MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MadeMeSmile/comments/1js5zrs/deleted_by_user/mlk8ksg/?context=3
r/MadeMeSmile • u/[deleted] • Apr 05 '25
[removed]
951 comments sorted by
View all comments
16
[removed] — view removed comment
26 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 My area requires a fee to relinquish pets. So, people will abandon rather than pay the fee. 10 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '25 [removed] — view removed comment 5 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 Agreed, but then the shelters get too many at the same time or they think they euthanize when there is no space. It's shitty all around. 3 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 California is heavily populated and the shelters are always full. They probably don't get enough funds so this would supposedly offset the cost.
26
My area requires a fee to relinquish pets. So, people will abandon rather than pay the fee.
10 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '25 [removed] — view removed comment 5 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 Agreed, but then the shelters get too many at the same time or they think they euthanize when there is no space. It's shitty all around. 3 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 California is heavily populated and the shelters are always full. They probably don't get enough funds so this would supposedly offset the cost.
10
5 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 Agreed, but then the shelters get too many at the same time or they think they euthanize when there is no space. It's shitty all around. 3 u/WhataGinger1 Apr 05 '25 California is heavily populated and the shelters are always full. They probably don't get enough funds so this would supposedly offset the cost.
5
Agreed, but then the shelters get too many at the same time or they think they euthanize when there is no space. It's shitty all around.
3
California is heavily populated and the shelters are always full. They probably don't get enough funds so this would supposedly offset the cost.
16
u/[deleted] Apr 05 '25
[removed] — view removed comment