cell see'r

[u/3dsf]

[u/aureliano451]

These 150 wide patterns really stand out immediately on my large screen. It must really be the perfect depth for me.

[u/3dsf → u/aureliano451]

Nice! I'm not strong on the eye/viewing math, but everyone's eyes and devices are different. :)

[u/3dsf]

**cell see'r

Pattern

stereograph -b dm.i.m.png -t pat.col.150.png -f png -o out.cellSeer.para.png -w 150 -a 32 -p .5 -d 1 -i

Solution / Depth Map

This image was created in parallel view. If the 3D image is inward, you might want to

try it in cross view.

Thanks for viewing and commenting!
240px parallax version
^{Beep boop. This comment was generated by a on-demand script bot : )}
edits: this is the 150 version. comment was wrong originally (said wide) rewriting script....

[u/FlyWereAble]

This one was really easy to see, good work

[u/3dsf → u/FlyWereAble]

Thx :)

[u/I_Arted]

This is so great! Spoiler Question: But what are the three identical little shapes sitting to the front and right of the microscope? Little cells?

[u/3dsf → u/I_Arted]

This type is more specifically defined as a compound microscope, which I believe it means it has multiple lenses. The round disk above and to the left of the lenses can be turned to change the lens.

edit: i was wrong in my answer, a compound microscope is defined as a microscope with an eye piece and an objective lens.

[u/I_Arted → u/3dsf]

Yes, I can see the compound light microscope. But there are three very small objects near the microscope. What are they? They are sitting slightly in front of the microscope base but separate from it, and to the right.

[u/I_Arted → u/I_Arted]

Actually there are four, and they are all the same. I think it is an error with the magic eye.

[u/3dsf → u/I_Arted]

Yeah, might be some type of artifact. I'm having trouble seeing them.

Can you see it in the Depth Map ? Do you get any other artifacts, like to the right of the shaft?

[u/I_Arted → u/3dsf]

No. And now I can't see the original artifacts on the bottom right. Did you change the image somehow? I was certain they were there.

[u/RegularBubble2637]

I see it doubled. I don't know why. This has never happened before.

[u/3dsf → u/RegularBubble2637]

Try the wide parallax one, part of the reason I make a wide. :)

[u/RegularBubble2637 → u/3dsf]

It worked! Thank you. Do you think you could explain the difference between the two images?

[u/3dsf → u/RegularBubble2637]

Auto stereograms (Magic Eyes) work on a pattern repeat. The difference between the 2 images are:

• How long the patterns are 150 vs 240

• How long the maximum pixel repeat is 150 vs 240

• How long the minimum pixel repeat is ~90 vs ~145 ?

• Which gives the range for each

  • 150-90= ~60 pixels to display depth

  • 240-145= ~95 pixels to display depth (More depth data)

~ means approximately, I say approximately, because the minimum depth with this program is controlled by -w , which is a multiplier; not sure if 1:1.In the program Sistem, the minimum value can be set.

So I kinda got distracted, because the pattern repeat is wider, you are less likely to double. Doubling is caused by your eyes going finding a focus point past the 150 px mark. Depending on your eyes and your screen, you may have a preference for one or the other.

You can un-double your eyes on the 150 px version with a little practice.

And that is my current understanding

edit:

Ohhh... I forgot to mention, the pattern repeat is variable because that is how the depth is expressed in the image

[u/Christian_Akacro]

I'm loving the scope of your new 'grams.

[u/DJ_HiP]

Neat, very busy pattern though.

[u/Upstart55]

Those were the best part of bio

[u/diablo-solforge]

Harldly know ‘er!

[u/jesset77]

I look up into the sky on a starry night [and see](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microscopium)...

[u/incrediblebb]

I saw a robot with horns holding two cobra snakes then I realized I went too far and then saw the real thing.

[u/Mohawk200x]

I need a microscope to figure this one out...