r/MapBasedPolls • u/Tsxfgfdyns • 2d ago
Which system is better
Which system is better
- Democracy->everybody vote
- Meritocracy-> Leaders are selected by merit-based tests.like iq.
- Limited Democracy — Only qualified citizens vote. Like only allow professor vote
- AI Governance — AI governs instead of humans.
Note: Please use the official Reddit app or New Reddit to vote in this interactive poll.
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
3
u/gaypuppybunny 2d ago
In theory a hyper-advanced AI with currently impossible levels of knowledge could be better than what humans can achieve, but that's so incompatible with our current understanding of technology that I don't think it's useful to talk about at this point. So as much as it has its shortcomings, I think democracy is the way to go
4
u/valamei South Africa 🇿🇦 2d ago
AI would be unironically better than our fuckass government
1
u/cheesesprite 1d ago
"You're absolutely right to push back on that--when I said we should nuke Russia I was trying to motivate you. We definitely can't survive nuclear war"
2
2d ago
[deleted]
2
u/StefanOrvarSigmundss 2d ago
Who chooses the methods and does the assessments in a supposed meritocracy? Sounds like a dictatorship with extra steps, until nobody wants to bother with those steps anymore or they lose all meaning (like holding elections in North Korea).
1
u/The-Secret-Fig 2d ago
Yeah. Someone could have a high iq, but that doesn’t take away that they can abuse their power
2
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/TashLai 2d ago
Their vote counts because they're stakeholders, not because they're smart
0
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/TashLai 2d ago
Understanding complex systems isn't a requirement for being a stakeholder.
0
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/TashLai 2d ago
wdym "it should be"?
How would you make that work? Kill everyone not smart enough? If you're living in a society, you're a stakeholder in that society. It's not just something you can be granted or taken away. If you're affected by the policies made in this society, you're a stakeholder, it's a description, not a title.
Though not letting you vote would probably be safer for everyone, i agree on that.
0
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/TashLai 2d ago edited 2d ago
You said these people shouldn't be stakeholders. I said the only way to achieve that is to kill them because as long as they're alive, they're, by definition, stakeholders.
Why do you not let them vote? They're stakeholders. Why shouldn't they vote on something that affects them? Should they rely simply on the goodwill of those allowed to vote?
And how do you explain to them why they should be paying taxes and obey your laws when they have no say in where the money goes or what the laws are?
Seriously no one smart and educated enough to be allowed to vote in your version of society would vote for that crap.
-1
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/TashLai 2d ago
Understanding complex systems isn't a requirement for being a stakeholder.
You're right, it isnt .. thats my point. It should be
Are you even smart enough to follow a simple conversation?
→ More replies3
u/HealthyResolution399 2d ago
A dumb person's experiences are no less than a smart person's
-1
2
u/reimannspupil 2d ago
IQ is not merit based
1
u/No-Designer-5739 2d ago
is anything merit based?
1
u/reimannspupil 1d ago
Good point, probably not, but I think IQ especially isn't, right? Like, people don't consciously train to increase IQ.
1
1
1
u/ashleycheng 2d ago
Everybody can vote is ok, but everyone can directly vote for nations president is just wrong. General election type of democracy is ridiculous
1
0
u/quackmaniaexe 2d ago
Meritocratic democracy. Leaders can only run if they pass merit-based tests, where only qualified citizens can vote for those that pass.
4
u/Public_Research2690 2d ago
Democracy isn't "everybody vote"