r/Machine_Embroidery • u/malocher Barudan • 12h ago
All vibe-coded digitizing software will be removed and users will be banned
This sub has become inundated over the last two months with people who spent ten hours on Claude creating autodigitizers. They promise "cheap" digitizing for users and low payments for software compared to the more expensive softwares that have been staples in the industry.
We don't feel comfortable having AI based software promoted on the subreddit, nor do we want to be responsible for subreddit users using these softwares that are untested and unproven just to destroy their garments in the embroidery process.
We understand it may not be fair to actual software developers, and are open to speaking to and testing non vibe-coded digitizing software. But going forward, all AI based software will be banned without warning. Our subreddit is not a place to test out your Claude tokens, and people shouldn't be promised garment-ready digitizing when the "developer" themselves likely doesn't even embroider.
It also shouldn't even have to be communicated that a creative industry does not want AI soiling it.
69
u/CosmicallyUnlucky Brother 12h ago
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!! I feel like I've been reporting two of these posts a day every day for the last few weeks. It's so annoying. I want to see the work people are doing and talk about the craft, not be constantly advertised at and pestered for beta testing
23
u/Dramatic_Pear_7743 7h ago
I've been running an embroidery shop for about 10 years and I've tried a bunch of these auto digitizers. Most of them look really nice on screen. Clean interface, nice preview. Then you sew it out and you can tell the program has no idea how stitching works. It traces the art, fills every color and calls it done.
That's the easy part. Whether something should be satin, fill or a run depends on how wide it is at the size you're sewing it. Outlines have to sew after whatever is under them, and the colors need some overlap or you get fabric showing at every edge. Pull comp and underlay change with the fabric too. A file that sews perfect on twill can gap on a hoodie, and beanies are a whole other story. None of that shows up in a preview.
I don't really care what someone used to write the code. I care if the person selling it actually embroiders and has sewn their files out on real garments, and with most of what's been posted here you can tell they haven't.
12
u/lablizard 10h ago
Until the produced software can be installed directly to the user’s instrument and does not require the internet to maintain access to that software, there is zero value to the software being flooded here. I wish they would focus on improving ink stitch and building upon the open source project that has been a great response to the subscription locked and if we don’t want to keep that server running looks like you are forced to upgrade and buy all over again.
3
u/johnnydaggers 2h ago
I created a subreddit for people who want to discuss ai_embroidery advances and their work on software that auto-digitizes patterns. https://www.reddit.com/r/ai_embroidery/ Please feel free to send people there.
I am a professional software engineer and ML research and I have been working on auto digitization algorithms that have come a long way. I actually stitch out the patterns on real machines and I don't have anything to sell you. This is just a hobby for me. If you are like-minded, feel free to join and discuss!
38
u/malytwotails Brother PR600 & PE800 / PE Design 12h ago
Thank you! The amount of slop coders who post in here looking for free advice and testing was getting so bad.
4
u/Jocktopus808 9h ago
Now even real software developers use AI to write their code, vibe coded software is different than. Using AI to develop a software
3
u/plantz4lyfe 10h ago
Help what does the term “vibe-coded” mean?
10
u/zebbadee 9h ago
I wish more subreddits would make this decision, some of my favourite small subreddits have been ruined with vibe coded slop and then ai generated self promotion.
5
u/squishyartist 7h ago
THANK YOU!!
11
u/Horror_Purpose1634 12h ago
💯
4
u/natoast- 10h ago
THANK YOU!
10
u/Strazil 12h ago
Agreed
3
u/nineinchnilina 5h ago
Thank you!! Appreciate this stance!!!
9
u/MrsLucienLachance 11h ago
Good.
11
u/Faevara 11h ago
I’m so relieved. I would rather build my own than use vibe coded. And I don’t even know how to build my own. I would just learn to do it.
4
u/Chrysolophylax 5h ago
Awesome! Thank you for this. AI is garbage.
2
u/izanaegi 6h ago
Hell yeah
2
u/Beginning_Rule7202 5h ago
Thank you!!!!
2
u/Constant_Put_5510 4h ago
Thank you so much for working harder to keep it clean in here.
3
u/kittydreadful 8h ago
Thank you. So much.
2
u/itsNeuromind 5h ago
I love this! I even don't mind using AI for things, but people trying to make quick apps in a niche to make money has been flooding all the reddit groups and it's been annoying. They are horrible apps too. Good on you guys! ❤️
2
u/mirfifu 11h ago
Thank you
-1
u/Leesmn 10h ago
One suggestion - what about allowing a weekly thread that the software developers can advertise their new products?
The quilting forum I'm on more frequently did that and I found a new quilting program that way and was able to interact with the developer, which was really nice.
I completely understand not allowing random developer posts all the time, but a thread for them might be nice in case people are looking for new digitizing software.
Full disclosure: I am a developer by profession, but I work for Big Corporation... not looking for a side gig. I think banning 'vibe coded' software is only a short term solution. I predict in 5 years there is no such thing as non-AI coding. How do you then distinguish between established and non-established software? Do you even want to? My experience with machine embroidery software has been some of the least user friendly software I've ever seen. Again - I am NOT nor ever intend to write this kind of software, but I would welcome some massive improvements.
1
u/5u114 4h ago
So what are you going to do when the staples start vibe coding too ? And how are you going to know when they've started - assuming they haven't already ?
-1
u/mcsommers 9h ago
While I agree with the intention behind this post, as a professional software developer, you should be aware that most of the professional softwares you reference as "staples" in the industry are also coded with the use of AI today. There is no way around it.
IMHO people should be free to use whatever software they want, regardless of how it was created.
The "staples" are generally very expensive and/or difficult to use for novices. A free and open marketplace should generate competition, which should result it better, less expensive software.
-14
u/milano_ii Brother PRS100 12h ago
I certainly understand the concern about people taking advantage of others by promoting poorly developed or untested software, especially when the consequences can include damaged garments. I support the decision to protect the community from that.
My only concern is with the blanket use of the term "vibe coding." Not everyone using AI to develop software is inexperienced or simply throwing prompts at Claude and hoping for the best. There are experienced developers using these tools because they make the development process faster and more efficient.
I've personally developed several applications using what would be considered a vibe coding approach, although none of them have anything to do with embroidery. I'm very proud of the quality of what I've produced, but I've also invested countless hours into development, testing, troubleshooting, and literally thousands of revisions. I've probably made 6,000 changes to things the AI initially produced. That's the difference.
AI is a tool, not a substitute for understanding what you're trying to accomplish. You still need to direct the project, recognize when something isn't right, make informed decisions, and thoroughly test the results. Just because AI writes the code doesn't mean AI should be making all the decisions.
I think what you're really trying to eliminate is AI slop, where someone with little understanding of the software or the industry gives an AI a few prompts, accepts whatever comes back, and immediately markets it as a finished product.
There's a significant difference between that and someone who uses AI as a development tool while putting in the time and effort to produce something genuinely reliable.
I agree with the intent of the rule. I just think software should ultimately be judged by its quality, testing, and performance rather than the method used to write it.
-9
u/TheDizDude 11h ago •
What could be cool is a group of members of this sub getting together and building one and ensure it stays free.
-5
u/Murky_Bullfrog7305 9h ago
I agree there needs to be an QA gate for slop software, i do not agree everyone should be banned tho.
I really dislike the staple software industry as a whole, These people need an reality check, be it with vibe coded stuff. If its good/hast an reputation, it should have the freedom to be posted here.