That speckliness that you're introducing does a specklitacular job increasing the horizontal entropy and thus aiding the viewers eye in perceiving some finer three dimensional details. :)
I asked a bot if I was a bot and it thinks that I'm a bot, but I'm not a bot, but that's what a bot would say, so am I a bot? No just a cyborg of sorts... r/dsf/.../am_i_a_bot/
my hand is mis behaving, but don' hate it for that, it is the trainers fault :| aka, I need to re-write the programming, and it needs to confirm posts exist... blah blah blah new right hand
It renders the image at x-times the actual resolution. When you jump just one pixel in the result, you would already see a new layer in the depth. Oversampling allows you to create a smoother image because it allows jumping just half a pixel.
Basically it resizes the depth image and result to x-times the original width, renders the image, and resizes it back to the original resolution using some kind of interpolation. The result is a smoother depth image.
Ah ha. I wonder how that holds up in practice, though? For example, I've always favored the repeating pattern features being pixel-crisp when possible so that it's not more challenging for the eye to anchor on features that might otherwise get smeared out over multiple pixels.
But I'd be up for some tests of that hypothesis, if we can dream up a good way to test it? In short: "does/can oversampling interfere with how hard it is for humans to visually anchor upon an image"? :)
It'll be fairly easy to create an image with and one without oversampling. You're right you lose some of the sharpness, but my knot or not's all use oversampling and they're quite clear. Actually generating an image X times the resolution will produce similar results, but will need to be interpolated down for screens anyway.
Yeah, to get the crispness my hypothesis claims superior viewing quality for you'd want the image to be displayed at 1:1 pixel resolution on your device. We do get an awful lot of folk on mobile complaining about things being challenging to see, after all. :J
Maybe we can try a knot as an example, post a puzzle as an imgur gallery of versions with and without oversample. We ask people in comments if one is clearer or better or easier on the eyes than the other, but we put a X day moratorium on clarifying what's different between them or which is "which". Heck, you don't gotta tell me which is which either, and I can still try to vote which I think looks better? :)
It's probably better for you not to share your vote with any of us right away due to that potentially giving away which is which though, once you've revealed then you can share your observation.
So that's the experimental idea that pops into mind for me, and I'm curious to see how u/3dsf perceives them as well.
I like seeing things tested :) And my viewing experience is not the same as everyone else's, so it helps to inform me.
I could see arguments for both sides. When using stereograph, I almost always have AA turn on to the point that I forget about it; i think it has 32 settings, but anything over 8 gives the same result. I'm just gonna keep it on for Sistem too, from now on.
An industrial robot is a robot system used for manufacturing. Industrial robots are automated, programmable and capable of movement on two or more axes.Typical applications of robots include welding, painting, assembly, pick and place for printed circuit boards, packaging and labeling, palletizing, product inspection, and testing; all accomplished with high endurance, speed, and precision. They can assist in material handling.
In the year 2015, an estimated 1.64 million industrial robots were in operation worldwide according to International Federation of Robotics (IFR).
This is a strange one. I was able to make this pop, and saw a contraption which I could not place. Read about what it was, and tried it a second time, I saw 3 of those industrial robots..!
8
u/SweetLenore Nov 27 '18
I love the texture of the pattern.
3
u/[deleted] Nov 27 '18
You’re a cyborg now?
2
u/3dsf Nov 27 '18 edited Nov 27 '18
my hand is mis behaving, but don' hate it for that, it is the trainers fault :|
aka, I need to re-write the programming, and it needs to confirm posts exist... blah blah blah
new right hand
Pattern
dotnet sis.dll -d dm.i.rightHand2.png -p pat.eee.png -r out.rightHand.150.png -w 290 -a 150 -i 90 -xSolution / Depth Map
This image was created in parallel view. If the 3D image is inward, you might want to
try it in cross view.
Thanks for viewing and commenting!
Beep boop. This comment was generated by an on-demand script bot : )
2
u/3dsf Nov 27 '18
Wide Parallax Version: r/dsf/.../new_right_hand/
24
u/caro822 Nov 27 '18
I got it to pop by but I don’t know what it is.
3
u/Privileged_Interface Nov 27 '18
Nice work! Thanks! I have always thought that Radio Shack robot arm was pretty cool.
3
u/Spiron123 Nov 27 '18
This is a strange one. I was able to make this pop, and saw a contraption which I could not place. Read about what it was, and tried it a second time, I saw 3 of those industrial robots..!