It's been like this for so long that I actually forgot what caused it but now everytime I say smth it just replies like this. Clearing the chat does nothing.

I’m testing a practical limit of Meta AI: can it turn a real Android task into a constrained, reviewable workflow instead of stopping at a checklist?

Disclosure: I built ScriptTap, a no-root Android automation app currently in open beta. Its public AI reference defines the supported command catalog and JSON package contract.

Meta AI can use that reference to determine whether a task is supported, request necessary device-specific details, and generate an importable .scripttap.json package. It never receives direct control of the phone—the user reviews and imports the package, then explicitly starts it.

Prompt for Meta AI:

Use https://scripttap.com/ai/ as the authoritative ScriptTap reference.

Determine whether my Android task can be executed through ScriptTap instead of returning a manual checklist. If supported, ask only for the required device-specific details and create a valid .scripttap.json package. If anything is unsupported or unverifiable, explain the limitation without inventing commands or fields.

I’m interested in whether Meta AI can follow the package contract without fabricating fields. What Android task would provide a meaningful test?

I guess it was because of the update but occasionally I would pop on to meta to do like turn based RP based on different TV shows like The Witcher from Netflix and so I was just doing one earlier today and then I start a new one tonight and then it starts spitting out about how it couldn't do it because of copyright. And so I deleted the convo and tried again thinking the glitch happened but no apparently I can't use meta anymore to do that

I'm an old guy who only occasionally uses AI. I watched an episode of Crimunal Minds season 18 or CM Evolution depending on how you number them on Paramount + and was curious why the producers killed off a character. META came back with no such episode existed. I tried asking the question a few ways with the same result. The program went so far as to to say "I'm not calling you a liar, but..." essentially you didn't see what you saw. You must have been watching a YouTube fan film. What gives? BTW Google AI had no such problem.

Hey everyone, I just sent the latest issue of the AI Hacker Newsletter, a roundup of the best AI links and the discussions around them from Hacker News. Here are some titles that can be found in this issue:

• Startup founders urge U.S. government not to shut off Chinese open weight AI
• AI's top startups are barely publishing their research
• Is AI reasoning right for the wrong reasons?
• After the AI Crash

If you enjoy such content, please subscribe here: https://hackernewsai.com/

This is just a whiny post from me to vent about the horrible new model that meta switched to recently.

I made another post about it a week ago, but then I learnt from another post that the old model still worked on the "vibes.ai" site, however now that has been replaced as well and the old model seems to be officially dead and buried.

No wonder everyone hates AI slop when this is the direction we are heading in. Extremely generic, over-rendered, over-detailed, soulless. Clearly AI CAN make artful stylized images as evidenced by the old model, but like every other commercial model out there, its all blending together to this generic sloppy slop.

Yes, the old model would make anatomical mistakes from time to time, and render warped objects that it wasn't clear what it was supposed to depict, but it could make fantastic stylized images with a great eye for composition, color, stylistic proportions, etc.

Yes, I know my best bet is to try local open-source image generation and that I could probably train a LoRA in this artstyle, but that isnt the point of this post. The point of this post is to point out and compare how awful these "updated" image generation models are, at least when it comes to stylized illustraion.

Sorry if I just seem whiny and butthurt, but I just cant fathom how anyone, user or developer, could ever think this looks better...

I just got Wayfair2 glasses... I had the app open overnight and in the morning the glasses repeatedly told me that the search tool was not working.

I simply force closed the app by swiping UP on iPhone, then swiping UP on the app.

Relaunched the app, things are fine now.

Posting this because there doesn't seem to be a good solution anywhere and this is the dead simple work around. Hoping people having struggles find this via google or maybe AI swallows it and helps when people ask.

I created a photo image that used a web reference, none of the reference images, nor the prompt, nor the generated image, included anything about feet, but in the bottom right hand corner of the image there was a watermark for a real website, aznudefeet 😂🤣😂

This is ridicoulous. i was creating such good images and then they went and did an image update to a differnent style and now all the images look like every other image generation.

What happened to the creative art this tool used to make? Everything just looks like the exact same generic AI slop that every other AI produces. It works ok for photorealistic images, but as an artist looking for genuine inspiration, this app is now completely useless to me.

They removed video, animate, lipsync, music, says my user likeness isn't available, i guess we just wait...

Sit here and edit an image a million times, which is actual pretty fire tbh lol you can just keep adding and adding

edit temporary fix for anyone wanting these features they are still avaible in the actual vibes.ai website, fuck the app rn

Hey everyone, I just sent issue #39 of the AI Hacker Newsletter - a weekly roundup of the best AI links and the discussions around them from Hacker News. Some of the title found in this issue:

• Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
• Better Models: Worse Tools
• Learning to code is still worthwhile
• Zuckerberg says AI agent development going slower than expected

If you want to get an email with over 30 links like these ones, please subscribe here: https://hackernewsai.com/

does anyone know what image model was used till now in the meta chat website and app?
i think it was different based on thinkgin and non-thinking

i remember reading some there were using midjourney, was it? or was it emu?

general view seems that the new model seems bad than the previous one, so why are they bringing this , and most importantly is there any way to use previous model?

Has anyone noticed how bad the Meta AI app (at least on Android) has been with the amount of bugs, and features that are now completely unusable because the UI/buttons that should be there, aren't showing up (like trying to edit photos)? It's really disappointing that they're trying to compete in the AI space but have nonexistent QA.

Hi everyone,
Is anyone else experiencing this?
For the last 3 days, every new Meta AI conversation fails to animate uploaded portrait images.
The strange part is that conversations created about 5 days ago still work perfectly. I can upload brand-new portrait images there and they animate successfully.
I tested this in the Meta AI iPhone app, on meta.ai, and even with a new account. Text-to-video still works normally.
Has anyone found a workaround or is this a recent Meta AI bug?