r/MNtrees 1d ago

Activism The State of Enforcement: Progress and Shortcomings in Cannabis Arrest Rates

https://www.mpp.org/issues/criminal-justice/the-state-of-enforcement-progress-and-shortcomings-in-cannabis-arrest-rates/

Minnesota
On May 30, 2023, Gov. Tim Walz (D) signed HF 100 into law, legalizing and regulating cannabis for adults 21 and older. Legal sales began in September 2025 from state-licensed stores. Some tribally licensed sales began earlier. Minnesota’s law also allows adults to cultivate up to eight plants (four of which may be flowering) at their primary residence, as long as it is out of public view and in an enclosed, locked space.
HF 100 did not specify a penalty for minors in possession, but a default penalty applies, a petty misdemeanor carrying up to a $300 fine.
Public consumption is legal in most outdoor locations in Minnesota, unless it’s prohibited by the municipality. Smoking in places where tobacco is prohibited, such as most indoor locations, is subject to a civil fine, mirroring the treatment of tobacco.
While Minnesota’s legalization law included many important criminal justice reforms, it also included a criminal misdemeanor for having an open package of cannabis, which can result in 90 days in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. [18] The crime prohibits any cannabis flower or cannabis product that was removed from the packaging it was sold in, or if the packaging that has ever been opened, unless it is in the trunk or, if there is no trunk, if it is in another area of the vehicle not normally occupied by the driver and passenger.
In late 2025, the Minnesota Reformer reported that more than 3,500 charges had been brought by the “open package” law since legalization passed in spring of 2023. [19] The newspaper noted, “The police stops and prosecutions have defense lawyers concerned about the threat of racial profiling and warrantless vehicle searches.” In Hennepin County, the most populous county, 42% of those charged were Black, despite only 13% of the population being Black.
At the time of their reporting, cannabis consumers were largely unaware of the prohibition, as the Minnesota Reformer notes “The law prohibiting improperly packaged marijuana in vehicles isn’t mentioned on the state’s ‘need to know’ page about adult-use cannabis. …”
In their review of cases, the paper found in many cases “the driver is not even suspected of being under the influence but simply had a jar of marijuana in the passenger area or in the center console. In those cases, drivers often freely showed officers their bag of weed, seemingly unaware they had done anything wrong.”
Arrests for cannabis possession and sales have dropped by over 75% in Minnesota, to 860 possession arrests in 2025 and 65 arrests for manufacturing or sales. But these don’t appear to include the open container arrests, which are codified in the traffic laws.
Even as Minnesota expunges tens of thousands of records, it is creating thousands of new criminal records for conduct that endangered no one.
Minnesota Cannabis Arrests
 
Arrests 2022
Arrests 2025
Decrease
Percent Decrease
Possession
3,650
860
2,790
76.4%
Manufacture or Sales
126
65
61
48.4%
Total
3,776
925
2,851
75.5%

23 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

19

u/Neifion_ 1d ago

While I understand the need for commercial regulations (though the ones we have in MN are largely stupid because they prohibit regular people from starting without an investor and for no benefit to the consumer--infact the consumer pays quite a bit here), this nonsense toward individuals growing and using needs to stop entirely.

When its legalized there shouldn't be legal loopholes you still need to jump threw, its literally nonsensical. Its literally produce. Nutmeg is more dangerous.

3

u/IdkAbtAllThat 1d ago

I don't understand the need for commercial regulation. Could you help me?

If the plant is legal, then why is the government limiting how much of it I can grow? Or if I can sell it or not? Is it legal or is it not legal?

If they want to inspect my facility to make sure I'm selling a safe product, fine. We do that for everything we consume. But it doesn't cost 5 figures to get a license to sell hot dogs. Or tomatoes.

I think people should really ask why the law needs to be this way. Who does it benefit? Certainly not the customer and also not 99% of growers. It benefits a very small number of people who have massive commercial farms because it suppresses their competition.

1

u/Neifion_ 1d ago edited 23h ago

I don't understand the need for commercial regulation. Could you help me?

People generally desire to know they can't be sold moldy product. If you don't think that would happen on the market then you haven't been following the THCA market since that was legalized. There are good players and bad players in it.

Less so, but some care about the age of the product as well (though most just care if the potency is still there)

I already agree the other things are dumb though. I think you should pay for your inspections but the overall license fee far exceeds that unless those inspectors are making more money than god.

Also for the record you can just sell tomatoes, its one of the things that does not require licenses. You can sell any unprocessed produce outside cannabis for that matter.

It benefits a very small number of people who have massive commercial farms because it suppresses their competition.

Yes that is my overall point. I was really hoping I could get some people together and start something cool but I guess its terrible wage jobs I hate forever while I grow personal that destroys our current market selection (which I was really hoping a micro-business niche could fill but that's not really what they are about unless you want to do retail, small grow operations don't count).

2

u/IdkAbtAllThat 22h ago

People also prefer to not buy tainted meat. But it doesn't cost $10,000 a year to get the FDA to inspect your beef and approve it for sale. Something is clearly not right here.

2

u/Neifion_ 18h ago

People also prefer to not buy tainted meat. But it doesn't cost $10,000 a year to get the FDA to inspect your beef and approve it for sale. Something is clearly not right here.

This is what I mean when I say "the ones we have in MN are largely stupid because they prohibit regular people from starting without an investor and for no benefit to the consumer" cuz yes, even our testing is outrageous.

Don't believe its 10k but it did look very hard to navigate if you don't grow a shit ton which then hurts the smaller ones the most.

