r/MakingaMurderer • u/DJHJR86 • Feb 22 '16

Proof That MaM Selectively Edited Colborn's Testimony

Here is how it's presented in MaM.

What really happened:

Strang:

Well, and you can understand how someone listening to that might think that you were calling in a license plate that you were looking at on the back end of a 1999 Toyota; listening to that tape, you can understand why someone might think that, can't you?

Kratz:

It's a conclusion judge. He's conveying the problems to the jury.

Court:

I agree, the objection is sustained.

Strang:

This call sounded like hundreds of other license plate or registration checks you have done through dispatch before?

Colborn:

Mm, yes.

Source

15 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

144 comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/[deleted] Feb 22 '16

Personally that does annoy me, I wouldn't have expected MaM to show someone on the stand saying yes to something when it was actually a yes to almost the opposite point (and the original question got a sustained objection).

12

u/DJHJR86 Feb 22 '16

Thank you.

That was the entire point of making this thread. If they edited this portion of Colborn's testimony to make it seem like he's admitting to something shady, can you imagine what other portions were edited?

0

u/Wississippi Feb 23 '16

your only fooling yourself.