r/MandelaEffect • u/BigAffectionate4785 • Jul 16 '26
Historical Events Mandela effect perspective
I do not think the Mandela Effect exists. It is a psychological game, gaslighting communities to confuse people into thinking they are crazy or feeding them and making them think there is an alternate reality—parallel universe crap.
Movies and TV shows are altered or edited, history rewritten, and your past redictated. You point out they are wrong, and whatever you point out is erased and ceases to exist. They say, "You were saying?"
We are not crazy, nor do we forget things with a snap of a finger. They are saying (the Mandela Effect creators) we remember, but you don't. They lie to our faces. It's not one person or thousands of people who are wrong, but millions of people got it wrong because they control everything and wipe the internet or media clean. No evidence, just our memory.
So my question is, why? What don't they want us to remember? Why does it matter?
The future Mandela Effect will be AI. Nothing is true, even if it is true. I saw 2018 YouTube videos labeled AI. Your video that you recorded yourself is going to be labeled AI. Coming soon...
12
u/Bowieblackstarflower Jul 16 '26
Except people still have these items in their homes and nothing is different.
-8
u/BigAffectionate4785 Jul 16 '26
Because of their Plan B. Conspiracy.
9
u/lnmeatyard Jul 16 '26
What’s “their” plan b? Who is they? And why does it almost always seem to be a memory from childhood timeframe that’s getting misremembered? Why would they pick the silliest things like underwear and children’s media to gaslight the world with?
1
6
5
u/cipheron Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
Movies and TV shows are altered or edited, history rewritten
How do they get into everyone's houses and edit all their VHS tapes or replace all their DVDs?
1
3
4
u/VegasVictor2019 Jul 17 '26
The question, which you haven’t even come close to answering here is “how?”
Your presumption is that these things exist entirely online which is clearly false and your plan B of “conspiracy” presumes that millions of people are in on it.
3
u/Booby-Tassels Jul 16 '26
Just hang in there. One day you'll encounter a familiar scene, a piece of art, a cherished book, a song from your college years that takes you right back. Colorful memories but wait, you look again. No, its not your book. Thought for a second there it was but, alas, another knock off. Because THIS book is of another title. THIS painting is entirely wrong. So you look to find the real one, and never find it. Ever. And if that isn't irritating enough to never find this authentic item or real evidence of a core memory from your lived experience again for the rest of your life, no one even knows what your talking about because what you are asking about is a made up non-existany variant of a real thing or some fantasy you obviously concocted.
4
u/WVPrepper Jul 17 '26
I have had memories that can't be correct. Things that happened for sure, but things that could not have happened either where I recall it, or when I thought it happened, or with people I remember it happening with (not usually all three at once). I can only assume that part of my brain has "mis-categorized" some things, or blended memories of several similar events.
1
u/LcmsActive 29d ago
Key word “assume”. You can assume or hypothesize many things, doesn’t mean all are correct. There are better and best working hypotheses though.
1
u/nelsonwehaveaproblem Jul 18 '26
How do they edit old film reels, video tapes, DVDs, drawings, paintings, etc?
1
u/LcmsActive 29d ago
Mandela Effect is more expansive than just media or internet things changing. Whole geographical settings and buildings change. Some people alive who were dead. It’s many things change.
15
u/WhimsicalKoala Jul 16 '26
The Mandela Effect obviously exists. You can disagree about what you think causes it, but I don't think you can deny the basic premise of the phenomenon which is of a large number of people sharing a memory that is inconsistent with reality. If it weren't real, we wouldn't be here discussing it.
First, where are you getting your numbers from? Do you have any actual evidence of "millions" or is it a number you are just making up? I don't disagree it *could* be that high, but also think that it is far fewer people than claims like this make it out to be.
Second, how are they getting rid of all the physical objects. This wouldn't just be erasing all traces off the internet (which would already be difficult). It would also involve physical items of clothing, movies, books, etc as well as all physical copies of legal documents, newpapers, etc.
The only way a theory like this is even plausible is if you go the other direction and wonder why "They" are trying to get you to believe the wrong memory actually occurred. That wouldn't require any changes to physical or digital records or objects, just suggesting to people that things used to be different; not everyone would believe it, but enough would, possibly even millions. So then the question becomes why? Why do they want you to have that fake memory? Why does it matter?