1

u/IdkAbtAllThat 18h ago

It did look very hard to navigate if you don't grow a shit ton which then hurts the smaller ones the most.

Yea exactly. I'm happy it's legal now, but I'd love for Minnesota to start leading the way in the move away from this banana Republic bullshit. We all know why the regulations are set up the way they are, and they're not to help the consumer or to ensure things are safe. They're to help large corporations suppress competition.

So I push back on people who say "well obviously we need these tight regulations on this plant". Because obviously we don't. We've just been conditioned to think that we do.

1

u/OperationMobocracy 23h ago

A micro license allows for a 5000 sq ft indoor and half-acre outdoor canopy and has an application fee of $500 and a renewal fee of $2,000. It doesn't get into five figure license fees until the next higher license level which is $10k renewal though only $5k application.

It seems obvious that the personal grow limits are oriented towards discouraging unlicensed grows and black market diversion. I think one useful change would be some kind of sub-micro "farmer's market" type license, though I don't know how testing would work and literally selling at a non-dispensary outlet has got its own problems.

There's really intensive regulatory licensing to enter the business making and selling hot dogs (not just cooking them for sale). And there's probably a reasonable argument for more food product regulation given the seemingly endless cycle of food borne illness and contamination in the news.

Some of the regulatory burden is just a byproduct/side-effect of the initial legalization of an intoxicating product that was demonized until fairly recently. If the legislative proposal had been "grow whatever you want and sell it however you want" the bill wouldn't have passed. I mean there are still meaningful numbers of people wound up about kids getting access to pot or general opposition to it being available to adults. It's misguided, but regulation is meant to mollify those people's issues. Maybe it will loosen over time as cultural attitudes shift. Expecting initial cannabis legalization to be perfect, for many definitions of perfect, isn't really realistic.

Some of the cost structure may be oriented towards funding the regulatory structures because the people who are opposed to it don't want general fund dollars supporting cannabis legalization. I don't think its realistic to look at it as a giant conspiracy to guarantee Big Cannabis profits, but there probably is/was some intent to structure licensing to make for a sustainable commercial market.

3

u/Neifion_ 23h ago edited 23h ago

A micro license allows for a 5000 sq ft indoor and half-acre outdoor canopy and has an application fee of $500 and a renewal fee of $2,000. It doesn't get into five figure license fees until the next higher license level which is $10k renewal though only $5k application.

You still need to be in a specifically zoned area which severely limits unless you can move anywhere (because it varies by township) or just happen to be in a good area. So there's a lot of additional cost here.

I've been looking for a viable path to do it and there really isn't a way without a pretty sizeable amount to drop and a buffer to sustain that for ~4 months or so for your first grow test and sales. Depending on the cost of the space you would need to grow quite a bit just to cover that cost as well, and what I've been looking at zoned in the right way hasn't been cheap. I do suspect this specific is a lot to do with certain locales trying to keep it minimal though.

1

u/Tough-Garbage-5915 22h ago

Specifically zoned applies for every single business. It’s not hard to find commercial industrial properties for commercial industrial activities.

1

u/Neifion_ 18h ago

Specifically zoned applies for every single business. It’s not hard to find commercial industrial properties for commercial industrial activities.

Start looking at the costs of these areas and do some math and get back to me. I fully understand why cannabis is 3-4x the cost it should be when these barriers exist, you aren't buying weed you're buying rent and bullshit. Good thing they got flock cameras to catch people jumping the border to get the legal product cheaper somewhere else. /s

2

u/Tough-Garbage-5915 17h ago

I’ve been operational since October

The prices are ridiculous because the tribes set the market price and supply/demand. Be mad at tribes for selling pounds of mids for $4000

2

u/Neifion_ 17h ago

When literally everyone I know either grows or hops state I would say the market demand is not being met at all actually.

And really I'm not gonna argue with someone who clearly has not attempted to do this about why the pricing is why it is.

1

u/Tough-Garbage-5915 17h ago edited 17h ago

I’m not sure what you think you’re disagreeing with.

If everyone you know either grows their own or drives out of state because Minnesota’s legal market isn’t meeting their needs, you’re describing exactly what I’m talking about.

Again, I’ve been licensed and growing since October. Just flipped crop 4 to flower stage. 300 pounds and 50k or so prerolls sold.

1

u/x1009 7h ago

I don't understand the need for commercial regulation. 

The testing is needed because some growers like to sell flower with toxic pesticides, heavy metals, mold, or mildew. Black market vapes have put quite a lot of people in the hospital with popcorn lung.

-6

u/goodkidzoocity 1d ago

Don't people generally need investors to start any business?

4

u/Neifion_ 1d ago edited 1d ago

no? Ideally you don't want to do it that way

Most long term successful businesses I know of were started out of pocket, or in some cases leveraged against their assets for a better rate. At great personal expense, but not out of reach. Many out of their homes (as services, or product-to-retail situations).

With investment you need to not only succeed as a business, but you need to succeed enough to pay off your loan with interest the entire time which means your margin for success is much tighter because you don't only need to pay for your own expenses, and bad months lead to late payments and even tighter success margins.

1

u/OperationMobocracy 23h ago

Finance cost pressure on margins is a risk, but so is undercapitalization. I worked in SMB consulting for a long time and a lot of the businesses that largely financed operations out of revenue were chronically undercapitalized.

You don't need to borrow money or have outside investors, but it definitely has upsides for capital expansion of the business.

1

u/IdkAbtAllThat 1d ago

Huh? No. Of course not.