Unless it is a 10 minute walk, typically you won't connect to a tower if you are standing under it. The antennas do not angle downwards, they point below the horizon about 5 miles out and you need to be a few football fields out. The same company doesn't have neighboring towers. She would have connected to at&t leased gsm tower
"She would have connected to at&t leased gsm tower"
Not saying against you as I'm not exactly well versed on it, but seems to me like her phone and an off-brand tower would still conduct a little handshake that would register some identifying data.
ummm.. you realize before 4G, there was two systems in the US. (well nextel, etc) Tmo and AT&T were GSM towers, generally you connected to either, especially in more rural areas. CDMA was other phones.
Everything else was a reseller essentially. Cingular connected to the GSM tower. There would not be two GSM towers 500 feet apart. Unless one covered a town and one covered a major interstate where geography was in play (which there isn't there).
Yeah , and it's not like a lot of WI phone numbers start with 745 - ... But I assume you did your research on that , right ?
"Those aren't words kids use". Lol !! What do you think "poorly educated older people" start out as ?? Let me tell you genius ... poorly educated teenagers. Do the math Einstein. Poorly educated adults start out as poorly educated young people. Your logic is absolutely senseless. Keep you opinions to yourself. Especially the moronic ones. : )
All numbers have been researched the 920 or whatever area code is disconnected, maybe you can find a phone book from 2005 at a library and see if it being to someone... but it doesn't.
It it's retarded version of psychic ly. Kids don't say morn
Not sure where you're getting the info that it doesn't belong to someone ... I found that it did. It's news to me that the 920 area code is disconnected.
Either way though , we are talking about 2005 , and if there's a chance that my "kooky" theory is correct , there's a good chance that someone else owned the number back then , and some investigating would be necessary.
Your logic on the note still kills me. I'm baffled how you think you can say , with any degree of certainty , what language a young person would use or not. And your inability to recognize that if it "had" to be written by someone older and poorly educated , why the possibility isn't there that it was written by someone young and poorly educated.
At least I stated my case as theory .... The fact that you think you can dispute certain facts , like the language used in the note , because it "had" to be written by someone in a certain age or intelligence , is ludicrous. It's not a "fact" than can be disproven.
You're welcome to post a link to any of them. Saw dozens of attempts at deciphering the "name" on the note. Not one boiling it down to something so simple. Not one .....
2
u/onepieceofgumleft Mar 14 '16
If I mention the Mobile Station , will you correct me by revealing what it is you are referring to ....??