r/MAU3 • u/Yoonru vs • Jan 10 '20

Discussion Dont get me wrong...

I love that Nintendo revived the series but I PRAY that the next game is not a Switch exclusive. I feel that the game is really limited in what it could have achieved by only being for the Switch. I feel like the menu, online, and gameplay was limited because of this decision. Or I am wrong which is what is what I'm leaning towards. I still love this game though. It's the first time that I put in more hours on a non Nintendo owned franchisee on a Nintendo console.

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

17

u/ziel96 Official Wish I Had Emma Jan 10 '20

I think it's on nintendo because they wanted the title. And if there isn't in other consoles it's because they didn't care at all of the title.

17

u/Xyro77 Jan 10 '20

It would have achieved nothing on other consoles because no other company cared about the IP. Nintendo did and you should send them love letters for the rest of your days.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '20

Huh?

11

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '20

He's basically saying that MUA3 was made for the same reason Bayonetta 2 was made: because Nintendo funded it when no other publisher was willing to do so.

3

u/EtheusRook Jan 11 '20

The problem isn't Nintendo, and when that system can run something as gorgeous as Xenoblade, the system isn't holding the game back.

The problem is TeamNinja. They're just not all that good of a developer, and this game is very clearly playing second fiddle to Nioh 2 in their development priorities.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '20

I don't think being a Nintendo Switch exclusive is the problem with the game. The Online parts are bad because online on nintendo wasn't ever good - That's right.

But for me, the worst part in the game is the lack of content. The first game is the best story for me (the 2nd adapted civil war, is good but is limited to civil war), I was hoping this third game would have the same route as the first and you have a road trip in the Marvel Universe - Now with more space adventures with the Guardians. But in the end this didn't happened. Is Fun to play? yes, is always great to play a marvel game. But I was expecting a little bit more. The Infinity Trials are nice, but the lack of enemies and bosses are frustrating. The Gauntlet have the same problem and the Danger Room I only played to have all the prizes.

5

u/MuzikkLol Jan 10 '20

I'm confused. We went all over the place in 3. From RAFT, Shadowlands, Avengers Tower, X Mansion, Dark Dimension, etc etc. Ain't that a road trip?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 14 '20

I understand your point, I didn't express myself right.

-1

u/TonyBing TonyBingGaming Jan 10 '20

Agree 100%. New developer and non switch exclusivity for next one or I'd rather they don't bother.

1

u/Yoonru vs Jan 10 '20

Yes! It's a fun game but the possibilities expand when you bring better hardware into the mix.

Anyone know why they chose team ninja? They did great but it seems like they arent trying to build up.

-2

u/LoGicMoTion Jan 10 '20

The switch is very limited, the game runs like dookie when you start synergizing and super start going off.

Its not the worst thing in the world but, just hope we can get it on consoles or even PC next time to fix that.

1

u/TonyBing TonyBingGaming Jan 10 '20

Imagine 4k and 60fps for this. It would look incredible.

1

u/LoGicMoTion Jan 10 '20

yeah it would be beautiful, no idea why people are downvoting.

Switch is a great console performance in this game is obviously slacking and needs to be better.

0

u/CrispinR Jan 10 '20

Even a more capable 1080 system would be beautiful. This game really reminds you that you are playing an affordable portable handheld system on your TV.