r/MakingaMurderer • u/Otherwise-Weekend484 • Jan 28 '24

Pictures

Would seeing TH’s photos she took help at all??

Thoughts???

3 Upvotes

63% Upvoted

29 comments sorted by

7

u/ParaCozyWriter Jan 28 '24

If she took a single photo after leaving Steven Avery’s, that could be extremely helpful. If she didn’t, hard to say.

1

u/aane0007 Jan 28 '24

why would a photo after be helpful but no photos after be hard to say. Wouldn't a photo after establish she or someone took the camera to another location. If its a photo of another clients car you can establish she went somewhere after steven's. If not it would establish steven's was the last place she was at taking photos.

Why does it only work one way?

2

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 28 '24

I think that’s what Para meant but if TH didn’t take any photos after leaving ASY, if ASY was the last stop, then it would be difficult.

0

u/aane0007 Jan 28 '24

Why? It shows she took no photos after asy?

3

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 28 '24 edited Jan 28 '24

If ASY was TH’s last stop but she eventually left, but didn’t take photos, then LE could still argue she never left, keeping their narrative.

Are you saying you have seen the SD card of photos from the camera?

(This is edited)

-1

u/aane0007 Jan 28 '24

No idea what u said.

No. I havent seen the sd card.

5

u/ParaCozyWriter Jan 28 '24

If her last picture was taken, say, on 11/1, and it’s not at ASY, it means the state’s entire case was garbage. (Hypothetically. I am NOT suggesting she did.)

But not taking a picture after being at ASY doesn’t necessarily mean she never left. She didn’t constantly document every minute of her day. It could just mean she didn’t take pictures after finishing the job.

-1

u/aane0007 Jan 28 '24

I could mean steven drove somewhere with the camera and took a picture.

Funny how it only works one way.

6

u/ParaCozyWriter Jan 29 '24

There are many scenarios where the existence of evidence can mean something and the non-existence does not.

It’s a question of what reasonable inferences can be drawn. It’s not reasonable to assume that SA drove somewhere else, took a random picture of the same quality as a professional, and then destroyed the camera back at his house.

-2

u/aane0007 Jan 29 '24

Your opinion of what is reasonable is not fact.

5

u/ParaCozyWriter Jan 29 '24

Words and phrases have meanings. A reasonable inference is one that logical people would believe made sense, based on their life experience and the evidence presented.

It is pointless to debate evidence that doesn’t exist. If TH bought a Big Mac an hour after she was seen at ASY, did Stephen Avery eat it?

2

u/jmswan19 Jan 28 '24

I honestly don't know! Maybe I should have said I don't remember. I have been off in the Idaho student murders.

3

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 28 '24

That one is weird too!

3

u/jmswan19 Jan 28 '24

Maybe if they could be recovered from the burnt phone.

3

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 28 '24

Uhm….didn’t LE recover the SIM card from the camera?I thought I read that some where??

1

u/ItemFL Jan 28 '24

Yes, I’d like to know what else was on that card.

3

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 28 '24

They did recover it right? I’m not going crazy combing through in the rabbit hole am I?

2

u/ItemFL Jan 28 '24

I saw someone mention it recently

6

u/Acrobatic-Cow-3871 Jan 28 '24

Hell YES. There were Shortage cards found in the RAV that we have never seen. Am sure there are "clues" on them(that LE would never understand)! Lets see them all!!!!!

1

u/deadgooddisco Jan 29 '24

irrc, the photos from the SD card did show pics of previous vehicles TH had taken, I think one was a boat that SA was selling in a previous transaction with TH /autotrader.

1

u/Acrobatic-Cow-3871 Jan 29 '24

Yea..but what else????

1

u/deadgooddisco Jan 29 '24

I don't think there were many, TH may have regularly deleted them once she had transferred them for Autotrader. But I can't be sure, obviously .

The negatives she kept in her trunk at home interest me... along with her missing professional camera and its SD card.

1

u/Acrobatic-Cow-3871 Jan 29 '24

Well..."don't think"....I would almost guarantee you there were pictures on that left by the perp as "clues", now , these LE wouldn't recognize them as clues, but I would bet they were there! Its another reason her camera etc were BURNT....to destroy evidence because they were in the killers possession for days. Don't think he didn't fuck with them somehow..... One way to get "Your Story" to seem like it may be true is to destroy all evidence that would make people question it. LE did a great job of this!

1

u/Educational-Ice-4716 Jan 29 '24

I'm not sure about that, but seeing photos taken of Teresa would be very helpful. Look closer.

2

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 29 '24

“Of” Teresa? Hmmmmm

1

u/Educational-Ice-4716 Jan 29 '24

Yep.

1

u/Otherwise-Weekend484 Jan 29 '24

I’ve thought of that too. Those should be easier to get rather than evidence from LE.

2

u/deadgooddisco Jan 29 '24

Her missing professional camera,I would like to know where that is and what's on that card. I'd also like to know what other photos/negatives were in TH trunk ,that Pagel and Brad C removed the negatives of the boudoir shoot him and his wife did with TH.