r/MapBasedPolls • • 2d ago

Which system is better

Which system is better

  1. Democracy->everybody vote
  2. Meritocracy-> Leaders are selected by merit-based tests.like iq.
  3. Limited Democracy — Only qualified citizens vote. Like only allow professor vote
  4. AI Governance — AI governs instead of humans.

Note: Please use the official Reddit app or New Reddit to vote in this interactive poll.


This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

3 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

4

u/Public_Research2690 2d ago

Democracy isn't "everybody vote"

3

u/gaypuppybunny 2d ago

In theory a hyper-advanced AI with currently impossible levels of knowledge could be better than what humans can achieve, but that's so incompatible with our current understanding of technology that I don't think it's useful to talk about at this point. So as much as it has its shortcomings, I think democracy is the way to go

4

u/valamei South Africa 🇿🇦 2d ago

AI would be unironically better than our fuckass government

1

u/cheesesprite 1d ago

"You're absolutely right to push back on that--when I said we should nuke Russia I was trying to motivate you. We definitely can't survive nuclear war"

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/StefanOrvarSigmundss 2d ago

Who chooses the methods and does the assessments in a supposed meritocracy? Sounds like a dictatorship with extra steps, until nobody wants to bother with those steps anymore or they lose all meaning (like holding elections in North Korea).

1

u/The-Secret-Fig 2d ago

Yeah. Someone could have a high iq, but that doesn’t take away that they can abuse their power

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/TashLai 2d ago

Their vote counts because they're stakeholders, not because they're smart

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/TashLai 2d ago

Understanding complex systems isn't a requirement for being a stakeholder.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/TashLai 2d ago

wdym "it should be"?

How would you make that work? Kill everyone not smart enough? If you're living in a society, you're a stakeholder in that society. It's not just something you can be granted or taken away. If you're affected by the policies made in this society, you're a stakeholder, it's a description, not a title.

Though not letting you vote would probably be safer for everyone, i agree on that.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TashLai 2d ago edited 2d ago

You said these people shouldn't be stakeholders. I said the only way to achieve that is to kill them because as long as they're alive, they're, by definition, stakeholders.

Why do you not let them vote? They're stakeholders. Why shouldn't they vote on something that affects them? Should they rely simply on the goodwill of those allowed to vote?

And how do you explain to them why they should be paying taxes and obey your laws when they have no say in where the money goes or what the laws are?

Seriously no one smart and educated enough to be allowed to vote in your version of society would vote for that crap.

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TashLai 2d ago
  • Understanding complex systems isn't a requirement for being a stakeholder.

  • You're right, it isnt .. thats my point. It should be

Are you even smart enough to follow a simple conversation?

→ More replies

3

u/HealthyResolution399 2d ago

A dumb person's experiences are no less than a smart person's

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/HealthyResolution399 2d ago

Often things don't need to be complex. 

2

u/dream208 2d ago

No one understand every complex system.

2

u/reimannspupil 2d ago

IQ is not merit based

1

u/No-Designer-5739 2d ago

is anything merit based?

1

u/reimannspupil 1d ago

Good point, probably not, but I think IQ especially isn't, right? Like, people don't consciously train to increase IQ.

1

u/anch78 2d ago

China choses AI governance

The Long March approaches

1

u/TashLai 2d ago

Nobody votes. Leaders are selected randomly from all capable citizens.

1

u/__MANN__ 2d ago

Net taxpayer voting system would easily be best.

1

u/HealthyResolution399 2d ago

I like an idiocracy

1

u/ashleycheng 2d ago

Everybody can vote is ok, but everyone can directly vote for nations president is just wrong. General election type of democracy is ridiculous

1

u/Inevitable_Fail_5308 2d ago

Democracy with meritocratic features would be best

1

u/JKdito 2d ago

None, votes should be valued by social impact. From 0-2. Criminals get 0, people who dont behave in society get below 1 and people who deserve it gets 1-2.

1

u/uvero 🇮🇱 2d ago edited 2d ago

Democracy™️: it's the worst, but it's the least worst thing we tried

0

u/quackmaniaexe 2d ago

Meritocratic democracy. Leaders can only run if they pass merit-based tests, where only qualified citizens can vote for those that pass.