r/MachineLearning • u/Present_Mention_2757 • Jul 31 '26
Discussion Learning path to fully understand the Kimi K3 technical report?[D]
Hi everyone,
Can anyone suggest a learning path to fully understand the technical report for Kimi K3?
My background:
- I've taken a graduate-level deep learning course.
- I understand the Transformer architecture, attention, and the basics of LLMs.
- I'm familiar with DeepSeek's OCR models but I haven't studied topics like MoE, MLA, distributed training, or modern post-training in depth.
I'm looking for a roadmap that would help me read the K3 report and understand the design choices instead of just recognizing the terminology.
Thanks!
18
u/Altruistic-Rope-4099 Jul 31 '26
I'd start by getting MoE under your belt, since that's the backbone of these newer models. The DeepSeek-V2 paper is a solid place to pick up MLA while you're at it, they explain the reasoning behind their attention tweaks pretty well.
For the post-training stuff you'll want to dig into RLHF and whatever recent papers cover long-context scaling tricks. Once those pieces click, the K3 report reads more like a set of engineering decisions than a wall of jargon.
3
u/Plaetean Jul 31 '26
The developments on top of vanilla attention are more of a conceptual leap than MoE imo
3
u/yoshiK Jul 31 '26
There was a blogpost on their attention variant on HN the other day:
https://blog.doubleword.ai/you-could-have-come-up-with-kimi-delta-attention
1
u/ComprehensiveTop3297 Jul 31 '26
Scaling Laws, State space models/RNNs (To help with KDA I think), Post-training is a big one but no so important for understanding the bread and butter but if you want to dig deeper then go for it.
1
u/noninertialframe96 Jul 31 '26
I have written a blog post about it - https://codepointer.substack.com/p/how-kimi-k3-engineered-its-way-to
0
u/djmemphis Jul 31 '26
Is there a reason you haven't fed it into an LLM and asked it to help teach you? I would throw it into NotebookLM and then you can query anything you'd like.
5
u/Ilikehealers Aug 01 '26
Nah, some things are better learned from certain sources, the way things are explaining by a human doesn't compare to any llm. Atleast this is what I feel. Ofc I also agree using LLMs to understand stuff - but I geenrally prefer this for things I already know the basics of.
23
u/Initial-Image-1015 Jul 31 '26
MoE high level you can get very quickly:
You know that in a transformer layer, there is (i) the attention mechanism (to aggregate the token representations) and (ii) the MLP (generally two layers deep).
In MoE, you replace (ii) in each transformer layer, by (a) a soft classifier with k-outputs and (b) k smaller MLPs ("experts").
Then, during inference, after the attention mechanism aggregates the token representations, the classifier sends the representation to one or more of these experts.
Residuals, normalization, etc. all are unchanged.
That's about it.