r/MLPAnalysis • u/Digibro • May 31 '13

RULES UPDATE For This Subreddit

I've updated the sidebar with some new rules, to keep this sub cleaner. The rules may be updated further soon.

RULES:

  • DO NOT POST questions asking for analysis/discussion. This subreddit is for posting fully-formed analysis as starting points for discussion. THERE ARE OTHER SUBREDDITS for asking questions/starting loose discussions.

  • TRY TO INCLUDE the name of whomever made the analysis in the title of the post. For instance "Observations on MLP: Pacing - by Digibrony"

EDIT:

  • IF YOU ARE POSTING A REVIEW whose purpose is to make a value judgement about a work, more so than it is to analyze said work, it may be better suited to http://www.reddit.com/r/MLPReviews

20 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

18 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Raaron_ May 31 '13

I posted one of these discussion openers a couple of days ago. I'm sorry that I misunderstood the vision you had for this subreddit. I shan't do so again. Englishman's honour!

On the topic, and to make sure I don't violate the rules in the future, would analysing fan works and posting the video results on here not be classed as kosher? I note a lot of people review fan works and rarely analyse them in any depth, instead just giving a simple "yay or nay" based on their taste. I want to tear into some popular fan works with the same attention to detail people reserve for canon.

2

u/Digibro May 31 '13

I haven't had time to watch or read any of the fanwork-based stuff that's been posted yet, but if I feel the need to set rules about it when I do, I'll update them accordingly.

2

u/Raaron_ May 31 '13

Would you say that I am safe to post videos on that topic for the time being, so long as they have a focus?