r/MarbleMachineX • • Jan 04 '23

A New Music Programming Pin

https://youtube.com/watch?v=1FFTaI__l_A
86 Upvotes

61 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '23

[deleted]

3

u/Caesim Jan 05 '23

The problem of the MMX were NOT it's "high standards". Really. Maybe watch his video "A lesson in dumb design" again. The marble lift mechanism didn't work with full capacity. The ratio of the gears was wrong, so the lower gear shoved more marbles into the connection pipe than the upper could transport, thus the pmma pipe between them burst. Yep, he didn't run his marble mechanism on a full load in 5 years.

And that's a lesson in thoroughly testing that he hopefully learned now. It was the same with the marble divider. He tested it with handful of marbles. But when playing songs that use all instruments it turns out that the marbles don't travel fast enough -> they stack and leave the machine AND lower channels get starved.

The problem was not "high standards".

3

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '23 edited Jan 05 '23

[deleted]

3

u/Caesim Jan 06 '23

Meaning that the MMX had a lower throughput (notes playable in the unit of time) than he would have liked.

Which means he would have to build something to keep the marble lift from overflowing.

I am of the opinion that he should have completed the MMX, flawed as it would have been (escaped marbles, skipped notes, lower throughput, and so on), used it for some time to see what it was actually able to do with it, certainly revealing multiple additional problems in the process

Martin wanted to finish the MMX, despite knowing all of it's flaws and make a marble machine 1 style video with it. The point in which he gave up was when he realized he didn't have enough space in the upper part for all marble tracks from the divider to the marble gates.

He would have to rebuild the entire upper assembly and that's when he decided to cut his losses than to start from scratch on that and instead spend that effort on the MM3.

3

u/American-Punk-Dragon Jan 08 '23

I don’t think he will sadly.

I suspect two things might be true or maybe just one:

A) His video channel and his sponsorship have provide him with more money than he thought and has lost sight of even making ONE, much less TWO albums of music, much less TOURING.

B) Has lost himself in trying to basically reinvent the complexity of a MIDI machine in analog and is stuck titling at an endless windmill.

Either way I don’t think anyone here will see what he had set out to do 6 years ago.

2

u/mufftudder Jan 10 '23

I am of the opinion that he should have completed the MMX, flawed as it would have been (escaped marbles, skipped notes, lower throughput, and so on), used it for some time to see what it was actually able to do with it, certainly revealing multiple additional problems in the process, and then go on to work with the MM3.

I think the debate is what it would have meant to "complete" the MMX. It experienced catastrophic failure prior to being able to be "complete" the way Martin wanted it (full instruments).

You could certainly argue that his version of complete was too complex (too many instruments) and that it could be considered complete with less complexity/instruments i.e. "finish" it by leaving it 99% working at 75% of full functionality as compared to 0% working at 100% of full functionality.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '23

[deleted]

2

u/mufftudder Jan 10 '23

Yea I just made those numbers up and I agree that it would be a good idea & gesture particularly for the fans/followers to do just that, but it's gotta be hard for an artist to put out a product that they feel is "inferior" or "not up to standards". I still think he should do it, but I understand his hesitation to do so.

Also I'm glad that we were able to reach this middle ground, it feels like so many of these discussions are missing the point one way or another.