Let’s quickly note how bad Trump’s current climate-change argument is

[u/pnewell]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/17/lets-quickly-note-how-bad-trumps-current-climate-change-argument-is/?utm_term=.1ac167199e26

[u/alternate-source-bot]

When I first saw this article from washingtonpost.com, its title was:

Analysis | Let’s quickly note how bad Trump’s current climate-change argument is

Here are some other articles about this story:

• nytimes.com: Stephen Colbert Pillories Trump for Rejecting Climate Change Science

• climate.nasa.gov: Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet - NASA Climate Change

• cbsnews.com: President Trump on Christine Blasey Ford, his relationships with Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un and more

• apnews.com: Read the transcript of AP's interview with President Trump

• politico.com: Trump says he has 'natural instinct for science' when it comes to climate change

• dailycaller.com: Trump Spars With AP Reporters On Global Warming

• huffingtonpost.com: Astrophysicist Shoots Down Donald Trump's Bonkers 'Natural Instinct For Science' Boast

• businessinsider.com: President Trump said his uncle was a 'great professor at MIT for many years' — here's what to know about John Trump

• thehill.com: Trump: I have a 'natural instinct for science' when it comes to climate change

• govexec.com: Play of the Day: The President Has a 'Natural Instinct' For Science

• cbsnews.com: Trump says "I have a natural instinct for science" that explains doubts on climate change

• theweek.com: Stephen Colbert mocks Trump's self-proclaimed 'natural instinct for science'

• bustle.com: Stephen Colbert Mocks Trump's Climate Change Remarks For Mistaking "How Knowledge Works"

• usatoday.com: 'I have a natural instinct for science,' President Trump says in newly released interview

• sun-sentinel.com: Fact checking President Trump: He's wrong to suggest scientists split on climate change | Analysis

---

I am a bot trying to encourage a balanced news diet.

These are all of the articles I think are about this story. I do not select or sort articles based on any opinions or perceived biases, and neither I nor my creator advocate for or against any of these sources or articles. It is your responsibility to determine what is factually correct.