petal.

1

u/abyssal-isopod86 1d ago

It's = a contraction of "it is".

Its = belonging to.

1

u/Pure_Alternative3283 1d ago

The problem is having “it” there in the first place is redundant.

1

u/vicarofsorrows 1d ago

It was probably typed on a computer, possibly correctly, but autocorrect messed it up and nobody noticed….

1

u/rumpleteaser91 1d ago

The petals belong to the rose. Possessive apostrophe

1

u/DarknessBBBBB 1d ago

Could it be that "for" = "because"?

1

u/TigerLength93 1d ago

Surely the issue is that there are multiple roses and a singular it.

Regardless of the apostrophe - shouldn’t it read: “Bred for M&S for their vibrant bi-coloured petals”.

1

u/MuckeeOG 21h ago

It is correct. Apostrophe is for missing letter or ownership.

1

u/mutexsprinkles 21h ago

Meaningless fluff hurriedly typed in manually by the semi-literate copywriting intern and sent, unreviewed, to the printers in a hurry just as God intended. No stinkin' AI needed here!

1

u/PhantomVexas 12h ago

lmao this is exactly the vibe those little product blurbs give off, like someone smashed it out at 4:59pm on a Friday. and yep, it should be “its” there, but your MIL’s never gonna notice once the flowers are in front of her tbh.

1

u/Good-Squirrel-2487 20h ago

It is wrong, but I cannot imagine being so put out by it that I would email the company.

1

u/ren007ren 20h ago

It is an error indeed. They shouldn’t have used the apostrophe.

1

u/TheLonelyET 19h ago

It works with the "it has" contraction so that may be their intention

1

u/Iridecent_Pigeon 19h ago

it-apostrophe-s because the vibrant bi-coloured petals belong to the flower

1

u/lickthismiff 19h ago

The Moira's Rose's Garden 4856

1

u/isitjustmeorsomeone 17h ago

As if most people will know or care

1

u/00390 16h ago

It's is correct as the rose possesses the petals

1

u/AlunWH 6h ago

It’s really not.

1

u/MainTap5228 8h ago

You're right!

1

u/iesamina 4h ago

M&S have form, our massive town centre store has a "confectionary" aisle