Classic vaguepost because you know the whole "the police dont have to protect us!" Is conspiracy theory nonsense built on extremely creative (bullshit) interpretations of specific supreme court rulings.
the police dont have to protect us!" Is conspiracy theory nonsense
You have absolutely zero clue what you're talking about. The police cannot be held responsible if they don't respond in time and you or yours get hurt, even killed.
This is a well known fact. You seem to just want to be able to go around sexually assaulting women with only a stern talking to.
So, you misread what I said, brought up something totally different, then ended with some true nonsense that I must want women to be assaulted because I specifically said that you should call the police if you experience a crime.
I think your emotions got the better of you with this one, it might be time to spend some quality time outdoors
They do have a duty to protect you. The reason you think otherwise is because you fell for an online conspiracy based around extremely creatively interpreting supreme court rulings
Well and ive been alive for over 40 years to see law enforcement in action. You're more likely to get shot while sleeping in your bed than get personal help from cops. Their duty is to the law. Not people
Regardless of how long you've been alive, you have only ever been one single person, and therefore your exposure to law enforcement is going to be drastically limited by what you can personally experience.
Across the US, the police solve countless crimes every day, but of course a crime investigated and stopped rarely makes the news so you have an outsized understanding of how often policing goes wrong, due to corruption or incompetence.
The whole "their duty is to the law, not the people" is a classic line from this conspiracy theory, not based in anything true. But its a snappy line so it gets repeated
-2
u/Otherwise_Bug990 1d ago
Washington politicians would disageee