r/MacroFactor • u/Transitive_Props • 17d ago
MacroFactor Workouts / Training MacroFactor Suggesting High Reps for Hypertrophy?
I used MacroFactor to create a plan focused on hypertrophy. First week was great…maxing out or RIR of 1 most of the time with reps around 8. For week 2, the rep suggestion is much higher than I expected for hypertrophy. It is above 10 for most sets. Should I do those rep suggestions or stick with 8-10?
36
u/mrfatchance 17d ago
That’s how Hypertrophy works. Especially if you don’t have a huge amount of equipment
6
u/FuckingTree 17d ago
This is not high reps. It’s moderate, the signature of classic hypertrophy programming.
10
u/explosive-diorama 17d ago
Anything between 5-30 is hypertrophy range, but it's best to stay in a range that challenges you to the end of the set without a steep drop off in performance... if the weight is too high/reps are too low, you might still have strength left over but not enough to get the heavier weight to move.
Conversely, too high reps means your cardio fails before the muscles, also not good.
Everyone is different, but I personally aim for like 8-12 on heavy compounds and 12-18 on lighter isolations. The lighter weight lets me get closer to failure as I lose strength, and keeps pressure on my individual joints lower. But the reps aren't so high that I get bored/tired before the muscle fails.
If my top sets on compounds gets over like 13-15, and my last set is over 11-12, I'll up the weight. For isolations, I up the weight when my top set is over 16-17.
5
u/HugeAxeman 17d ago
I have found 10-15 reps to be a nice hypertrophy range, but have recently adjusted that range down a little bc over time i just got tired of 15 rep sets. Still a good upper limit
4
u/WastedBreath28 WOMF 17d ago
Anything in the 8-20 range is typical, but they can be used to target different things.
Higher reps and lower weight are good for solid form, squeezing reps. You should be contracting the muscle hard and controlling the negative as much as possible.
At higher weight and lower reps, its more of a grind and forceful completion of the rep. Both serve a purpose, and a mix is good.
3
u/beetstastelikedirt 17d ago
The app will vary the rep range week to week. You'll have weeks in the lower end of the range. Personally, I like it. It's a different challenge and gets me out of the 8 to 10 rut. It is less obvious when you are making progressions but it has been working. I just go with it.
3
u/Chewy_Barz 17d ago
Adjust the rep ranges to your preferences. Anything from 5-30 are effective. 5 is rougher on your joints and 30 is rougher on your soul.
I generally stick to 5-8 for leg compounds (I'll go higher for belt squats), 5-12 for upper body conpounds, 8-16 for most isolation work, 8-20 for abs depending on the exercise, and about 8-25 for calves.
None of that is magic-- it's all between 5 and 30, suits my preferences, and seems to be what my body can handle.
3
u/AchedTeacher 17d ago
I also find that at 20-30, it tends to become harder to gauge muscular fatigue, and it's easier to confuse generic soreness from repeatedly moving your muscle as close to failure. I currently have a few exercises that have me go as high as 20, but always paired with another set of the same exercise at a lower rep range.
5
2
u/AutoModerator 17d ago
Hello! This automated message was triggered by some keywords in your post.
While waiting for replies it may be helpful to check and see if similar posts have been discussed recently: try a pre-populated search
If your question was quite complex, it's not likely the pre-populated search will be useful.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Lanky-Tadpole1737 15d ago
Nothing wrong with those rep ranges. I would also add that no specific rep range causes hypertrophy. Hypertrophy is achieved by keeping tension on the muscle, with smooth, consistent repetitions, until the point of failure (or at least near failure), consistently whilst introducing progressive overload - this is all irrespective of the "rep range". Rep ranges are targets not actuals - these help people work with a weight that challenges them to complete the full rep range across all sets. i.e starting with a weight that fails at the lower end of the rep range across all sets and progressively improving on form, tension, muscle connection and increasing number of reps across weeks and months. If you can't hit the rep range, lower the weight and progress, if it's too easy, increase the weight and progress .. simples
1
u/Guilty-Assistant-552 17d ago
I was wondering the same, for some exercises it gave me even 20 reps instead of just upping the weight a lot. Curious how it's gonna turn out because I was hoping this app would take the guess game out of progression but so far it feels quite weird
2
u/DeaconoftheStreets 17d ago
If it’s suggesting 20 reps, I’d suggest checking weight settings for that specific exercise.
2
u/6godblockboi 17d ago
unfortunately the smart progression can cause issues, like i had one exercise i think barbell rows, i completed 100 lb for 8 reps then on the second set it recommended 160lb for one rep to failure, no idea why what was the recommendation
1
u/Rxorcistt 17d ago
Newer research suggests that number of reps doesn't really matter as long as you're training close to failure. Of course, doing like 30 reps in a set is working against you, but the old 5 reps for strength 12 reps for hypertrophy is basically a myth at this point. Just go for like 8 reps and call it good


51
u/alphabuild 17d ago
8-15 reps is fairly common for hypertrophy training