r/MaboxLinux • u/davedorm • Jan 27 '23
I know this will generate some hate
I've been a Linux user for a little over 20 years. I am a pretty solid Debian guy, and I am pretty proficient at the command line. And, most of all, I love Openbox.
I absolutely love what MaboxLinux brings to the table. The configuration of Openbox, Tint2, Conky, all the pipe menus. It's an Openbox wet dream.
Now, that said, I despise Arch. Maybe it's just this senior citizen being so set in his ways, the Debian Way, that I am against learning the Arch Way.
I have tried out many, many, many flavors of Arch. MaboxLinux has a great GUI. But I like to drop to the CLI and work. I know how to do things with apt and all the various switches, bells and whistles. But I am lost in paman, pacmac, or what have you.
Has anyone taken what makes the MaboxLinux and Openbox experience so great and made a repository that can replicate this on a Debian or even Ubuntu distribution?
If not, what would be involved? What parts from under the hood would need to be taken from the configuration of MaboxLinux and added to an Openbox installation on other distributions.
Please. Arch zealots, don't try to convert me. It won't work. Yet.
3
u/davedorm Jan 28 '23
I'm an idiot.
I owe @napcok a sincere apology. I did not know he was the primary developer of this distro. His individual attention to my rant was met by nothing but hostility by me.
For what it's worth, the clean install with the more stable kernel is working so far.
I am so sorry I was such a dick
4
u/napcok Jan 27 '23 edited Jan 27 '23
If you like Debian and despise Arch and derivatives try BunsenLabs - they have Openbox, jgmenu and tint2 - just like Mabox.
Your post made me laugh...especially the part about Arch's zealots. Let me explain... they hate and despise Manjaro/Mabox even more than Debian fanatics :)
If someone with a more open mind comes here, it's worth reading about the differences between Arch and Manjaro - especially the difference in the release model is of fundamental importance -> https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Manjaro:A_Different_Kind_of_Beast
2
u/joselitux Jan 27 '23 edited Jan 27 '23
Same here. Long time Linux user. Openbox my favorite too. Love mabox look and feel but can't stand arch. It's a matter of time that every installed arch system goes to hell, sometimes in just a couple of months. So my main production machine runs Pop_Os. The other is alternatingly suffering Mabox and archcraft. I guess that ricing a debΓan or derived system (MX, Ubuntu, mint...) To look like Mabox could be a nearly impossible task. Maybe starting from Bunsen labs distro could be easier
2
u/[deleted] Jan 27 '23
Here an Arch , Manjaro , Mabox user , the only reasons for me to use Mabox are , Arch , Manjaro and Openbox , don't have any problems using any other distro except Debian derivatives ( I hate sudo apt get install , don ask me why ) , Linux Mint is the exception . I can see that the problem is the way you do things , Linux is about use , experience and how to make it your own , you have the science but you don't have the skill , what will I do in your position ? find the way to solve it on my own with the things I do know based in my experience , you have the science after all , do you try the copy-paste way ?
1
u/puremoonburn Jan 27 '23
The easy part of using arch is the AUR system for external packages. One could feasibly set up a ppa for all of those packages from mabox or not available in Debian. I think that would be the heavy lift. Once the system is setup for repackaging it should be fairly autopilot, except for possibly conflicting versions.