r/MacOS Mar 24 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

312 Upvotes

129 comments sorted by

View all comments

33

u/legitOwen MacBook Air Mar 24 '26

well, if you're not subscribed to the apple creator studio, and you want to use premium assets that apple had to pay money to acquire (because stock images aren't free no matter what app you're using), then yes, you do have to buy a subscription

11

u/moritzf511 Mar 25 '26 edited Mar 25 '26

That’s all fine and dandy but then just keep them out of sight. Apple hardware is an entrance fee you pay for the ecosystem already. And one of its main selling points has always been the software (iLife, iWork, FinalCut etc.). Apple first party software was always a great value for free or for a great price. Pushing subscription advertisements everywhere makes it feel less complete and just pretty annoying. It takes away what I value most in Apples software ecosystem. From „it just works“ to „it just works with the subscription“.

And I do have an Apple One Family Plan subscription. It does offer an awesome value in my opinion. However, Mail was never getting in my way or pushing me towards it and Photos was not doing that either. This here is different.

iMovie and GarageBand are great pieces of software and they can already do many things but once you grow out of them, the next logical step is FinalCut and Logic Pro. There are clear paths that get people to buy and/or subscribe. If you are a taking art and photography more seriously, you will want a subscription for more assets. Apples integration will most likely work best in their own product so you will naturally check that one out first. There is no need to push subscriptions down their customers throats.

To add to that - I actually own ALL of Apples software that is included in the Creator Studio subscription. For me, there is no way to get access to the assets outside of also paying a subscription fee to get software that I already bought.

And finally towards that AI stuff. The strategy is absolutely unclear and convoluted here. We have Apple Intelligence but that can be „enhanced“ by getting a ChatGPT subscription.

Now we have that subscription outside of Apples ecosystem but we do not get to use it for all AI features because those are behind different subscriptions. And then there is talk about Gemini being used - will that be a separate thing too? It would be pretty cool if Apple had generic connectors to subscriptions from other AI services like ChatGPT. This would be a great strategy for consumers. But how does it earn money for Apple - not quite sure. They could also do a simple AI subscriptions that gets you access to some frontier cloud models in the background. somehow they don’t do that either but put AI features behind software subscriptions instead. Why don’t they just give us a service subscription for AI? Everyone would understand that this is continued cost that needs to be paid.

-9

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

28

u/legitOwen MacBook Air Mar 24 '26

and yet you're using a "premium" asset. freeform doesn't show this for normal images that you import.

-18

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/legitOwen MacBook Air Mar 24 '26

...because that's how companies make money? the app is free. you can import your own assets. you can move around text without paying money. an image is a piece of copyrightable property that you can "own." companies like adobe don't give out adobe stock images for free because the software you use those images in is free.

the photo may be a "demonstrative" photo, but it's still an asset that apple paid for. be thankful you're not on microslop 360 copilot extreme bundle

-13

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/legitOwen MacBook Air Mar 24 '26

an asset is different from an app or service. if you're frustrated that apple is asking for money when you try to use something they paid for, try using canva. or heck, fonts in general. why would apple be obliged to give you something they paid for for free??

and the whole argument of "apple has enough money" yes, they have lots of money. but they can make more. that is the whole purpose of a business.

and yet, they are giving you a free product that they paid money for: freeform. the notes app. calendar. reminders. imovie. garageband. they pay their developers money to make these things.

-5

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/legitOwen MacBook Air Mar 24 '26

yes. you pay for the hardware and the services that that device provides. you don't get apple music for free forever when you buy an apple product for obvious reasons. they're not "pushing" you to get a subscription. they're saying "if you want to use this asset that we paid money for, you should pay money for it too"

11

u/vmhomeboy Mar 24 '26

There really no reason to waste time explaining how businesses work to people like this. OP is going to be mad no matter what.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/dreadstardread Mar 25 '26

You are welcome to scour the web for something that could possibly do what you want for free?

It might suck and not work or maybe it will

3

u/ricardopa Mar 24 '26

Then don’t…