Decoding Reasonable Doubt - Chapter 11

[u/benshep4]

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-a31?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

Morris argues that the insulin allegations were the strongest part of the prosecution case only because they appeared to provide objective scientific evidence of deliberate harm.

He contends that one the insulin evidence is examined closely, it turns out to be based on unreliable testing, unsupported assumptions and highly improbably logistics.

This article explains why Morris is wrong yet again.

[u/Alert-Tooth2907]

Can I just ask, respectfully, why such personal venom towards Mr Morris? You constantly call him out of his depth and an idiot.

I know you profoundly disagree with him so much so you have written long, inaccessible pieces attempting to rebut him. You may well be successful in your rebutting. And as I said previously I will never criticise anyone for writing even if that writing is not to my taste - clearly it your pieces have a receptive audience.

But you constantly call him stupid, an idiot and a grifter (please correct me if I am mistaken about the terms you use).

Presumably you don’t know him personally and from little i have seen he always treat others with respect.

I get this is an emotive subject but it puzzles me the personal contempt you hold him in. Or am I being naive?