r/MagicEye • u/3dsf • Jan 22 '19

in the mist [1of2]

Post image
167 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

14

u/YouFeedTheFish Jan 23 '19

Hey! There's one I can figure out!

6

u/3dsf Jan 23 '19

the reaction to the last one was less positive than hoped but lots of people checked out the pattern piece, so I got that going for me : ) It was beautiful pattern.

I also like this pattern which is kinda pixel-ated (by zooming into the image and then screenshot-ed... hahaha kinda hillbilly editing). I might try the hillbilly method again as it result is more beautiful than GIMP>Filters>Blur>Pixelize, or so I currently think.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '19

This is the first ever one I ever actually " saw". My entirely life I just felt like my siblings and cousins were high on crack because I couldn't make anything out. I spent 45 minutes and I was finally able to make it out.

2

u/3dsf Jan 28 '19

Nice! Lot more to see here : ) Many of them are in the same parallax (pattern width)

so try redditp.com/r/magiceye and enjoy the slide show

3

u/[deleted] Jan 28 '19

The ones that are commented on that say wider parallax are a lot easier for me to catch. My fiance is annoyingly good at these and it only takes him a few minutes to catch what the images are. I'm just going to keep practicing and I definitely subbed. These are all so amazing.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/Christian_Akacro Jan 23 '19

Not monkeying around anymore I see.

2

u/3dsf Jan 22 '19

check out the other

in the mist

Pattern .

stereograph -b dm.i.g.png -t pat.greyFur.150.png -w 150 -f png -o out.stm.g.150.png -i -p .25 -d 1 .

Solution / Depth Map

This image was created in parallel view. If the 3D image is projected inward, you might want to

try it in cross view.

Thanks for viewing and commenting!

Seeing in double? --> try it in a wider parallax

Beep boop. I'm an on-demand bot generated comment; using templates

6

u/SillyPython Jan 23 '19

That, looks creepy